there’s a sense in which Donald Trump’s administration was the best thing that could happen to the professional-managerial class that most loathed him. he drew all kinds of fire that otherwise would turn towards them. 1/
i just listened to @LRCkcrw, and (on COVID stuff) it might have been Rush Limbaugh talking, the way all three of (“left”) @ebruenig (“right”) @DouthatNYT and (“center”) @jbarro used the term “bureaucrats”. castro.fm/episode/4N02rT 2/
i found this particularly striking with respect to @jbarro, who five years ago, in the wake of Trump’s election, became a pretty full-throated defender of elites and deference to elite guidance. 3/
now he sees the problem as a Biden Administration to strongly influenced by “bureaucrats” and by a faction the three panelists identified as Hillary Clinton supporters, who have deflected Biden from his own wiser and more sound temperamental bias towards “normal”. 4/
it’s the neurotic upscale pinheads for whom “work-from-home” is no great hardship versus “normal”. that seemed the consensus view of the three panelists. it also wouldn’t be unfamiliar on fox news. 5/
i can’t imagine even of these three panelists coming to anything near a consensus like this under a Trump Administration. 6/
failures of public health would have been blamed much more on the dysfunction of the administration in corrupting or failing to interface well with public health experts, rather than on the experts corrupting the sound soft populism (“normal ppl”) of the administration. 7/
one way to put it is that a decade and a half of elite-led catastrophe had made populism very popular by 2016, but the emergence of so ridiculous and obnoxious a figurehead as Donald Trump gave experts an ironic last play at demanding deference with roughly half the country. 8/
but absent the shelter of Donald Trump, “professionals” have not succeeded in turning around public skepticism. the unraveling of the legitimacy of demands of deference has continued. 9/
even among people like @jbarro who, i think, half a decade ago would have been a full throated defender of elite legitimacy. 10/
(i’ll note i am not intending in this thread to throw stones at @jbarro @ebruenig @DouthatNYT, all three of whom i hold in very high regard. i broadly agree with the new consensus i attribute to them.) 11/
(but we’d better figure out a kind of normal-people populism more muscular than what Joe Biden has offered, more competent and less destructive of our ability to live together than what Donald Trump offered, ASAP.) /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Randy Waldman

Steve Randy Waldman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @interfluidity

5 Oct
This essay by @VitalikButerin, in dialog with @nathanairplane, is very good. I'll highlight two points I already agreed with, and a third which is new to me, interesting and creative. vitalik.ca/general/2021/0… via @KlingBlog 1/
So often people tell me that, sigh, the root of human suffering is coordination problems, that if only we could overcome our prisoners' dilemmas, what a better world we'd have of it. This misses a crucial point @VitalikButerin makes. 2/
The bones of nearly all functional social institutions are coordination problems. We rely upon them. No government wld be stable if incumbency + existing procedure weren't a hard-to-reroute Schelling point. Market competition depends on diverse producers failing to coordinate. 3/
Read 16 tweets
9 Sep
@rplzzz nothing to apologize for! i don't think you'll be surprised i see it differently. if we're in a game with two sides, they are better characterized as "activists" and "everyone else" than left vs right or trumpist antivaxxers vs the rest of us or all of that. 1/
@rplzzz most of the unvaccinated are not diehard (they die too easily) political intransigents. yet most are either attached to minority communities or trumpish political communities. but most of the unvaccinated attached to trumpist political communities are not politically motivated 2/
@rplzzz intransigents, but when they are surveyed express a broad range of hesitancies not dissimilar from those of minority communities — prefer to wait and see, don't want to be guinea pig, not so worried about COVID, can't afford time off for side effects — etc. 3/
Read 19 tweets
24 Jul
polio vaccination is often performed sequentially, first with a very safe inactivated virus vaccine, then with a riskier attenuated live virus. the first vaccination renders the second one much less dangerous. cochrane.org/CD011260/BEHAV… 1/
given the extraordinary transmissibility of delta and frequent reports of usually mild “breakthrough infections”, i wonder if the end game here is that we’ll be dragged involuntarily through an analogous protocol. 2/
the role of vaccination becomes not to prevent infection, but to ensure the infection that eventually (hopefully) deepens and completes our immunity is very mild. 3/
Read 8 tweets
23 Jul
i agree very much with @jp_koning, fiat money is not a meme. but i don't think characterizing it as a conventional debt instrument quite works either. 1/ jpkoning.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-do…
suppose Bill Gates were to issue a perpetual, never redeemable, non-interest-bearing Gatescoin. Bill Gates' solvency, on its own, would tell us little about its value. 2/
owing to his solvency, Bill Gates would have the capacity to *give* such a coin value, say by committing to put a floor under it in the market, or by creating circumstances in which markets perceive such a commitment. 3/
Read 7 tweets
21 Jun
this idea that an institutionally legal but morally stolen election (say legislatures in key states overrule voters, citing “irregularities”) will be prevented on the streets risks a first time as farce, second time as tragedy catastrophe. 1/
every stern denouncement of the 1/6 “insurrection”, every demand on Rachel Maddow that a tough, militarized response should have crushed the insurgents to spare our legislators their traumas, will be hauled out. 2/
provocateurs will intentionally seed chaos in order to force law enforcement and the military, who were and would be appropriately reticent to intervene in this kind of thing heavy handedly, to suppress “the riots”. 3/
Read 6 tweets
20 Jun
so often we treat normative problems as positive problems. pre-ACA one might have done all kinds of modeling of the causes of health care uninsuredness, but the meaningful cause was absence of policy. (and it still is!) 1/
positive, empirical work is what most social scientists do. data is “receipts”, authority, publications. “surely we need to understand the problem if we are going to solve it.” 2/
but absent strong levers to anchor outcomes, social affairs can be endlessly complex, so noisy our models decide what we see, and modelers with divergent priors will never agree. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(