X : You're often quite harsh on Google.
Me : What?!? Where did that come from. I like Google but they've got tough challenges ahead. Friends don't just go "you're doing fine" when you're not.
X : What tough challenges?
Me : Ok ...
1. The rise of serverless and FinOps, especially when we get things like carbon reporting / energy use per function etc. Google's down the Kubernetes path and AWS is running away with it. 2. The shift of networks into space and the application of Moore's law ...
... once networks get up there, compute and storage will eventually follow. AWS (GroundStation et al), SpaceX etc are all over this. 3. The growth of competitors from China (Alibaba, Baidu). Don't underestimate the impact to the cultural psyche of Silicon Valley as ...
... China is seen as more successful than the West. 4. The growth of the metaverse and immersive experiences (see Facebook to AWS New World to MSFT Bethesda). Google's betting on AR as its starting point but get that wrong and you lose eyeballs ...
5. Inceasing political pressure and regulatory scrutiny for a host of reasons from digital sovereignty, embedding of nation state values into AI and accusations of market failure / monopoly.
These are all tough challenges.
X : Datacentres in space, not in the next 25 years.
Me : Sure. But many of us will spend the first 20 years going "no, it won't happen". The next 10 years going "it's just for startups". The 10 years after that panicking as we realise that all our assets are becoming liabilities.
X : Data centres in space? What problem are you trying to solve?
Me : As the network moves into space then compute & storage will follow.
X : It'll never happen.
Me : It already is -> NTT to launch data centres into space within five years - telecoms.com/509855/ntt-to-…
Me : Longer term, we don't have a choice. The mass of information cannot be held on Earth.
X : Why not?
Me : Because of its mass. Before that there are resource constraints. Construction won't be on Earth.
X : What do you mean "because of its mass"
Me : aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.…
X : That's hundreds of years away.
Me : That is irrelevant. What matters is that we agree that the mass of information cannot be held on Earth. Now, it becomes a question of when not if. You see it as far away, I view it as closer as networks move into space.
X : I don't think it will happen.
Me : But we agreed it would?
X : Eventually, but ...
Me : Ok, once we can get beyond the if, it's now a question of when. We need to consider what could drive that movement. Many impossible things turn up in a 50 year timeframe.
To give perspective, I sat in a room with a bunch of IBM execs and explained how they would lose their hardware business to Amazon ... that was in 2008. I was basically laughed out the room. Well, it's 2021 and I don't see IBM laughing now. A lot can happen in 13 years.
I would be very cautious at underestimating the speed at which the network will move into space, the industrialisation of launching technology and robotics, the need for compute in space and the speed at which this will happen.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : Thoughts on the metaverse?
Me : Depends upon what you mean. I'm all in favour of remote collaboration, co-operation and distribution of power but I'm not in favour of plugging myself into the matrix with Zuckerberg as the architect. I have met Mark. No thanks.
X : You don't think it will be a success?
Me : Depends. Not in the East but in the West, it'll be a huge success. People are more than happy to sell their future and the future of their children for a few baubles. We're suckers for this ...
... I can imagine those future conversations.
Daughter, we may all be enslaved in the metaverse, there is no life beyond it but through a lifetime of work, I now bequeath you (pursuant to the rules of inheritance, section 5.01) the hammer of majikthise. Go change the meta world.
Excellent reporting by @BBCRosAtkins and @BBCNews. However, given the lack of integrity shown by this Gov, I can only assume that the "noise" over the party is misdirection away from something else ->
or alternatively the work of critical theorists trying to destabilise the Gov by demonstrating its behaviour doesn't hold to our values in order to present a new way -
X : Thoughts on Re:Invent?
Me : Wasn't there. Keynotes I listened to were encouraging. I particularly liked the focus on sustainability and serverless. Some interesting new services. Seemed like a solid event that reinforced AWS leadership in the new world.
X : Can a graph be a map?
Me : All maps are graphs but only some graphs are maps. In a map, space has meaning ... however ...
Me : ... if you collapse all possible paths (i.e. all options) to only those shown on the graph i.e. there is no possibility to wander off the defined paths and to explore the space then in that very special case ... the graph is also a map as the space is exhausted of meaning.
However, most "maps" that I see - mindmaps, business process maps, systems maps - are not in fact maps but graphs. The options are not exhausted, they provide no means of exploring the space and the landscape does change.
"only pay when the data warehouse is in use, not when it sits idle" ... I think I hear the sound of a plethora of home grown CIO projects and vendors going "pop" at the same time - techcrunch.com/2021/11/30/aws…