#NationalityAndBordersBill

Tomorrow & Wednesday will be last two days for MPs to scrutinise & vote on this Bill. To how much of following can they possibly give proper scrutiny, let alone meaningfully vote upon given Government will ‘whip’ to require its majority wins out? 1/15
Clause 9 will empower Home Secretary to strip British citizens of their citizenship in secret.

Stripping people of their citizenship is already a draconian power. Seeking power to do so secretly shows contempt for British citizenship & the rights of every British person. 2/15
Clause 10 will empower Home Sec to refuse to register right of a stateless child, born in UK & lived here at least five years, to British citizenship.

Leaving kids born & growing up here without British citizenship & stateless shows contempt for children & their rights. 3/15
Clause 11 will empower Home Sec to withhold basic rights from many refugees in UK because she provides no #safepassage & forces them to come by other means.

Penalising someone because they exercise their rights (to seek asylum) by only means you’ve left them is cruel. 4/15
Clause 15 will empower Home Sec to leave refugees in limbo while she begs other countries already receiving more refugees than UK to take our responsibilities too.

Wrecking asylum system by building bigger backlogs & calling this fixing is as hypocritical as it is stupid. 5/15
Clause 25 will create conditions in which asylum decision-makers are directed to give little weight to evidence however conclusive that evidence may be.

Directing decision-makers to do anything but honestly appraise evidence before them shows contempt for them & their role. 6/15
Clause 26 will empower Home Secretary to again lock up people seeking asylum & rush their appeals at breakneck speed.

Not only has this been shown to be hopelessly unjust, it’s led to people whose appeals were rushed ahead still languishing in detention for months after. 7/15
Clause 28 is intended to empower Home Sec to expel people seeking asylum to other countries while their claims are considered.

Australia has spent billions trying & failing to deter people seeking asylum by inflicting enormous cruelty on some few people by this same policy. 8/15
Clause 29 seeks to unilaterally redefine & confine the meaning of an international agreement to aid Ministers in shirking their asylum responsibilities.

Ripping up an international agreement while expecting others to adhere to it is reckless & contemptuous. 9/15
Clause 39 will make most refugees arriving in UK liable to prosecution with possible 4 years in prison.

Criminalising & imprisoning people for exercising their rights (to seek asylum) is tyranny. Since it may persuade people to hide from authorities, it’s also reckless. 10/15
Clause 40 includes power to prosecute people who for no gain at all assist someone to reach UK to seek asylum with possible life imprisonment.

This Bill positively aids people smugglers while threatening people seeking asylum & any Good Samaritan who may come to their aid. 11/15
Clause 44 seeks to enable reckless manoeuvres at sea to attempt to push people seeking asylum away from UK.

More than 120 women, men & children have lost their lives seeking to cross Channel since 2017. Government seems determined to add to this shocking death toll. 12/15
And that’s not to mention many measures such as to increase barriers to victims of modern slavery receiving their due protection, to increase likelihood that children are wrongly treated as adults & to refuse visas to people because of their nationality. 13/15
Nor to mention important backbench & opposition amendments such as to end scandalous profit-making from children’s rights to British citizenship, to do some justice to #Chagossians & permit people seeking asylum to work. 14/15
How much of this will, even can, Parliament properly consider before it may be passed into law?

Is this parliamentary sovereignty or elective dictatorship?

And what will be made, if anything, of fact that its victims will disproportionately be black & brown people? 15/15

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Valdez-Symonds

Steve Valdez-Symonds Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stevesymondsAI

12 Oct
People crossing the Channel by boat to seek asylum are visible in a way that people making different journeys to UK to do so are not. Ministers & others have exploited this visibility to excite some sense of national emergency. But what is the reality… 1/11
Firstly, there were more asylum claims made in UK in 2019 than 2020. In first half of 2021, there were more claims than in first half of 2020 but still fewer than same period in 2019. So, over period of heightened attention to boat crossings, asylum claims haven’t gone up. 2/11
Secondly, backlogs & delays in asylum system have significantly increased over this period. Pandemic certainly had an impact as did @ukhomeoffice response to it. And Ministers have added to this by delaying consideration of many claims. 3/11
Read 11 tweets
18 Feb
One striking aspect drawn out in today’s children’s citizenship fee judgment is that the Home Secretary effectively abandoned her own evidence submitted to the High Court & sought to rely on parliamentary debates to show she had done something her own evidence could not show. 1/7
Her own evidence showed she hadn’t considered children’s best interests in setting a fee that deprived many children of citizenship rights, not least because it showed a failure or refusal to understand that citizenship rights were highly important & belonged to the children. 2/7
So, she tried to rely on debates in Parliament led by peers & MPs, with support from @PRCBC1 & @AmnestyUK, many of whom aghast at the fee, to say that because others had complained at her fee’s injustice & impact this was enough for her to have considered this. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
12 Jan 18
Her daughter was banned from Home Office building because officials refused to tolerate being told they were wrong. Let’s think on that. 1/5
Over several years, Ministers & Parliament have cut & removed rights of appeal because they refuse to tolerate people insisting officials are wrong & trying to correct that. 2/5
Ministers & Parliament have cut & removed #legalaid & constrained access to judicial review because they refuse to tolerate people insisting officials are wrong & trying to correct that. 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(