The Downing Street 'party' debacle has shone a welcome light on what's been happening in Covid-19 prosecutions in London.
That Ilford gathering I posted earlier is one of a series of cases dating back to December 2020 which are before a magistrate this week:
All bundled through the Single Justice Procedure, not in open court, not publicised in any meaningful way to the public, dealt with by a magistrate sitting behind closed doors.
There have been more than 2000 of these type of prosecutions in London since last September.
More than £1.2m in fines imposed, for lockdown parties, illegal gatherings, after hours work drinks, and more.
If someone from Downing St was fined, no one would hear about it. If they failed to pay & ended up being prosecuted, the 'court hearing' would be private and there's a good chance no one would noticed.
Secret courts we now allow in this country are pretty scandalous themselves.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Met Police happens to be, this week, prosecuting an alleged illegal gathering on December 18 last year.
Not in Downing Street, but a house in Ilford.
Being around a year ago isn't the issue - I'd imagine this prosecution was launched last month.
However the basis of it is overwhelmingly likely to be a police officer's statement, giving evidence of what they saw on Dec 18.
The Downing St 'party' case faces two obstacles:
- police policy not to investigate Covid breaches its officers didn't personally witness
- a lack of actual evidence
Nothing insurmountable, but you'd imagine a whistleblower speaking to police is essential.
"Why are they still appearing by videolink?", asked a member of court staff, of barristers in a sentencing hearing.
"A lot of people are getting sick", replied her colleague.
"Maybe they just don't want to come anymore", said the first.
At first, I was annoyed to hear this kind of comment, as if caution & safety measures should be set aside simply because the pandemic has been going on for a while.
Covid-19 cases are rising sharply, shouldn't remote solutions be preferred - if possible - as winter approaches?
A top judge the other day said: "We've now reached a stage in the playing out of the pandemic when it is possible to contemplate a gradual increase in the volume of cases that are heard in person in
court".
It might be 'possible' but is that kind of sweeping approach sensible?
These are some of the words offered in mitigation for PC Wayne Couzens, as he faces sentencing for the murder of Sarah Everard.
His barrister argued that a life sentence, but not a whole life sentence, should be imposed, and Couzens is likely to die in prison either way.
"He makes no excuses for his actions, he accepts he will receive and deserves a severe punishment.
“No right-minded person reading the papers or listening to the statements read out by the Everard family could feel anything other than revulsion for what he did.
"He doesn't seek to make excuses for anything he did. He is filled with self-loathing and abject shame and he should be.
There is little mitigation and deserves and expects nothing less than a life sentence."
The Met Police officer who kidnapped and murdered Sarah Everard used Covid-19 laws to carry out a bogus arrest of the 33yo, the Old Bailey has heard.
He was carrying an array of police equipment and posing as an undercover cop when he handcuffed and captured her.
PC Wayne Couzens, an officer who was heavily in debt and contemplating leaving the Met, had made preparations for the crimes he was about to commit, including buying a spare key for his handcuffs.
Sarah Everard was walking home from dinner with a friend when she was kidnapped.
The Judicial Review and Courts Bill poses a massive threat to #openjustice particularly coverage of magistrates court proceedings.
You wouldn't know it from the official press release, relegating these changes to "a range of other courts measures" in the footnotes.
What is being proposed will be music to the ears of defendants who'd rather no one knew they've been accused of a crime
Don't fancy appearing in open court hearing to face the charge, indicate a plea, and for the case to be sent to the crown court? No problem, that's all covered
The new Bill, if passed, allows for:
- indications of plea to be given in writing
- allocation of trial to magistrate or crown courts to be done administratively
- committals to crown court without a hearing, if guilty plea indicated.