When I teach a gun-safety course I tell my students that everyone is responsible for gun safety and they should speak up if they witness anyone doing anything unsafe, even me. There's no reason a set shouldn't operate the exact same way.
I can understand why an armorer wouldn't want an actor to mess with the loadout of a gun set up in a specific way for a scene, but Baldwin himself provides a reasonable alternative in his ABC interview: have the armorer show everyone the gun is safe. thereload.com/analysis-compl…
The scene setup itself was also dangerous and everyone watching should've noticed that. Guns being pointed at anyone should be avoided as much as possible even on a set. I don't see why it was necessary in this scene. thereload.com/analysis-compl…
Somebody, anybody, should've spoken up about the clear safety concerns. Nobody did.
Baldwin explained that he'd grown accustomed to shirking any and all responsibility for gun handling because it had worked out ok in the past. He probably isn't alone. thereload.com/analysis-compl…
I've written public pieces on the Baldwin shooting, and done a podcast with somebody who has actually overseen guns on set. But, this piece is exclusive to @TheReloadSite members. They made the piece possible by funding the publication. You can join too! thereload.com/membership-sal…
If you want to check out The Reload to see what we're all about before you consider buying a membership, sign up for our FREE weekly newsletter. thereload.com/free-newslette…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's weird that Fox is making this horror movie into a competition cooking show, right?
I mean, what the hell is going on here?
This reminds me of the time Sony made a Jessie Eisenberg comedy out of a true story where criminals strapped a bomb to a pizza delivery guy and forced him to rob a bank before killing him.
Baldwin's full explanation is that he pulled the hammer back and when he released it, the gun went off. That's very difficult to explain without the trigger being depressed. thereload.com/analysis-yes-a…
"I cock the gun. I go, ‘Can you see that? Can you see that? Can you see that?’” Baldwin told ABC. “And then I let go of the hammer of the gun, and the gun goes off."
He also claims he didn't pull the trigger.
There are two scenarios I can think of where that could happen, but both seem improbable. The first is is the hammer being pulled back far enough to set off a round but not far enough to catch a sear. That's a real hard sell.
Most claims that a gun "went off" on its own can be dismissed out of hand. In Alec Baldwin's case, it's not quite that easy. thereload.com/analysis-yes-a…
Modern firearms, including many antique reproductions, include safety mechanisms that prevent a shot from being fired without the trigger being pulled. They make it so a gun can't go off on its own without some kind of defect in the gun.
However, not all replicas have these.
Police say Baldwin was using a modern replica of single-action revolver. Those are sold with or without a safety known as a transfer bar. Many prefer the traditional design without the safety, and it can be safe if handled properly. It's not clear which model Baldwin used.
This is possible if the gun had some kind of serious mechanical issue. But, I'm highly skeptical about claims like this. It should be easy for police to tell if the gun in question could fire without the trigger being pulled.
It's true that very old single-action revolvers have more issues with accidental discharges. The gun used in this incident was a replica made by Pietta, according to police. Those guns should have transfer bars in them that address the safety issue.
The police should be able to determine pretty easily if the gun has a transfer bar or not. And how prone it would be to fire without the trigger being pulled when it's drawn from a holster.
Are we ever going to learn the reason why this monster committed that massacre? He wasn't being actively chased and it wouldn't make any sense to run over a bunch of people in a parade even if he was.