Now starting: Webinar on scaling up biomethane in Europe. With an impressive line-up of companies across the value chain, and participation of European Commissioner for Energy @KadriSimson
Supported by my colleague Daan Peters.
.@KadriSimson: In the medium and long term, we'll need to replace unmitigated natural gas and reduce methane emissions. Biomethane can play an important role here. With the second part of our #Fitfor55 package, due mid-December, we will promote biomethane production and use.
"We see three main obstacles: 1) Biomethane is connected to the gas grid at distribution level. Need reverse flows to transport it further. 2) Upgrading to biomethane and injection into the grid needs to become cheaper. 3) We need to enable trade across EU member state borders."
"We need to look at how to better optimize network planning, between electricity, hydrogen, and (bio)methane grids.
I truly believe that our reforms can help decarbonize gas, reduce import dependence, and increase resilience to gas price shocks."
"The current energy crisis emphasizes the need to speed up the energy transition, renewables and energy efficiency. We look forward to your continued supportt, and to work with you on making this happen."
.@GRTgaz's @ThTrouve presents the Biomethane Declaration by 26 companies to Commissioner @KadriSimson, committed to support scaling up biomethane in the EU.
Impressive list of companies and organisations supporting the biomethane initiative, from supply, transport, and demand sides.
.@KadriSimson responds: "I am happy with your initiative. Reducing the imports of fossil fuels is now a very clear benefit of EU renewable and low-carbon gases. Biomethane can play a role in decarbonising industry, but also in heating of homes, alongside electric heat pumps."
PS Decarbonisation isn't really the right word here ;)
Using biomethane replaces emissions of fossil CO2 by biogenic CO2, taken up by the plants it comes from at the same time, with net-zero effect on atmospheric CO2.
When combined with reducing agricultural methane emissions, using biomethane is a double win for the climate. Of course, as with all methane, any leaks in production, transport, and use have to be minimized to a very low percentage.
If I were in the government of an EU member state exposed to natural gas scarcity and very high energy prices, I'd use the momentum to put in place a massive energy efficiency drive, with short-, medium-, and long-term elements. Never waste a good crisis.
So far, the deer-in-the-headlight approach seems to be the more popular one, unfortunately.
Such a program would address all sectors: industry, large buildings, homes, trucks, passenger cars, shipping, and aviation. Quick wins would be combined with structural measures taking a bit more time. Long term commitments would form the basis for a whole new industry.
When I heard about plans for a series of new nuclear plants in France (first one ready around 2035), I remembered a similar announcement around 2005. Found it now!
By now, we were supposed to see one 1,600 MW nuclear power plant to be completed each year. The final decision was to be based on 3 years of experience with Flamanville 3, to be completed in 2012.
That article was published in December 2007, at the start of construction of Flamanville 3. The planned construction time was 4.5 years, but it still hasn't been completed 14 years later. web.archive.org/web/2014101402…
Current extremely high natural gas price in the Netherlands drives boom in anything that lowers consumption: hybrid heat pumps, insulation works, DIY materials. The right response! nos.nl/l/2402036
The best part of reducing your gas demand in times of scarcity is that every m³ saves reduces the price of the remaining m³, by cooling the market.
Somehow, you'd expect govt to be more vocal on the importance of energy conservation now, especially after just announcing a €3 billion handout to compensate everyone for the high energy prices.
Watching a webinar on the Dutch hydrogen backbone: Hyway27. Govt budget 2022 has funding for it. streamxpert.nl/hyway27webinar…
Modeled hydrogen flows in 2030 over the backbone infrastructure in the Netherlands, with the planned 3-4 GW of electrolyzer capacity, in PJ/year.
10 PJ = 2.8 TWh = 8,000 tonnes of hydrogen.
The idea is to use existing gas pipelines, becoming available as the Groningen gas field has to ramp down production.
The repurposing costs are estimated at just €0.4 million per km (cleaning, preparing, valve replacement) vs over €3 million for a new pipeline.
Listening #ClimateMiles podcast with climate scientist @HeleendeConinck. “World needs to go to net-zero emissions by 2050, but rich countries should be there before, e.g. 2040.
The Netherlands govt doesn’t (even) have a plan yet for net-zero by 2050.” theclimatemiles.nl/podcast/dag-5-…
Good point that we don’t have a plan yet for net-zero emissions from the Netherlands by 2050. Would be a good basis for exploring net-zero by 2040 too. Things will change in the meantime (solutions can also get cheaper than expected), but it’s good to know what it looks like.
Here’s TU/e’s @HeleendeConinck with Red Cross climate expert Maarten van Aalst: EU Green Deal and NL govt plans should have net-zero emissions target for 2040 (not 2050) nos.nl/l/2401896