New Caledonia referendum a harbinger of violence? Decolonization and self determination during a time of global crisis and chaos brought on by climate change, a global pandemic and global economic insecurity and transition.
While this analysis is from the perspective of France’s regional interests, I don’t see any evidence of acknowledgement of adversaries and possible annexation. The splintering of nations during a time of great crisis occurred before WW2.
Review maps of Europe, Middle East & Asia in 1918-1923.
During the global Spanish Flu pandemic that killed estimated 100 million people, several European, Middle East and Asian ethnic groups asserted independence. But hegemony shaped national boundaries through treaties.
Self determination is the goal. But superpowers don’t recognize self determination and nationhood of smaller ethnic states.
Within four years, the map was revised repeatedly while ethnic groups and hegemon powers jockeyed for control of resources and political influence.
Several small independent nations were created & then swallowed in a very short period of time due to annexation wars or treaties imposed by the major powers of the allies.
Britain, France, Soviet Union & the US shaped the region post WW1 based on their political interests.
Self determination was the myth sold by hegemonic powers to create chaos and disunity.
Divide and conquer. It’s the oldest trick in the book of war.
Read some history.
There are hegemonic powers doing the exact same right now. We can ignore it and dream of independence.
Or we can acknowledge it and use a different strategy to maintain democratic governance.
Because that’s what is at stake.
Every contemporary hegemon is competing for influence and control. In a global context, self determination & national sovereignty is being used to divide.
What happened at the end of the four year period post WW1?
Fascists in Italy and Nazis in Germany, and Communists in Soviet Union regrouped and built support among the masses. They began to assert their power.
What happened immediately in the post war period? Expansion of territory by annexation.
Russia maintained its troops in war in 1917 despite the revolution. Instability of leadership by the Russian Provisional Govt lead to the Bolsheviks’s
(lead by Lenin) power grab.
The civil war did not halt the annexation of smaller independent nations. The Soviet Union’s intent was to spread communism across the globe. Several communist uprisings resulted across Europe, Asia and other parts of the world. Creating chaos & unrest during the post war period.
Know your history folks. You don’t need to read volumes. Modern technology has availed us of resources that explain salient details of the period between world wars. Use it to educate yourself. We don’t have the luxury to repeat past mistakes. omniatlas.com/maps/europe/19…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For every skeptic that criticized my analysis accuracy…
Here is some crow to choke on. 🐦⬛
I said this was Russia in 2017 after verifying the reports about Trump’s involvement with Russia was accurate using reports by @MalcolmNance & @sarahkendzior.
Skepticism and refusal to accept a stay at home mom could actually figure this out reveals systemic bias & discrimination, inaccurate and naive methods of analysis and a priority to protect the egos of those paid to sound the alarm.
How did Nazis gain power in 1933? Same way they did in 2016. The people we trust to protect us failed miserably to recognize the severity of the threat and gave the public a false sense of security. For millions who are currently suffering the realization now comes too late.
But what Alberta also has is the Social Credit history that is tied to Republican politics and the fascist adjacent or fascist-like policy that comes with those credentials.
Liberalism however, incorporates a lot of beliefs and values.
Radical Progressives (or CCF) were actually part of the Liberal party a century ago. But so was the radical Social Credit party.
Both originate in Alberta. Most don’t realize it, but the radical extremism of communism and far right classic libertarianism originate here in AB.
Danielle Smith is not the mastermind of the Alberta separatism movement.
The fact Dennis Modry has bragged about $500M being made available to aid in separatist efforts should remove any doubt about where the threat is originating. It’s the US Trump Administration.
Another pipeline to the coast is a direct threat to the supply Canada provides, at a huge discount, to US refineries and US based O&G companies who moved their head offices south of the border when Kenney was still premier and Keystone XL was the priority.
Canadian energy independence and increased capacity to supply other foreign buyers puts Canadian sovereignty as the priority and removes control of the resource Alberta owns out of American hands and back into Canadian’s circle of influence.
There is every reason to ban religious belief from shaping medical practice.
When some random guy believes his faith is more relevant than trained medical physicians expertise in deciding whether a pregnancy needs to be terminated, at any week of gestation, that’s a problem.
This is not DIRECTLY about women’s health or rights. It’s about religious zealotry controlling the options available to women & physicians.
This is about imposing moral values of Christian zealots into the mainstream.
This man is overruling the medical system’s moral system.
For him, it’s not good enough that a highly educated expert physician who has years of medical training and practical experience is able to offer the option to terminate a pregnancy or not in consultation with the woman who is pregnant based on science & health concerns.
This isn’t just whining. It’s Christian nationalists laying the groundwork for theocratic government.
Charlie Kirk is a martyr to evangelical Christo-fascists in the US and now this Alberta online influencer is touting his belief in Kirk’s brand of Christianity.
The public asks why Poilievre is an unrepentant bigot and brute leader.
This is why. The people voting for CPC are not moderate conservatives. They are the angry men who believe liberals, feminists, transgender people, brown immigrants and indigenous people stole their power.
Why do they believe that white men are entitled to the top of the hierarchy? Because idiots like this are getting amplified by the algorithm on social media. Politicians are echoing more palatable versions of this narrative on university and college campuses.