On this anniversary of Pearl Harbor, an anecdote from Max Hastings' "Overlord":
Before DDay, a US officer briefed a roomful of Poles on modern war tactics. The Poles, veterans of 5 years of combat, listened dutifully. 1/x
Afterward, a Pole with a healed gash across his face, approached the American lecturer. “You omitted the most important lesson of all."
“What’s that?” asked the American.
The Pole replied: “Be the stronger one.”
2/x
Until this date, 80 years ago, there was uncertainty about how the Second World War would end. After this date, it was only a question of when - and how much suffering until the inevitable arrived. 3/x
But if the brute fact of US power decided the outcome of the war - it was much more than power that shaped the enduring peace that followed. It is American ideals and American generosity that turned former enemies into friends after war's end. 4/x
The victory won by power was secured by open trade, by collective security, by liberal institutions, and by democratic government. On this poignant anniversary, rededication to those peacetime ideals seems timelier than ever.
Congressional subpoena power was agreed in the first Congress by a committee led by James Madison that also included constitutional signatory Roger Sherman
The US is a very legalistic society. When confronted with a scandal - eg a major-party candidate for president building his campaign on assistance from the espionage agencies of a hostile foreign government - Americans instinctively look to the criminal law for help. But ...
... not every wrong thing is a crime, and even many things that might be crime cannot be proven in ways that would justify a federal criminal indictment.
That was Mueller obstacle 1.
And even when there are suspicions of crimes in a politician's past - tax evasion, money laundering - federal practice demands a strong specific indication of wrongdoing to justify an investigation. That was Mueller obstacle 2.
"What do you know about this story of Dr Fauci cutting the vocal cords out of beagles and leaving them" - the beagles - "to be eaten alive by sand flies?"
The question arose at a dinner recently. It sounded crazy, but I quickly discovered that the allegation had been spread by
With that roster of names endorsing the story, it probably won't greatly surprise you to hear that the story was arrant bullshit. politifact.com/article/2021/o…
Three months into their Watergate reporting in 1972, Woodward & Bernstein slipped up. They reported that Nixon campaign treasurer Hugh Sloan *had told a grand jury* that top Nixon aide HR Haldeman had approval over the secret fund that paid the burglars. This was not true. 1/x
Or rather, it was not exactly true. There was a secret fund. HR Haldeman did have approval rights. But Sloan had not (yet) testified to that effect to the grand jury - he had just privately confirmed the news to the two reporters. So ... an error. 2/x
Noncitizen voting was quite common in 19th century America, especially on the frontier. As this short history comments: "Many new states and territories used alien suffrage as an incentive to attract settlers." 2/x nypl.org/sites/default/…
The rules on noncitizen voting tightened in the late 19th and early 20th century, as Alexander Keyssar describes in his history of voting rights in the US 3/x ash.harvard.edu/publications/r…