One thing I'm very sure about my dad is that if he had grown up in the internet age, he would have gone down as one of the greatest poasters of all time.
He had his own unmistakable aesthetic you could see in everything he wrote. His sense of humor never left him, even when Parkinsons took his ability to speak, he would take his time, typing out a word per minute at best, just to share a silly joke. He never stopped posting.
I still can't piece his entire life story together - he didn't like to stay in one place long, he never made much money, he had a knack for finding the weirdest living spaces, whether it was someone's porch, a trailer in a backyard, or a closet.
But where ever he went he had a huge impact on the people around him, he started thriving art scenes and businesses and did writing and photography, always had some sort of constructive output.
At the end, when he couldn't do much else, he would flash a smile at the nurses helping him and they would (this happened multiple times!) pull me aside and say "your dad is the sweetest person I've ever taken care of"
Like all people, he was far from perfect. He wasn't there for his other kids childhoods, and there's no excuse for it. But I was born much later in his life, and he told me when I was young - "I was a shitty dad before, but I'm going to do it right this time"
His marriage with my mom didn't last and I think he had every inclination to leave and repeat paste mistakes. And he did briefly move to another state. But I called him up as a 10 year old and asked him to come back, and he said ok, got on a plane, and he stuck around
I'm very grateful for that, and I'm very grateful I got to be around for his final years to return the favor. I hope one day - a very long time from now! - to face death with a fraction of the grace and poise that he showed when it was his time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My take on the back and forth about the advanced child tax credits is that, as it was proposed in the AFA, where payments are only sent if your tax liability is negative, it seems likely to lead to administrative problems. 1/? peoplespolicyproject.org/2021/01/20/why…
But if we did actually copy Canada and assess eligibility entirely based on prior year income, & send checks out to everyone below the high phase-out, that would be fine. It’s not ideal because it’s less responsive to income changes, but administratively it’d avoid major fumbles
In Canada, 6% of people on last-ditch social assistance do not receive the full child benefit because it’s based on prior income. This isn’t great, & may be worse in the US where our social assistance is worse, but it’s a relatively small number of people jrf.org.uk/file/36835/dow…
The UK provides an instructive example of the administrative challenges of distributing means-tested tax credit benefits on a monthly basis. In 2003 they implemented a big Child Tax Credit and Working Tax Credit. The design is in many ways similar to current US proposals
Immediately, they ran into major overpayment problems. About 1/3rd of all benefits were overpaid, and there were reports of confusion and hardship as people had to pay back welfare debt at the end of the year
Policymakers admitted that they were blindsided by how many changes in circumstance people had over the year
No one should be in poverty simply because they have kids! Great report out today from PPP on designing a universal child benefit. peoplespolicyproject.org/2021/01/14/now…
Current child tax credits are designed to exclude the bottom 10% of tax units, and partially exclude even more.
The current tax credit regime reduces poverty a lot on paper, but this is in part due to gaming the head count poverty metric. Giving a lot of money to people right around the cutoff, while none to people in deep poverty, creates a misleading picture of effectiveness
The left has a tendency towards negativity, which 9 times out of 10 leads to the correct analysis, but also leads to missing real successes like expanded UI
That’s how you could have people calling CARES the “worst bill in 25 years”. It also reflects a general lack of focus on cash welfare on some portions of the left
When it comes to actual politicians, I think they may have been cautious about bragging about the UI generosity for fear of raising the issue of essential workers getting paid less than unemployed people. And the implementation problems also made it hard to brag about
27 year olds are the most likely age group to have medical debt, likely in part because that's the year people are removed from their parents health insurance healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.137…
Dec 15th is the deadline to enroll in ACA plans (later in many states)
If you make between 100-200% of the federal poverty line, you're probably best off with a Silver plan
Between 200-400%, you're probably best off with a Gold or Bronze
Above 400%, Bronze is likely best
In the 100-200% range ($12,760-$25,520 for an individual, $26,200-$52,400 for a family of four), you get Cost Sharing Reduction payments. You probably qualify for a free Bronze plan, but silver will most likely be a better deal healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.13…
From 200-400% FPL (up to $51,040 for an individual, $104,800 for a family of four), you're probably better off with a Bronze plan, but there's a chance that silver loading has made Gold plans particularly cheap (sometimes less than Silver), in which case it's probably worth it