People call China a "communist" country.
I say - Yes, or No.
Communism is indeed the ideal of we Chinese people, but China's Communism is different from communism defined in the West.
(1/N)
Economically, China's "socialist market economy" is more similar to the "New Nationalism" proposed by Theodore Roosevelt.
About China's economic system is not the focus of my talk today. I want to talk about the cultural core of China's communism.
(2/N)
What I want to talk about is, in fact, more than 2000 years ago, communism has become the highest ideal pursued by China's intellectuals.
Confucius (Kong Zi), the founder of Chinese Confucianism, was also considered the greatest of the ancient Chinese sages.
(3/N)
Confucius once put forward the three most important moral norms of the Chinese people - "仁 (Ren)、义 (Yi)、礼 (Li)".
仁 (Ren) - the spirit of human nature and humanity, that is, the spirit of people-oriented.
(4/N)
义 (Yi) - the fairness and justice, adhere to principles. The principle of "义 (Yi)" is often reflected in the form of law.
礼 (Li) - the country's political system also includes religious ceremonies, social customs and etiquette norms.
(5/N)
There was a famous article in Confucius' works Liji ( The Book of Li), called "The Great Together (Li Yun Da Tong)". It described Confucius' ideal Chinese society.
If you read this article carefully, you will find that Confucius described a communist society.
(6/N)
Therefore, I say that the ideal of we Chinese people, or the ideal of the CPC, is to realize the "Great Together" that our ancestors have been pursuing for thousands of years.
(7/N)
孔子:《礼运大同篇》
Confucius: “The Great Together (Li Yun Da Tong)”
大道之行也,天下为公。
When the Great Way is practiced, the world is for the public.
选贤与能。
Those with virtue and those with ability are chosen and used.
(8/N)
讲信修睦。
People value trustworthiness and cultivate harmony with each other.
故人不独亲其亲,不独子其子。
Thus people do not treat only their parents like parents, nor do people treat only their children like children.
(9/N)
使老有所终,壮有所用,幼有所长。
That makes the aged have the appropriate last years, those in their prime have the appropriate employment, and the young have the appropriate growth and development.
(10/N)
鳏寡孤独废疾者,皆有所养。
Elderly men with no spouses, widows, orphans, elderly people without children or grandchildren, the handicapped, the ill – all are provided for.
男有分,女有归。
Males have their station; females, their places to belong to.
(11/N)
货恶其弃於地也,不必藏於己。
Money is thrown on the ground and thus despised; it is not necessary to store money.
力恶其不出於身也,不必为已。
Labor is despised if it does not come from oneself, and it does not have to be on behalf of oneself.
(12/N)
是故谋闭而不兴,盗窃乱贼而不作。
Therefore people don't engage in intrigue or trickery, nor do they engage in robbery, theft, and rebellion.
故外户而不闭。
Thus, though people leave their houses they don't close their doors.
(13/N)
是谓大同。
This is called the "Great Together".
(END)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The CPC was deceived in its first contact with the US govt, which is why we cannot trust the Americans' promises.
In November 1944, the US govt sent the Dixie Mission to Yan'an to make contact with the CPC.
The photo shows Dixie Mission head David D. Barrett with Mao Zedong and Zhu De.
The Dixie Mission in Yan'an, with US Flying Fortress pilots rescued by the CPC army, November 1944.👇
Mao Zedong speaking with US journalist Harrison Forman, 1944.
Forman was a photojournalist for United Press International and the London Times.
In June 1944, he headed northwest to Yan'an with a group of journalists to do frontline reporting from the base of the CPC-led resistance against the Japanese, revealing to the world the real situation in Yan'an, and the toughness of the Eighth Route Army as it bravely resisted the Japanese at the Shaanxi, Gansu, and Ningxia border. He subsequently wrote the bestselling book Report from Red China.
NYT -
For years, theorists have posited the onset of a “Chinese century”: a world in which China finally harnesses its vast economic and technological potential to surpass the United States and reorient global power around a pole that runs through Beijing.
That century may already have dawned, and when historians look back they may very well pinpoint the early months of President Trump’s second term as the watershed moment when China pulled away and left the United States behind. nytimes.com/2025/05/19/opi…
Mr. Trump is taking a wrecking ball to the pillars of American power and innovation. His tariffs are endangering U.S. companies’ access to global markets and supply chains. He is slashing public research funding and gutting our universities, pushing talented researchers to consider leaving for other countries. He wants to roll back programs for technologies like clean energy and semiconductor manufacturing and is wiping out American soft power in large swaths of the globe. nytimes.com/2025/05/14/bus…
China’s trajectory couldn’t be more different.
It already leads global production in multiple industries — steel, aluminum, shipbuilding, batteries, solar power, electric vehicles, wind turbines, drones, 5G equipment, consumer electronics, active pharmaceutical ingredients and bullet trains. It is projected to account for 45 percent — nearly half — of global manufacturing by 2030. Beijing is also laser-focused on winning the future: In March it announced a $138 billion national venture capital fund that will make long-term investments in cutting-edge technologies such as quantum computing and robotics, and increased its budget for public research and development. reuters.com/world/china/ch…
A dictator is someone with total power over a country.
Usually, in a dictatorship country, the position of supreme leader is passed from father to the son.
(1/X)
Whereas in China, none of any 2 PR China🇨🇳 presidents even have the same family name, let along come from the same family.
So by what definition is China a dictatorship? Just because you say that Xi has the total power?
(2/X)
Some say that China is an "one party dictatorship", which is ridiculous because the communist party of China has over 90 million members.
The supreme organ of State authority of China is National People's Congress, which has around 3 thousand members.
Did u hear about the story of "Zhengguo canal" from 246 BC? State of Han engineer Zheng Guo bamboozled State of Qin's king with an "irrigation project" to drain their treasury.
Plot twist: it backfired harder than TikTok algorithms! (1/10)
Zheng sold it like a PowerPoint-wielding consultant: "Let's turn Guanzhong wasteland into Jiangnan rice paradise!"
Meanwhile, his boss Han Kingdom giggled: "Our 'fatigue Qin' plan gonna work!" Spoiler: It didn't. At all. (2/10)
When exposed mid-construction, Zheng dropped truth bombs: "Sure I'm a spy, but quitting now wastes 9 yrs' work! Finish it & your farm yields jump 6X!"
Qin king facepalmed but kept funding—turning "Bankrupt Qin" into "Buff Qin". (3/10)
This👇 was the response to my criticism several years ago by the Shanghai Govt about the opening of some school sports venues. I were very satisfied with the response.
Most Chinese, like me, we only care if our criticism works.
I criticized the govt for providing too few sports venues, and the govt staff replied to me about the reasons for this situation and how they will improve it.
My criticism worked.
So, simply criticizing the govt is meaningless, the key is to urge the govt to change.
In China, if you have any criticism, dissatisfaction or complaint about the govt... Just call 12345 (or its APP). This hotline will deal with everything.
Usually within 48 hours, the govt staff will recall you and tell you the result.
Read my thread👇
From Obama's rebalancing in the Asia-Pacific to Trump's trade war to Biden's extreme pressure and all-out confrontation, India has always stood firmly on the side of the US in this process.
But India's strategy clearly failed.
Indians, you should rely on yourselves, not the US.
India chose not to participate in RCEP.
From that day, it has clearly ruled out the possibility of obtaining China's industrial chain through normal industrial transfer.
India has clearly chosen to rely on the US and seek to obtain industrial transfer by defeating China.
After Trump second came to power, India has been calling for peace and cooperation between China and India, and for China to face up to India's national and security demands.
Because its bets over the past eight years have failed and its chips have been lost.