Johnson trying to take initiative by apologising for the clip and pretending he was ‘infuriated’ by it. Somehow doubt that will cut it. #PMQs
This, if anything, should make us even angrier. Johnson knew exactly what happened, and knew what he was doing when he spent all week lying through his teeth. He’s coming clean now because he got caught. The end.
Johnson saying people should focus on what’s happening with Covid now, as though this is a matter of historical interest. Starmer notes the current situation requires moral authority and the prime minister doesn’t have any.
Well this is interesting. Johnson just said ‘of course’ he will hand over the details of any attendees to the Metropolitan Police. Then throws in the desperate lie that Starmer (lol) wants to decriminalise Class A drugs. Johnson’s most pathetic outing I can recall.
Blackford much tougher than Starmer and directly calls for PM’s resignation. Johnson meekly says he will get on with the job. That’s the problem.
Genuinely breathtaking. In full gaslighting mode, Johnson complains how sad it is when the public need clarity on Covid and opposition parties try to ‘muddy the water’ about what happened or didn’t happen. I don’t think I have encountered anyone more shameless in my life.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Starmer going on the Downing Street Christmas party last year. Johnson doesn’t deny it and deflects by asking a question about Starmer’s party this year. Starmer reads him the government’s own rules from the time. This could quickly get interesting. #PMQs
Johnson desperate to talk about the rules *right now*. He has not denied that he held a Christmas party last year, which was in direct contravention of his own lockdown rules.
Starmer twists the knife by pointing out his own MPs not following the current rules on masks. Ties it in with his ‘one rule for us, another for them’ line of attack. This could and should be a story. #PMQs
I know the reshuffle has divided opinion but I think it’s been broadly positive. Cooper’s one of Labour’s only genuine big hitters and carries more gravitas than anyone in the government. Lammy as foreign sec a great fit. Nandy in the role she should have had from the start.
Of course Cooper is further to the right on immigration than many of us would like, but that’s where Labour is right now and Patel won’t stand a chance against her. But bizarre to relegate Thornberry and sideline Miliband. Labour needs all the star performers it can get.
Interesting too to look at some of the promotions lower down. Bridget Phillipson has been quietly devastating when attacking gov’s cruelty to children and should flourish at education. Streeting should be effective at health, but that job ought to have Allin-Khan’s name on it.
The irony of the last five years is that Theresa May’s empty slogan is the one thing that was actually true and which the British government has never managed to accept: Brexit means Brexit
Neither May nor Johnson ever accepted that Brexit came with consequences: specifically, consequences the UK would itself choose as a direct result of its policies, and which it would then have to live with.
The Northern Ireland debate has been stuck in the same unsquarable circle for five years: that if you deliberately erect a regulatory and customs border with another trading entity, it must actually go somewhere.
The people who quit GB News because it’s too populist are as much a mystery as the people who quit the Conservative Party because it’s too conservative
What do these people think they’re signing up for? Why do they always insist against the obvious reality? Why is it so hard for an insider to understand something nakedly transparent to everyone else?
It’s a serious question, by the way. You used to see it when people quit UKIP because it was too xenophobic or now when people resign as advisers to the Tories because they aren’t taking race or LGBT rights seriously enough. What evidence did they ever have to the contrary?
Seriously: what more must Boris Johnson do to show Red Wall voters that he despises them?
It’s a serious point because it cuts to everything Johnson is. These moments are not slip-ups. They’re fresh gambits in the permanent game of satisfying Johnson’s adrenaline narcissism.
Johnson’s shtick is not to do a good job, change people’s lives or effect substantive policy. It is to make fools of the people who support him - to push them, fail them, humiliate them and still retain their support. This is the heart of the con. And he’s still pulling it off.