It's been 8 months since the NYT claimed the DOJ was investigating "whether" @MattGaetz committed crimes. He's still not been charged with anything, and thus has no chance to contest the innuendo, yet millions believe he's guilty. That's why prosecutorial leaks are so abusive.
Leave aside what you think about Gaetz or his politics. It's unethical and often even illegal for prosecutors to leak accusations to the media precisely because it destroys people's reputations without having to prove their guilt.
Amazingly: the year-long investigative reporting we did in Brazil that freed Lula -- which the left cheered -- focused on this. Prosecutors leaked allegations to media outlets which destroyed their enemies' reputations, then often did not bring charges:
After our reporting about prosecutorial abuses began, Brazil's largest paper -- @folha -- apologized for doing what the NYT did here: receiving leaks from prosecutors and trumpeting accusations without knowing if they were true, destroying reputations.
It's possible Gaetz will be charged tomorrow. It's possible he'll be convicted of everything they've attached to his name. But right now, he's been tried by media mob - for 9 months - with no chance to defend himself. This is why prosecutorial leaks are such an abuse of power.
Obviously, many are reluctant to raise civil liberties and abuse of power concerns in the Gaetz case even though they're glaring. As I know from experience, the second you do, smear artists accuse you of being a pedophile apologist or sex predator. But these principles are vital.
If there's evidence of Matt Gaetz's guilt, charge him with crimes, accord him the due process the Constitution guarantees, and send him to prison if a jury finds him guilty. As of now, the only apparent crimes seem to be from these leaking prosecutors:
One of the major revelations of our investigative exposés in Brazil -- which the left cheered -- was how prosecutors illegally leaked investigations to corporate media, which published them without knowing if they were true, destroying reputations. Often, no charges were brought:
This is exactly the same thing as the NYT did in the Matt Gaetz case. *Nine months ago*, the paper published an article announcing the DOJ was "investigating" Gaetz to see "whether" he paid a 17-year-old girl for sex. Still no charges, while the cloud hangs over his head.
As I detailed in the video report I did on the Gaetz case yesterday for Rumble, a Brazilian paper apologized for what NYT did here: trumpet leaked allegations before charges were even brought. Often charges never were. It's journalistically reckless:
Julian Assange -- the most persecuted journalist in the west -- is still in a high-security prison in the UK because the Biden DOJ appealed the British judge's rejection of the US extradition request, demanding he be imprisoned while the appeal pends. The ruling will be tomorrow:
While the US and UK keep Julian Assange in a cage for the crime of reporting accurately about the crimes of those governments, every sermon issued by US and British officials about the sanctity of press freedom and attacks by other countries is and should be regarded as a joke.
Julian Assange is the real embodiment of an actual dissident, a brave warrior against corrupt power centers, the hero which so many online posers pretend to be.
That's the difference between posers and real threats to power: the latter are attacked, prosecuted and targeted.
-- "President Zelenskyy? This is Joe Biden. I have some good news and bad news. Which do you want first?"
-- "The bad news, Mr. President"
-- "The bad news is most Americans think it's lunacy to go to war with Russia. The good news is a Media Matters battalion is on the way."
By the way, is it at all notable that Crimea became part of Russia during the Obama administration, and now Russia is supposedly preparing to invade Ukraine during the Biden administration, but never did either when they had their blackmail-controlled puppet in the White House?
A bizarre and abrupt reversal by scientists regarding COVID's origins, along with clear conflicts of interest, create serious doubts about their integrity. Yet major outlets keep relying on them: Peter Daszak, desperate to deny a "lab leak," but others who are highly compromised.
One of the most bizarre and still-unexplained episodes in the COVID pandemic was the group of scientists who told Fauci in late January they concluded COVID came from a lab. Within days, they publicly recanted, then received millions in grants from NIAID, controlled by Fauci.
Foi uma honra poder passar alguns dias com uma mulher, Luisa Mell, que dedicou tanto de sua vida à proteção dos animais, uma causa central para mim e David.
It was an honor to be able to spend a few days with Luisa Mell, who has devoted her life to the protection of animals.
Se você está em São Paulo e está pensando em adotar um cachorro ou um gato, o instituto dela é inspirador - e tem lindos animais. E se você está no Rio (Maricá), nosso abrigo, @abrigo_hope, tb tem.