The real news of the day:

- Committee let Mark Meadows know it had him nailed

- He turned over incriminating evidence against the Trump White House to try to save himself, before backing out

- Meadows’ suit is a distraction to keep Trump from noticing that he’s sold him out
So why did Meadows back out? Did Trump threaten him with even uglier criminal dirt than what the committee has on him? Is Meadows just that wishy washy?

Either way, the damage to Trump world is done. Meadows can’t just magically take the evidence back from the committee.
Meadows clearly expects to be prosecuted for underlying election-related crimes, or he wouldn’t have even briefly flipped on others.

Trouble for him is he’d have to cut a deal with the committee, DOJ, the DA in Georgia, all of them.

Now he’ll also be prosecuted for contempt.
In that context, Meadows’ book – which mostly praises Trump but also has a few big embarrassing pieces of dirt about him – seems to have been an attempt at funding his legal defense with a book just controversial enough to sell well, but not controversial enough to enrage Trump.
Meadows has been trying to perfectly thread the narrow needle of cooperating without incriminating himself, selling out Trump without enraging Trump, and so on. It would have been difficult even for a smart person to pull off. Meadows, an idiot, has failed spectacularly at it.
So what happens now?

Meadows will soon be indicted for contempt, and it’ll only get worse for him from there. His life is shattered.

The committee will take the evidence Meadows provided against the others, and use it to try to scare them into cooperating. Someone will cave.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

11 Dec
The Trump regime’s plot to overthrow the election consisted of pressuring Mike Pence to wave a magic wand that didn’t exist. You don’t have to give Pence any credit for refusing to go along with it, because there was nothing for Pence to go along with.
The most Pence could have done was verbally object to the certification, which the Senate would have certified anyway. And if Trump didn’t like it, the courts would have immediately laughed in his face. There was literally nothing Pence could have done to keep Trump in office.
And Pence knew all of this, which is why he didn’t bother futilely making a fool of himself. He knew it was a desperate and defeated Trump asking him to wave a magic wand that simply did not exist outside of Trump’s hallucinatory mind.
Read 6 tweets
10 Dec
Thank you Ari Melber for acknowledging on MSNBC just now that Mitch McConnell is not some omnipotent figure who always wins, and that in reality he often blinks or loses battles. Palmer Report has been hammering home this fact all year.
McConnell often wins, and he often loses. He’s very savvy but he doesn’t have a magic wand. Yet for years the media (on the left and right) has falsely portrayed McConnell as always getting his way on everything, by simply not covering the numerous times he’s lost or caved.
Why would the media misrepresent this? The usual answer: ratings.

Right wingers like to be told they’re winning, so right wing media always insists McConnell is winning.

Liberals respond to being told they’re losing, so liberal media also always insists McConnell is winning.
Read 10 tweets
10 Dec
Wealthy and powerful people like Trump generally get away with crimes by finding a way to not get indicted to begin with, and they have various ways to pull that off. But once they do get indicted, they tend to go down. Even fancy lawyers usually won't get you off at trial.
Trump is under criminal investigation in three jurisdictions, two of which have reached the grand jury stage.

If Trump gets indicted for financial crimes (Manhattan or Westchester), or gets indicted for election tampering (Georgia), there is every reason to expect he'll go down.
The wealthy and powerful person's main tool for not getting indicted is to keep crimes a secret. Paying others do to the crimes, paying to cover it up, so prosecutors don't even know to look for anything.

For Trump, that ship has already sailed. Prosecutors are clearly onto him.
Read 11 tweets
10 Dec
The doomsday types are already insisting Jason Miller won't go through with cooperating. That misses the point. The committee has set precedent that you have to turn over valuable evidence just to buy yourself time. And if Miller backs out, he goes to prison for contempt anyway.
So if the committee is sticking to its own precedent, Miller must have already turned over valuable evidence just to get his contempt deadline pushed back slightly. That would be a win for the committee whether Miller ends up fully cooperating or not.
Just as the committee's dealings with Mark Meadows were win for the committee, because Meadows turned over the texts and powerpoint stuff before backing out. And now Meadows will go to prison for contempt anyway. As will Miller if he backs out.
Read 6 tweets
10 Dec
Way too many people on our side think they're being "vigilant" by assigning magical powers to the bad guys, and insisting the bad guys are going to win no matter what.

That's NOT vigilance. It's self defeating idiocy. It just emboldens the bad guys come at us harder.
When you behave like this, you are working full-time for Donald Trump, whether you realize it or not.

The biggest gift you can give Trump world is to keep telling them that next time they'll win for sure.

You want to defeat them? Call out their weakness and break their spirit.
We have an entire industry of liberal doomsday pundits who have built their careers by brainwashing our side into believing "vigilance" means spending all day staring paralyzed in fear at their scary predictions and/or angrily foaming at the mouth about how were going to lose.
Read 5 tweets
10 Dec
The PowerPoint presentation proves two things:

1) The election overthrow plot was hilariously inept and had zero chance of even coming close to working.

2) It was nonetheless a treason plot involving the uppermost levels of the Trump regime.

These two things can both be true.
Just because someone commits a crime like treason or election fraud in an ineptly stupid way that has zero chance of achieving any of the stated goals, it doesn’t mitigate the crime that was committed. It’s still treason and election fraud.
That said, the whole plot was just so obviously never going to keep Trump in office. Even if they had succeeded in killing Pence, for instance, it still wouldn’t have magically resulted in Trump getting a second term. But a treason plot that’s guaranteed to fail is still treason.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(