Just so I have this clear, the PM has implemented further restrictions in order to shift the story from one about a party which he says didn't happen, and after apologizing to for the fact that people may have been offended by a clip of people joking about the non-party. 1/
Meanwhile though the real villains are the people wanting to know if Downing Street did break restrictions last year and hold a party, at the exact same time as telling the public that they couldn't see loved ones, because they are "playing politics".
But it is all okay though, because Johnson has appointed someone who may have been at the non-party to investigate if the non-party happened, but only the one non-party, and definitely not the one which people say the PM personally attended.
And they have already had someone resign for making a joke about the party , which wasn't a party, but didn't attend the party, but the bloke who actually made the crack about the party to which she responded isn't resigning.
Does that pretty much sum up where we are? What a farce? I agree with restrictions, but hardly anyone is going to follow them when it is so blatant that the government doesn't give a toss and is just deflecting from itself.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
