1/9
Interesting article. An economy's "real" wealth is the total value of goods and services it produces. While there are problems with the way GDP measures this, GDP growth is a rough but mostly unbiased proxy for the growth in England's real wealth.
ft.com/content/68b06c…
2/9
According to World Bank data, English GDP rose in real terms by 1.2% a year between 2000 and 2020. According to this article, however, the value of English real estate rose in real terms by 3.0% a year during the period, or two and a half times faster than GDP.
3/9
Unless there has been a substantial increase in the production of goods and services associated with real estate – and one that has not shown up at all in the GDP data – then clearly there has been a transfer of wealth In England.
4/9
As this article shows, this transfer has hugely benefitted the rich, who save most of their income, at the expense of the rest, who consume most of their income. One result of this has been a surge in household debt.
scholar.harvard.edu/files/straub/f…
5/9
This transfer must be reversed at some point because, in the end, asset prices can temporarily diverge from their real values, but never permanently. The way in which it is reversed however can be politically and economically very painful.
6/9
If this were just happening in England, it would be worrying enough, but it is also happening in the US and many other large economies, and to an even greater extent in places like China and Australia, where housing prices have soared at rates rarely before seen.
7/9
Previous cases in history of an unbalanced surge in real-estate prices make it clear that this can go on a long time before it reverses, but these cases also suggest that the longer it goes on, the more painful the ultimate reversal.
8/9
It seems to me that governments can both speed up the adjustment process and reverse the income distribution effect by aggressively implementing land taxes, but in the end if the cause...
9/9
of soaring housing prices is excess liquidity in the financial system, reversing this liquidity is likely to be the only sustainable solution.
This McKinsey report on global wealth is useful for this discussion.

mckinsey.com/industries/fin…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

10 Dec
1/4
Thoughtful piece by Caixin on the end, at least for now, of the traditional relationship between USD and RMB. Until quite recently, the strength of RMB vs USD was inversely related to USD versus all currencies.
caixinglobal.com/2021-12-09/yua…
2/4
This shouldn't be a big surprise. It just means that contrary to what many seem to think the RMB no longer trades against the dollar, but rather against a basket of currencies, something we've long known. But this inverse relationship has changed in the past few months.
3/4
As USD strengthened, RMB strengthened against USD, which means it has soared against the basket. The reason, it seems pretty clear, is that trade and financial inflows into China have surged, making it very hard to keep the RMB from rising, even against a rising USD.
Read 4 tweets
9 Dec
1/7
Even bank analysts, who should know better, are confusing rising trade surpluses with rising export growth, and are suggesting that slower increases in China's exports next year should result in smaller surpluses.
scmp.com/economy/china-… via @scmpnews
2/7
Export growth may indeed slow next year as more countries resume normal supply chain operations, but if the trade surplus contracts, the latter will have very little to do with the former.
3/7
China's trade surplus has surged in the past two years mainly because household income growth has continued to lag GDP growth, and this has pushed up the overall savings rate just as Beijing was trying to rein in non-productive investment.
Read 7 tweets
7 Dec
1/6
You have to be very careful about using year-on-year data after a year like 2020. According to Reuters (and lots of other news agencies) "China's exports growth lost steam in November, pressured by a strong yuan, weakening demand and higher costs."
reuters.com/world/china/ch…
2/6
But this isn't true at all. Chinese exports grew more rapidly month on month in November than they did in October, and in fact Chinese exports grew at one of the fastest month-on-month paces in two years.
3/6
Exports also grew more rapidly over a two-year period in November than they did in October. That is why I'd argue that export growth actually accelerated in November rather than "lost steam". So why are Reuters and so many others saying otherwise?
Read 6 tweets
6 Dec
1/8
People often argue that because China is the world's growth engine, any slowdown in the Chinese economy will hurt growth in the rest of the world. Here Ruchir Sharma suggests that while this may have been true in the past, it is less true today.
ft.com/content/1d3782…
2/8
I've long argued however that this was never really true. While China has been the biggest arithmetical component of global growth for many years, this doesn't make it a "growth engine" in any meaningful sense.
3/8
On the contrary, because China's balance of payments acts as a mechanism that absorbs demand from the rest of the world and recycles it mainly in the form of unwanted savings, China actually restrains growth in the rest of the world.
Read 9 tweets
6 Dec
1/5
According to the China section of the Treasury Department's biannual report to Congress, published Friday, "China’s headline foreign exchange reserves increased by $102 billion in the four quarters through June 2021, standing at $3.2 trillion."
home.treasury.gov/system/files/2…
2/5
"In contrast," it continues, "over the same period monthly changes in the PBOC’s foreign exchange assets recorded no significant changes, increasing by only $6.2 billion. Meanwhile, monthly net foreign exchange settlement data, another proxy measure for...
3/5
foreign exchange intervention that includes the activities of China’s state-owned banks, recorded net foreign exchange purchases of nearly $278 billion (1.7% of GDP) in the four quarters through June 2021, adjusted for changes in outstanding forwards."
Read 7 tweets
5 Dec
1/8
China Daily says that cutting tariffs on Chinese goods would help curb US inflation, and cites a gamut of US experts who agree that tariffs on Chinese goods "certainly" contribute to higher US prices.
global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202112/03/WS…
2/8
That might at first seem obvious, but it's just lazy thinking. The reason I've always opposed Trump's tariffs is because while they might affect bilateral imbalances, in today's hyperglobalized world they would have no effect on overall US deficits or Chinese surpluses.
3/8
That's because the former were driven by the US role in absorbing excess global savings, and the latter by China's domestic demand deficiencies. Because tariffs would barely affect either, they would have no impact on either country's overall trade imbalances.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(