Since I've started talking more about politics, I've gotten a range of reactions. Some folks think I'm ridiculous for caring about electoral politics, and, fair enough. I used to agree. Then I got more involved in labour and saw how politics puts its stain on everything.
Wanna bargain? The law governs what you can bargain about. Wanna strike? The law governs when, where, and how you can strike. Want a higher salary? The government decides how much food is on the table, then unions argue over scraps.
And there are some folks who will argue that labour laws are made to be broken, and that's fine. But lots of the folks who are in those labour groups have families and responsibilities, and different risk tolerances. Not everyone feels they can take the same stands.
I'm an idealist about democracy, so that's the path I chose. When someone doesn't participate in the political sphere, they amplify the voices of those who do. That's why I suggested joining a party. Don't like the party? Help change the party.
If you don't vote, then everyone else's is worth just a little more. When you don't pay attention, the people paying attention get a louder say. So I say take part. Believe whatever you want to believe, but I honestly believe we ignore politics at our peril.
And feel free to think I'm wrong. But if you think I'm wrong, engage with me. I'm on here trying to learn. I view twitter as a public forum where folks can share their views. I'm sharing mine, and I'm completely open to hearing others'.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Since the SP took power, education in this province has changed dramatically, but also quietly. Most of those changes have come about as a direct result of a massive erosion in funding. How’d it happen? How has the government convinced people this is okay? Join me for a thread…
The SP took power in 2007. What did education funding look like then? Well, it was regional. School Boards set local property tax rates to meet local needs. The Sask Party had a huge problem with this. Because it meant that urban divisions had access to larger pools of funds.
Sask has always had an urban-rural split, which the SP exploited to gain power. Playing on the idea of urban school being much wealthier made them political hay. But, like everything they do, it doesn’t really tell the tale. Urban divisions need more money, for a lot of reasons.
So I wanted to talk a bit about the climate today, and how our government seems to have no interest at all in dealing with it. So I tried to read through the official climate plan, and…hoo boy. It’s a real piece of work. A thread.
When you follow the link, you’re shown the single stupidest chart you’ll see in your entire life. Comparing a small province to the entire global population is intentionally misleading. You’re then treated to a video of Brad Wall talking about the plan.
I know it's an older news release, but not much as changed and Moe has barely talked about the plan. I mean, he promised a new “made in Saskatchewan plan” as soon as possible. In March. So, don't hold your breath.
QP Time! Buckle up for a thread, friends! Meili rises first and asks about Moe’s hug an anti-vaxxer for Christmas campaign. Then asks about the modelling for Omicron. Merriman says the plan is status quo. So basically we’re just hoping for the best. No mention of modelling.
QP: Meili asks about modelling again. And why the SHA leaders are leaving again. This may be my inexperience talking, but sometimes Meili asks like four questions at a time. Then we settle on asking about a public inquiry again.
QP: Merriman points to us having the lowest per capita cases in Canada. Which, if you look at this specific moment in time, true. But it doesn’t really tell the tale.
I see tweets like this, and I get so frustrated. Because the person tweeting this knows exactly what they're doing. They're intentionally misunderstand to move the conversation from gun rights and safety, to talking about the tweet. It's cheap politics, and it works. Short thread
These folks never play defence. They just say more and more extreme things. That way, instead of talking about gun safety, we talk about this weird pseudo-conflict that she basically made up. The idea of banning a band because they hold difference values from you? We all know...
it's ridiculous, so we engage. We ratio the hell out of it. But is that productive? I honestly don't know. I'm putting it to you folks. When somebody says something so confidently and incorrectly, it's hard to leave it alone. But if you call her on it....
The row with the Ag Producers get me thinking a bit about the way the Sask Party consults, or doesn't. And about how governments get out of touch. Let's talk about it. A thread...
I started teaching in 2007. The year Brad Wall came into power. And oh boy did he make promises. Check out the attached summary of the 2007 election promises. Balanced budget requirement (abandoned), tying civil service increases to population...
growth (we aren't even close), fixed election dates (surprise pandemic election, anyone?), and a ban on pre-election government advertising (I actually laughed out loud when I read that one). So how does a government completely walk away from everything it said it'd do?
This article has me furious. 96000 people in this province make under 15$/hour. Our government has no intention of doing anything about this. How can we as a province look at ourselves in the mirror knowing that someone can work full time and still... globalnews.ca/news/8425725/s…
Be making 9000$/year below the poverty line? This is insulting. This is condemning people to poverty. How can we claim hard work is the path out of poverty when we have clear evidence that you can work full time and still be poor?
But our government doesn't care. They hide behind rules that they wrote and claim to be powerless to help. They indexed the minimum wage. So it doesn't get reviewed regularly like it does in other provinces. They just hide behind the rule and claim to be powerless to help.