The Foreign Affairs piece on Xi's New World Order: Can China Remake the International System? is finally moving in the right direction but Galaxy Brains have a long long way to fully grasp the problem and understand how to respond to it. Follow me a second 1/n
The piece lays out very realistically how China is changing the world for the worse if you believe in democratic liberalism. There are three problems with the piece. First, China already has REMADE the international system. That is fait accompli. The piece does not go far 2/n
Enough recognizing how cooked the frog is. The UN, WHO, WTO, on and on are under effective Chinese control and this was the result of work that started decades ago, not a year or two ago. Second, this same exact piece could have been written two years ago and except updating 3/n
Specific points would be the same exact piece. Why do I say two years ago? Two years a professor who is now in the Biden administration planning how to deal with China wrote how China was not out to export its system or revise the international system or order. This leads to 4/n
The last point. Third, there is no plan or interest here or else where for sustained action to challenge and confront China. I viewed Trump as the first step a down payment if you will on moving on China. Make no mistake it was imperfect but my biggest critique was that they 5/n
Did not go big ENOUGH against China. Oddly, many of Biden's biggest supporters said the same exact thing. They were the real China hawks, we are better suited to challenge China. We are in the midst of an ongoing quiet roll back of US policies on China. At the same time 6/n
we have added Chinese companies to the entity list, we are handing out waivers for those same EXACT companies to actually code a USG backed system for 5G. At the same time we are diplomatically boycotting Beijing Olympics, the Biden administration is lobbying to keep 7/n
Uyghur forced labor. On and on and on. There is lots of public symbolism but behind the scenes the policies and tools needed to challenge China are being hollowed out. On and on and on. So why does this matter? Two reasons. I do not want to even entertain military conflict 8/n
So what we need is to raise pressure on China across the board. Turn the pressure up little by little. China is not a competitor. China is an adversary. Period. Second, I am a firm believer that most decisions especially in government do not have immediate effect but 9/n
Start showing up 1-3 years later. As business leaders tell you, if you have a good year, its normally because of things you started the year or two before not because you woke up this year and were smarter. Trump laid a good table for the Biden people to take over 10/n
In that there was a lot of good material to push the issues, leverage created, and areas to take advantage of. At best we are doing nothing more than standing still for the past year. At worst, we are looking at a moderate roll back with no urgency or interest in pushing 11/n
China and other authoritarians like Russia or Iran. The reality is Galaxy Brains remain years behind the reality of what needs to happen and policies that need to be enacted now to create a better environment for the US to push 1-3 years in the future. Done.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Professor Howitzer Balding 大老板

Professor Howitzer Balding 大老板 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BaldingsWorld

11 Dec
A fundamental of a color blind society is whether two individuals or groups of different racial or ethnic background are treated in similar ways before the law and in society. As some are so lightly throwing around charges if racism around any thing looking critically at 1/n
China's involvement in key US institutions let's take the MIT example and use an existing comparison to see if charges if racism stand up. For many years, Russian individuals and institutions have been involved with MIT and Boston technology firms. In the second Obama 2/n
Adminstration (not blaming at all only for dating purposes) MIT and Boston had numerous notable involvement with Russians from a notable kleptocrat stepping down from the MIT board of trustees to the FBI very publicly taking about Russian attempts to purchase sensitive 3/n
Read 9 tweets
5 Dec
This is the original WaPo trash piece about whether Biden gets more negative coverage than Trump. Let me explain why it is trash and warn you now this has near zero to do with anything partisan so just warning you now 1/n
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Sentiment analysis is a run of the mill tool, and there are different flavors out there, that seems to classify a language dataset as more positive or negative. The WaPo article doesn't specify which one they used but I'll assume it's one of the standard ones and no funny biz 2/n
It sounds complicated but what it does, (oversimplifying here), is count up positive and negative words and then calculate whether the article was more positive or negative. Different flavors can tweak the calculation in different ways that are pretty accepted but pretty 3/n
Read 11 tweets
2 Dec
In addition to Biden lobbying the Biden adminstration for Coke, wrap your mind around that for a minute, there is a bigger issue at play here journalists will never understand. So key me break it down for you 1/n
The Uyghur forced labor bill basically treats all products produced in Xinjiang as coming from the fruit of forced labor and therefore sanctionable when traded internationally to the US subjecting the firms not just to product loss but penalties. With me so far? 2/n
So ask yourself: why is Coke lobbying AGAINST the Uyghur Forced Labor Act? They have no bottling plant in Xinjiang. They don't export Coke from China to the US (I mean we aren't that fat). So why does Coke even care about the Uyghur Bill? They are acting directly at the 3/n
Read 4 tweets
29 Nov
I see lots of people gasping outloud at this "exclusive" when it is really a great big yawn though I know journos wouldn't know or understand the difference. Let me explain 1/ reuters.com/technology/exc…
First, we know that China has had facial recognition in cameras for many years. Second, we know China has had a vast network of surveillance cameras in urban areas and increasing into rural areas for years. Third, by the transitive property and by databases we have obtained 2/n
We know that China can watch targeted individuals in real time as they walk across a city for instance. Fourth, within these databases the facial recognition system not only links to individual information such as id number, passport number, facial measurements etc. 3/n
Read 8 tweets
29 Nov
Because unlike journalists I actually want to highlight facts and make corrections, I am going to highlight a story that I Tweeted out that now appears to not be true but not entirely untrue and illustrate how news spreads on the internet. So follow me a minute 1/n
A few days ago, I tweeted out a news report from Africa that China was taking over the Entebbe airport for Kampala, Uganda. The credible local outlet reported that China was taking it over so I was not claiming something not in the news report 2/n
This report seems to stem from another East African news paper claiming the same thing in the headline. The story however is sparse on specific details primarily noting that China refused to renegotiate 3/n theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/business/h…
Read 13 tweets
26 Nov
There are a couple of specific issues I find so appalling about academia and the university on everything with China. First, they are the polite plausible deniability apologists for the CCP. Mind you they are not Global Times apologists they are more pernicious because 1/n
It does not sound like rank apologism. They will say things like"we are concerned about..." or "human rights issues continue to..." but they continue to treat CCP money like any other dollar and do nothing to actually challenge the problem or put anything at risk. 2/n
Consequently out of that same mouth they will call for engagement and need to work together and better understand. This is a more dangerous form of apologia because while it may nod at the problem it urges speeding up on the road to hell. There is a second season 3/n
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(