Greg Sargent Profile picture
Dec 9, 2021 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1) Mark Meadows is suing the 1/6 committee, claiming it has no "legitimate legislative purpose" in subpoenaing him for documents about Trump's coup.

I'm having some dark thoughts about this. In a hidden way, this has very ominous implications.

*THREAD*

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
2) The 1/6 committee has lots of valid legislative purposes. To name just two:

* Reforming the ECA to prevent another coup

* Tightening oversight on WH-DOJ communications.

These are both serious soft spots in our system that Trump corruptly exploited.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
3) But Trump and Meadows say none of these constitute a valid legislative purpose.

In response to this effort to overthrow our political system, we should do nothing meaningful to safeguard against another coup attempt.

Nothing.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
4) Right now a big question is whether 10 GOP senators can support any of these reforms.

The answer is almost certainly no.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
5) But if Trump/Meadows build their entire defense around the idea that the coup attempt was defensible or even just, and we don’t need to respond to it at all, it becomes even less likely that even a few GOP senators will support any reforms at all.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
6) And so, after this effort to overturn our political order through extensive corrupt pressure on many government actors, and then through lethal mob violence, we’ll likely do nothing.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
7) The idea that the entire GOP would coalesce around this as their overarching goal after all we've lived through, while rolling out the carpet for Trump to run *again,* is pretty extraordinary.

But it's getting normalized as we speak.

Full case here:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GregTSargent

May 18
Media coverage of Republicans stampeding to NYC to attack Trump's trial as illegitimate is marred by euphemism. This isn't just "currying favor" with Trump or "expressing loyalty" or auditioning to be his veep. It's placing Trump over the rule of law. 1/

newrepublic.com/article/181682…

Image
Image
Rs are attacking the judge, witnesses, prosecutors and trial as illegitimate. This isn't just helping Trump evade the gag order. The point is also to display in spectacle form that their fealty is to him over the rules that make the system function. 2/

newrepublic.com/article/181682…

Image
Image
It's a larger pattern: Rs are declaring this higher fealty to Trump over our institutions on many fronts. Now that Trump has in effect declared the 2024 election will not be legitimate unless he wins, many Rs are using similar language. 3/

(h/t @jbouie)

newrepublic.com/article/181682…
Image
Read 6 tweets
May 16
News --> Clarence Thomas still won't clarify whether he repaid the principal on a $260,000 loan from a rich friend that he used to buy his RV, Sens Wyden and Whitehouse say. If loan was forgiven, they argue, it should have been reported as taxable income:
newrepublic.com/article/181627…
Clarence Thomas' lawyer sent a letter to Sens Wyden and Whitehouse saying the loan agreement between Thomas and Anthony Welters (valued at $80 million) has been "satisfied."

That's not good enough. As Wyden says: "Did he ever repay the principal?"

newrepublic.com/article/181627…

Image
Image
“Your client’s refusal to clarify how the loan was resolved raises serious concerns regarding violations of federal tax laws,” Wyden/Whitehouse write to Thomas' lawyer.

If loan was forgiven, they say, it should have been noted on financial disclosure.

newrepublic.com/article/181627…

Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
May 14
On today's pod, a top Biden campaign pollster, Jef Pollock, talks to me at length about NYT poll/other data showing Trump ahead. He acknowledges Trump's lead among young/nonwhites but argues it's inherently soft support.

Tons of stuff in this interview 👇
newrepublic.com/article/181532…
In our interview, Biden pollster Jef Pollock acknowledges "all the data consistently shows our campaign needs to do better with younger voters, with black voters, with Hispanic voters," and says Biden camp can/will put in the work needed to win them back:
newrepublic.com/article/181532…
Key from Biden pollster Jef Pollock: NYT poll/other data shows Biden camp getting support of white voters that they "need to get," so much of Trump's support is concentrated among black/Latino/young. That's easier to reverse BUT will take tons of work:
newrepublic.com/article/181532…
Read 6 tweets
May 11
NEWS --> Sen Sheldon Whitehouse tells me Dems are likely to investigate revelations about Trump soliciting $1 billion from Big Oil execs while corruptly vowing to fulfill their biggest policy demands.

This would be via the Budget Committee. 1/

newrepublic.com/article/181493…
“The phrase that instantly came to mind as I was reading the story was ‘quid pro quo,’” Sen Sheldon Whitehouse tells me about WaPo report on Trump's $1 billion Big Oil shakedown.

This would be extension of Budget Committee hearings into oil industry. 2/

newrepublic.com/article/181493…

Image
Image
The key here is Trump apparently made a range of explicit policy promises while soliciting a precise amount in donations.

I interviewed good government types who explained why this is so alarming and merits a Congressional investigation. See below. 3/

newrepublic.com/article/181493…

Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
May 8
In this response to NYT/Joe Kahn fiasco, I try to pinpoint five conventions of political reporting that obscure the Trump threat and work against Kahn's own stated goal of informing voters.

First, the "two different realities on democracy" fallacy:

newrepublic.com/article/181353…

Image
Image
Second, the failure to clearly describe Trump's plan to cancel prosecutions of himself and other elements of his legal strategy as threats to the system itself, that is, as efforts to put himself above the law:

newrepublic.com/article/181353…

Image
Image
As an example of number 2, look how @nytpolitics today describes Trump's plan to end prosecutions of himself. NYT editors: Do you really think casual readers will grasp how abnormal/threatening to the system this is? Tell them what the stakes truly are.

nytimes.com/2024/05/07/us/…
Image
Read 7 tweets
May 4
If Mike Johnson and Rs are going to hold hearings blaming Dems for campus antisemitism, then Dems should use them to highlight:

*GOP's antisemitic Soros smears
*Trump dinner with antisemite Nick Fuentes
*GOP embrace of Great Replacement Theory

New piece:
newrepublic.com/article/181295…
Mike Johnson, James Comer, and Marjorie Taylor Greene have all suggested George Soros and/or globalist elites are behind the protests.

“These are House Republicans who did not condemn Trump for having dinner with a neo-Nazi," @RepDanGoldman tells me.

newrepublic.com/article/181295…

Image
Image
Dems could also use the hearings to voice core principles: It's possible to call out antisemitism while also insisting it's not antisemitic to criticize Israel's war conduct. Or that one can call out violence while also condemning police overreaction.

newrepublic.com/article/181295…


Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(