a learning curve for silicon solar cells...from 1972

when cumulative capacity was just 600 kW (today it is more than a million times higher)

most capacity back then was in space industry

if I read this right, they fit a learning rate of 31% or 21% depending on point selection
Most solar learning curves start much later, so it's nice to back-fill to the beginning, see e.g. this example

The 1972 learning curve is from the paper "Historical development of solar cells" by M. Wolf.

It's a fun, brief read.

Here's a scan:

nworbmot.org/historical_dev…
He ends with:

"As the history of the solar cell has shown so clearly, the development of events can easily differ from forecasts made on the basis of insufficient information."
h/t Prof. Martin Green

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Gr…

who told @ChristianOnRE about it, I just dug it out of the @TUBerlin library 😉

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Brown

Tom Brown Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nworbmot

17 Jun
how to avoid (panic about) declining market value of wind and solar

OR

how I learned to stop worrying about market value & love shadow prices

a DUAL perspective on a primal problem

new paper by @ReichenbergLina and me:

doi.org/10.1016/j.enec…
summary:

traditional "primal" view says low-marginal-cost wind and solar push down market prices when they produce a lot, suppressing revenue

we present another "dual" point of view: it is subsidies that suppress revenue, not variability

both are correct, but framing matters!
since market value decline is flip side of pushing in VRE with quotas/subsidies, it is a result of policy choice

we can also fix the problem by changing policy: by drawing in VRE (and other low-C gens) with carbon pricing instead

this avoids market value decline even at 100%
Read 30 tweets
22 May
- Learning effects lead to path dependency

- Including learning in your model => many distinct local optima

=> Diverse choice of low-cost future energy systems

- Can't just look at one

Conclusions from Niclas Mattsson's pioneering work in 1990s:

research.chalmers.se/en/publication…

1/12
(above graphic is from @MichaelGrubb9's fabulous book "Planetary Economics", downloadable here: climatestrategies.org/publication/pl…)
So what did Niclas do?

He ran an energy model with built-in learning curves and showed that with exactly the same model (same equations, all same data inputs, costs, etc.) you can get radically different energy pathways with similar total costs:
Read 13 tweets
30 Mar
Great to see this paper on long-duration electricity storage:

- Storage energy cost & efficiency critical

- Needs <= 50 USD/kWh to be relevant next to VRE, batteries, "firm" gen

- Needs <= 1 USD/kWh (e.g. salt cavern for hydrogen storage) to make serious dents in "firm" gen
I'd also be interested in the question posed the other way round: what is the value of "firm" clean generation in the presence of VRE, batteries and long-term storage?

E.g. how much does system cost reduce by adding nuclear/CCS etc. to wind+solar+batteries+hydrogen.
Either way, the system costs of all these options is in a similar ball park, which throws up the question:

What do we actually want?

What can we build quickly, with wide public approval?
Read 5 tweets
22 Oct 20
C. Darwin: an "admirable speech"

In 1863, William Armstrong advocates:

- end of coal
- efficiency
- electrification
- renewables (he developed first hydro power)
- open data
- technological learning ("tendency of progress is to quicken progress")

vimeo.com/75975295
You can read more about him here:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_A…

williamarmstrong.info

And in @henrietta999's biography "Magician of the North".

Don't know if there is a transcript of the speech floating around anywhere (if not, we should transcribe one!).

His speech inspired the first suggestion I know of for green hydrogen (renewables + electrolysis of water to make hydrogen):

Read 6 tweets
17 Oct 20
Last thread on history of renewables + hydrogen (promise):

TL;DR:

- Idea of using electrolysis of water & storing hydrogen is almost as old as electrolysis (1789)

- Already a lively debate in *1863* about combining variable renewables with electrolytic hydrogen to replace coal
The above quotation is from Jevons' (he of paradox fame) marvellous 1865 treatise "The Coal Question":

oll.libertyfund.org/titles/317#Jev…

(h/t @physicspod)

and refers to an exchange in The Times of London in 1863, started by this letter on page 10 of the 2nd Sep 1863 edition:
G.A. Keyworth of Hastings followed up a few days on 16th Sep 1863 later with an elaboration of his ideas:
Read 11 tweets
31 Jul 20
Despite the current hype, there's nothing new about electrolytic hydrogen.

- 100 MW electrolysers since late 1920s for fertiliser and heavy water

- 100 GWh salt cavern storage since 1960s

- 4500 km hydrogen pipelines today

What was missing was abundant low cost power.
From 1920s-1970s, 100+ MW water electrolysers were built across world to meet demand for ammonia for fertiliser.

Prerequisite: cheap power from hydro dams.

All were dismantled as other power demand grew and fossil gas became available to make ammonia.

books.google.de/books?id=bf3lB…
Electrolysis was also the means of making heavy water (D2O), a neutron moderator, from its discovery in the 1930s until the GS process replaced it in the mid-1940s.

Heavy water was crucial for making the atomic bomb.

This made electrolysis of great military importance in WWII.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(