1. Coronary revascularization should be based on clinical indications, regardless of sex, race, or ethnicity.
2. In patients being considered for coronary revascularization for whom the optimal treatment strategy is unclear, a multidisciplinary Heart Team approach is recommended.
3. For significant LM disease, CABG is indicated to improve survival relative to that likely to be achieved with medical therapy. PCI is a reasonable compared with medical therapy, in low to medium complex CAD and LM disease that is equally suitable for CABG or PCI
4.Updated evidence with regard to mortality benefit of revascularization in SIHD, normal LV EF , and 3VD. CABG may be reasonable to improve survival. A survival benefit with PCI is uncertain. Revasc. decisions based on complexity, technical feasibility, and Heart Team discussion.
5.Use of radial artery as a surgical revascularization conduit is preferred versus a saphenous vein conduit to bypass the second most important target vessel after the LAD. Benefits include superior patency, reduced adverse cardiac events, and improved survival.
6.Radial artery access is recommended in ACS, SIHD patients undergoing PCI to reduce bleeding and vascular complications compared with a femoral approach. Patients with acute coronary syndrome also benefit from a reduction in mortality rate with this approach.
7.A short duration of DAPT after PCI in patients with SIHD is reasonable to reduce bleeding risk. After consideration of recurrent ischemia and bleeding risks, select patients may safely transition to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and stop aspirin after 1 to 3 months of DAPT
8.Staged PCI of a nonculprit artery in STEMI is recommended. Nonculprit PCI at the time of 1st PCI may be considered in stable pts w uncomplicated revasc. of the culprit, low complex nonculprit, and normal renal function. PCI of the nonculprit can be harmful in cardiogenic shock
9.Revascularization decisions in patients with DM and multivessel CAD are optimized by the use of a Heart Team approach. Patients with diabetes who have triple vessel disease should undergo surgical revascularization; PCI may be considered if they are poor candidates for surgery.
10.Treatment decisions for pts undergoing CABG should include the calculation of STS score surgical risk. SYNTAX score calculation in treatment decisions is less clear because of the interobserver variability in its calculation and its absence of clinical variables.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Non cardiac Surgery :
Important Do Not :
❌Routine interruption of antithrombotics in low bleeding risk
❌ECG for asymptomatic pt, low risk surgery
❌Routine echocardiography for LV evaluation.
❌Stress test for low risk surgery
❌Routine coronary angiography
See below for details :
Step 1/7 :
In patients scheduled for surgery with risk factors for or known CAD, determine the urgency of surgery. If an emergency, then determine the clinical risk factors that may influence perioperative management and proceed to surgery with appropriate monitoring and management strategies based on the clinical assessment.
Step 2/7:
If the surgery is urgent or elective, determine if the patient has an ACS/recent MI, acute HF, Sx VHD, significant arrhythmia. If yes, then refer patient for cardiology evaluation and management accordingly.
What's new in infective endocarditis (IE) guidelines . Some Highlights :
Prophylactic Antibiotics
Diagnostic criteria
Imaging
Surgery
Oral antibiotic Rx
- Prevention ( highly recommended : dental and cutaneous hygiene, no self prescription , wound disinfection, discouragement of tattooing , …).
- Clindamycin removed from drugs used in IE prophylaxis.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis to all at high risk.
- High risk groups: Prior IE, prosthetic valves, cyanotic CHD, VAD as destination tx.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis prior CIED, prosthetic valve.
- TEE even if TTE +ve.
-Vegetation size cut limit is 10 mm ( not 30 mm ).
- CT/MRI/PET part of IE criteria.
- Whole body imaging in symptomatic patients.
Trials for Non-Cardiologists Need to Know ( frequent consultations ):
TIME trial :
Taking Blood Pressure medication in the night or the daytime, It’s no better or worse when it comes to preventing heartattack, stroke & vascular death.
SODIUM-HF trial:
In ambulatory patients with heart failure, dietary intervention to reduce sodium intake does not reduce clinical.
MINOCA :
MINOCA terminology came when has been recongnozed that angiograpghy may identified no signficant ( < 50% ) diseases artery in pts with MI
It’s 5-10% of all MI
Incidence 50000-100000 / year US
Diagnostic criteria :
Which pts :
-Seen in all forms of ACS particularly among women and less likely to have treated hyperlipidemia although other risk factors are similar to MI-CAD
-One third of STEMI pts
-STEMI : women 4-10%, men 2-8%
-NSTEMI : women 9-15%, men 4-5%