Andy Constan Profile picture
Dec 10, 2021 24 tweets 4 min read Read on X
How the JHEQX roll works 101. I am writing this because I want to bookmark it so I can copy the link to those who think the roll has no market impact because "It's traded delta neutral" While this is 💯 true that the other side of the JHEQX collar is handed a delta neutral trade
That doesn't mean that @JPMorganAM doesn't have market impact in setting up the trade.
There are two possible states to consider regarding the old collar at expiration and one corner case state that I won't clutter this thread discussing
The old collar can have a delta of 100% (like it will if the SPX is here on the roll date of dec 31st or it can have a delta or 0% if the SPX is say 4350.
The counter parties for JPM delta hedge the collar for its life. However JHEQX fund sets the collar and forgets and never delta hedges it. It provides protection for the fund shareholders as specifically outlined in its prospectus.
So let set up the trade assuming current SPX

JHEQX has their normal actively managed portfolio of stocks and the expiring collar which will have a cash settlement to its providers of 4712 (today's spot-4450 the dec 31 strike)
After the roll JHEQX will have their same portfolio and the new collar
Before the roll dealers will have a deep ITM call and 100% short futures. After the rolls they will have a new collar and be short the new collar delta of 58% futures. That it.
The question that this begs is who bought the 42% futures to deliver to the hedge providers. Someone must have because we know what the initial state and final state of both counter parties is and there is a 42% buy missing
Let's look at what the hedge providers actually get. On the roll. The old call is bought by JHEQX and sold by the dealers. The new call is sold by JHEQX and bought by the dealers. The problem is that the dealers are still short futures too many futures
So JHEQX will also sell them a one day call that is deep in the money. In practice they actually can buy back less of the old call by doing this the dealers position is now short 100% futures. Long new call structure and long 42% of the original call which expires on the close
They are hedged. Technically there is a MOC buy in order to replace the 42% call that expires. That needs to be done with a cash basket and then that cash basket gets the EFP'd Exchanged for Physical to end up with futures that covers 42% but I am sure your eyes glazed over
Just focus on the MOC buy. If that MOC buy did not have an offset in that would create an 8BN buy and that would have a huge impact. That impact would be felt by JHEQX because they remain short the 42% old call which would rip in price
So how do they handle that. Well they sell 42% MOC and do the whole EFP to futures. No muss no fuss. No MOC Market impact. Somehow Jelly rolls can be involved on all this MOC/EFP stuff and I don't mean the dessert but I digress
But wait now JHEQX has the active portfolio the new collar (which is what they want) and are short 42% futures that they don't want
The Hedge providers are set and JPM is short.
What does JPM do about this short. The guys there Ham Reiner in particular the PM are seasoned derivatives specialist and portfolio managers. They know they want to do the roll as cheaply as possible from both setting the roll and managing this short delta they end up with.
To minimize the roll costs they provide a delta neutral structure. To minimize the flattening of their delta they start buying ahead of the trade and spread out the impact. This is a trivial exercise in general and is table stakes for any professional money manager. However,
The roll has become extremely visible and the shear size of both the options trades and the liquidity demand for them and the rehedging to get everyone flat what they want is highly followed by a bunch of the sharkiest players in the business
We know what Ham has to do but we also can't be sure of timing exactly. But I must say the shear size of the delta is extremely bad design in part because of the success of the fund. But every quarter either 42% of the funds AUM gets bought over a day or two or 58% gets sold
That means that just to follow their strategy the fund investors pay transaction costs of 200% fund turnover in a year that has nothing to do with beta or alpha but is just a sunk cost.
Really stupid design. But for all of us pure alpha. If call ITM big buy at end of month. Get ahead of it sell as it finishes in easy peasy. If Call OTM an even bigger sell over two days. Hint hint the call was OTM in September and @JPMorganAM essentially caused the low
So Ham manages his delta in the last few days of every month. If well above 4450 he's got to buy 8BN in the illiquid mid holiday end of year market.
The corner case is when the index is at one of the three collar strikes at expiration and damn. That is good times if it happens. Which it essentially did for a bit in September. December looks calm for now and a massive buy is your post Christmas present

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andy Constan

Andy Constan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dampedspring

Nov 9, 2025
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101 part 2.

Role of Repo.

In the prior thread I outline credit creation which can happen without banks and money creation which requires banks.

I also hinted at bank reserves role as being one of grease to the
system and NOT necessary for bank money creation but necessary for interbank deposit shifts. I also didn't discuss base money creation from the Fed and won't be dealing with that in this thread either.

Here I will discuss the specific role of Repo in today's financial system
The big takeaway is it is one of many important and necessary means of credit creation AND it has no role in money creation unless a bank is a party to the transaction.

That will take some weedy mechanics to prove. But before we do that let's talk about the entire economy
Read 25 tweets
Nov 9, 2025
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101

There has been a lot of focus on the repo market lately. I get it. It's an important part of the capital markets in the credit creation process. But its growth and contraction is part of the credit creation process
The repo market where transactions are between hedge funds and money market investors, and those who desire leverage for whatever purpose is an important market in the credit creation process BUT is not part of the money creation process UNLESS a commercial bank or the Fed is
A party to the transaction. Because this is largely misunderstood by even some plumbing experts it's worth it for me to write out my understanding (maybe im wrong which would be awesome so I can learn). So here I go.
Read 26 tweets
Nov 3, 2025
I've been studying various versions of balance sheet expansions over my career. I'd classify them as

Japanese first failed effort
UK's version
U.S. Version 1
U.S. version 2
ECB version
Japanese all in version 2

They are all fairly different in approach. The big takeaway 🧵
The developing Fed version that most are excited about is most akin to the Japanese first failed effort.

Here's a rough summary of each

In 2001-2006 Japan the BOJ initiated QE. In their version they offered significant lending to the Japanese banking system for good collateral
The balance sheet doubled in size at a pace of 35 Tn yen per year. However of that 35tn only 5 was direct asset purchase and most of that was Japanese Tbills. This is very similar to the BTFP program from SVB time and the current SRF. It was also sorta similar to ECB LTRO
Read 14 tweets
Nov 1, 2025
Why do repo rates change and what do they have to do with reserves. This is a super technical issue and there are better folks to follow on this topic than me but I'll give it a go.

Firstly what are the two sides of a repo transaction and why do they want to interact.
One side is a guy with a bank deposit he wants to earn interest on. The other is a guy who wants to borrow money overnight and has assets he owns that he is willing to provide as collateral to the loan. We can go down a level on each side but for now let's keep it simple.
Most repo transactions are done with UST as the collateral and most UST collatarel used is TBills but. UST's are also highly common collateral but do to the marked to market risk they offer less borrowing capacity per unit of notional (higher haircut)
Read 22 tweets
Oct 21, 2025
Some thoughts on 10 year notes since Powell guided for a restart of the cutting cycle at Jackson Hole. Trying to answer what the bond market is saying

Nominal yields have fallen 33bp Image
Note yields are driven lower by
1)Falling real GDP expectations
2)Falling Inflation expectations
3) Falling "risk" of owning assets
4) Improving supply/demand balance vs expectations.

In attributing nominal yield changes to these 4 things unfortunately market prices don't
Easily demonstrate these things. For instance 3&4 are only able to be measured via a model which estimates risk premiums or the expected return over holding cash

Even Breakeven inflation and real TIPS yields have risk premium buried in there market yields. However we can try
Read 15 tweets
Oct 18, 2025
I YR return Asset bull cases part 1

SPX

SPX has a trailing earnings yield of 4% with expected 1 year earnings growth of 11.7%. What's the bull case? For me the bull case is a combination of simply collecting the earnings accrual
and having the multiple expand slightly. In that case a 16% return would occur which is roughly 1 std higher and happens 1 out of 6 timer.

The big driver of equity returns is the accrual of earnings. Over the last 5 years earnings accrual has dominated historic returns
As long as companies continue to grow earnings they will go up over the long term.

Multiples rise and fall and as can be seen in the chart can dominate performance of equities in the short term. Furthermore multiples are impacted by interest rates
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(