Andy Constan Profile picture
Dec 10, 2021 24 tweets 4 min read Read on X
How the JHEQX roll works 101. I am writing this because I want to bookmark it so I can copy the link to those who think the roll has no market impact because "It's traded delta neutral" While this is 💯 true that the other side of the JHEQX collar is handed a delta neutral trade
That doesn't mean that @JPMorganAM doesn't have market impact in setting up the trade.
There are two possible states to consider regarding the old collar at expiration and one corner case state that I won't clutter this thread discussing
The old collar can have a delta of 100% (like it will if the SPX is here on the roll date of dec 31st or it can have a delta or 0% if the SPX is say 4350.
The counter parties for JPM delta hedge the collar for its life. However JHEQX fund sets the collar and forgets and never delta hedges it. It provides protection for the fund shareholders as specifically outlined in its prospectus.
So let set up the trade assuming current SPX

JHEQX has their normal actively managed portfolio of stocks and the expiring collar which will have a cash settlement to its providers of 4712 (today's spot-4450 the dec 31 strike)
After the roll JHEQX will have their same portfolio and the new collar
Before the roll dealers will have a deep ITM call and 100% short futures. After the rolls they will have a new collar and be short the new collar delta of 58% futures. That it.
The question that this begs is who bought the 42% futures to deliver to the hedge providers. Someone must have because we know what the initial state and final state of both counter parties is and there is a 42% buy missing
Let's look at what the hedge providers actually get. On the roll. The old call is bought by JHEQX and sold by the dealers. The new call is sold by JHEQX and bought by the dealers. The problem is that the dealers are still short futures too many futures
So JHEQX will also sell them a one day call that is deep in the money. In practice they actually can buy back less of the old call by doing this the dealers position is now short 100% futures. Long new call structure and long 42% of the original call which expires on the close
They are hedged. Technically there is a MOC buy in order to replace the 42% call that expires. That needs to be done with a cash basket and then that cash basket gets the EFP'd Exchanged for Physical to end up with futures that covers 42% but I am sure your eyes glazed over
Just focus on the MOC buy. If that MOC buy did not have an offset in that would create an 8BN buy and that would have a huge impact. That impact would be felt by JHEQX because they remain short the 42% old call which would rip in price
So how do they handle that. Well they sell 42% MOC and do the whole EFP to futures. No muss no fuss. No MOC Market impact. Somehow Jelly rolls can be involved on all this MOC/EFP stuff and I don't mean the dessert but I digress
But wait now JHEQX has the active portfolio the new collar (which is what they want) and are short 42% futures that they don't want
The Hedge providers are set and JPM is short.
What does JPM do about this short. The guys there Ham Reiner in particular the PM are seasoned derivatives specialist and portfolio managers. They know they want to do the roll as cheaply as possible from both setting the roll and managing this short delta they end up with.
To minimize the roll costs they provide a delta neutral structure. To minimize the flattening of their delta they start buying ahead of the trade and spread out the impact. This is a trivial exercise in general and is table stakes for any professional money manager. However,
The roll has become extremely visible and the shear size of both the options trades and the liquidity demand for them and the rehedging to get everyone flat what they want is highly followed by a bunch of the sharkiest players in the business
We know what Ham has to do but we also can't be sure of timing exactly. But I must say the shear size of the delta is extremely bad design in part because of the success of the fund. But every quarter either 42% of the funds AUM gets bought over a day or two or 58% gets sold
That means that just to follow their strategy the fund investors pay transaction costs of 200% fund turnover in a year that has nothing to do with beta or alpha but is just a sunk cost.
Really stupid design. But for all of us pure alpha. If call ITM big buy at end of month. Get ahead of it sell as it finishes in easy peasy. If Call OTM an even bigger sell over two days. Hint hint the call was OTM in September and @JPMorganAM essentially caused the low
So Ham manages his delta in the last few days of every month. If well above 4450 he's got to buy 8BN in the illiquid mid holiday end of year market.
The corner case is when the index is at one of the three collar strikes at expiration and damn. That is good times if it happens. Which it essentially did for a bit in September. December looks calm for now and a massive buy is your post Christmas present

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andy Constan

Andy Constan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dampedspring

Jul 12
Taking a step back 101 part 2. Policymaker tweaks - gasoline and fire extinguishers are both at play like during a crisis.

In part 1 of this thread I made a case that an excellent outcome would be a stabilization of NGDP at 4%.
4% achieved via inflation at target of 2%. Population growth at roughly 50bp and production growth at a robust but not historic high of 1.5% would be Goldilocks.

You may quibble at productictity being too low because of AI and deregulation but because of both of those being
Deflationary any bigger number for productivity may make holding inflation at 2% harder without monetary stimulus which means NGDP may stay at 4% anyway.

4% stability with a credible inflation target would almost certainly generate a lower marginal interest costs for the
Read 25 tweets
Jul 12
Taking a big step back 101 Looking at the most major single economic variable is helpful sometimes. Current YoY GDP growth is at the post Covid low of 4.7% which is still relatively hot vs history but the flight path has been clearly in descent. Policymakers would ALL like 🧵 1/2Image
To have this single variable bottom at no less than 4%, a literal "soft landing" and avoid dropping into the 3's or 2's or worse and stabilize at 4% for the next decade. Regardless of political affiliation we all should hope for this outcome.

Why should we hope for this?
Before delving into the reasons why 4% NGDP stability is "good". Let's start with some mechanics of the national debt which benefit from a stable 4% NGDP

Current US interest rate on debt held by the public is 3% ish. marginal rate is below 4%
Read 25 tweets
Jul 7
Why do investment mandates exist and what dynamics exist because of them 101.

Benchmarks are a formal version of an investment mandate but I am talking about the broad topic of investment mandates.

I don't think it's controversial but I may be wrong but I think
an investment mandate serves a high purpose. An investment mandate allows an end investor to have a reasonable expectation of the risk and reward of the portfolio and its likely correlation to narrow and broader factors.

As many end investors allocate to many investments
They depend on a PM staying within their mandate. For instance an end investor may have an equity fund allocation and a BTC allocation. They clearly like BTC and have allocated separately at their desired size confident that the equity PM would NOT allocate to BTC because
Read 14 tweets
Jun 25
AUM and returns for multi strategy funds 101. Because people struggle with my summing up of my alpha and beta returns instead of "using a weighted average" I thought it may be useful to help people understand how professional money management works.
My experience is from decades of personal first hand knowledge. At my own hedge fund, Bridgewater, Brevan Howard, and first hand knowledge from PM's and owners of multi strategy pod shops. At the end of the day what matters is the return on AUM. What real dollars are earned
on the capital invested. Thats where this 101 will end. But first I'll start with basic concept of return that are often confused by many, including people on this app, who have not sat in an end investor or hedge fund owner seat. What is the denominator for return calculations.
Read 26 tweets
Jun 12
Manage your future money or your spot money 101 You can't do both and sometimes (Japan) you can't do either. Bonds or Money Choose your fighter.

Since the Fed began tightening all G4 currencies have depreciated va hard money and a consumption basket. But future money (bonds) Image
Image
Are Trading in a range. Future money is being protected via issuance policy and CB reinvestment policies and QT taper. Yield curves ex Japan are pretty average steepness. Despite spot money losing purchasing power and store of value Image
Image
Image
In Japan decades of YCC even modestly being unwound is showing that sometimes you can't protect spot money or future money at all. For now the policymakers are protecting future money and the market is all in short spot money via
Read 6 tweets
Jun 9
Swap to floating 101.

How do issuers attempt to understand their financing costs relative to various alternatives and relative to competitors costs? How do investors determine the expected return of their investment choices? How do futures and options traders
Determine the appropriate risk free rate to determine the forward price of the underlying asset they are trading? Lastly how do global issuers, investors, and derivatives participants determine these things in their local currency.

The answer is they all swap to floating
What does that mean. We all know what a floating interest rate is. It's essentially the return on overnight cash (really 3 month sofr in the U.S.)
By swapping all investments back to overnight cash one can then compare the return in excess of cash
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(