Even Dan Quayle, who has the IQ of a bowl of cherries, has acknowledged that there was literally no way for Mike Pence to somehow magically overturn the election results. So why is the media still pretending that Trump’s dumbass treason plot had any chance of ever working?
Why do I keep harping in this? Because it’s important.
First, the truth matters.
But also: the average American will look at the facts and accept that Trump and his people really were carrying out a treason plot. But they will NOT accept any claims that it “almost worked.”
Average Americans are going to see the laughably moronic nature of this treason plot, the inept way in which it was carried out by complete idiots, and the fact that no one can explain how it could possibly have resulted in Trump magically getting a second term.
And they’re going to say “Trump and his dumbasses were obviously going to fail but it’s still a treason plot so lock them up and to hell with Trump’s political party.”
But if we try to convince them the idiotic plot “almost worked,” which they can see is false, we lose them.
And once average Americans decide we’re being absurdly hyperbolic by claiming that this laughable plot almost worked, we’re going to lose them on all of it. They’ll revert back to their default position of believing both sides are full of it, and they’ll decide not to care.
And if we lose the folks in the middle like this, then we’ll have a very difficult time winning the midterms.
Most liberal activists love to bathe themselves in doomsday hysteria about how we’re all doomed. But average Americans see that for the hyperbole it is, and tune it out.
So if you’re sitting around insisting that a laughable PowerPoint slide show and some costumed Capitol attackers almost magically gave Trump a second term, you’re just blowing smoke up your own asses, for the adrenaline rush. You’re NOT trying to win anything.
Moreover, if you keep (incorrectly) telling the hapless idiot traitors on the other side that they “almost succeeded” in overthrowing the government, you’re just telling them to try it again. Stop emboldening them by cowering to them.
Many of you reading this are saying “wait, these concepts are entirely foreign to me.”
Yeah, because the media & pundits have conditioned you to believe that constantly yelling “the other side is going to win no matter what” is activism. When in fact it’s precisely how you lose.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What Gavin Newsom is doing is cool, but it's not somehow magically going to put a dent in the Texas abortion law. Unfortunately the defeatists are already using Newsom's move as an excuse to inaccurately bash the Democrats in Congress for not waving magic wands of their own.
This is similar to when Texas Democrats left the state over the voter suppression law. The defeatists all pointed to it as "finally, Democrats with a spine!" But predictably, the move didn't change a thing, because stunts like that – while invigorating – never do change anything.
The Democrats always have to decide how much of their time to spend on the strategic grunt work that actually changes things, and how much time to waste on symbolic stunts that accomplish nothing but appease the dummies within the Democratic base who think stunts are action.
The more clear it becomes that the January 6th Committee is winning, the more loudly the doomsday pundits will insist it's losing. They staked themselves to the scary prediction that the committee would fail, so now they have to try to drown out its increasingly obvious success.
Once the 1/6 committee's success becomes so clear that the doomsday pundits can't even try to shout it down, they'll either 1) falsely take credit for having forced the committee to be more "aggressive" or 2) ignore the committee and move on to some other doomsday narrative.
We're facing real challenges now, which require rolling up our sleeves and putting in hard work in order to win. But the pundits can't get rating and retweets by focusing on that. So instead they stick to "clever" tweets about how inept the Democratic leadership supposedly is.
The Trump regime’s plot to overthrow the election consisted of pressuring Mike Pence to wave a magic wand that didn’t exist. You don’t have to give Pence any credit for refusing to go along with it, because there was nothing for Pence to go along with.
The most Pence could have done was verbally object to the certification, which the Senate would have certified anyway. And if Trump didn’t like it, the courts would have immediately laughed in his face. There was literally nothing Pence could have done to keep Trump in office.
And Pence knew all of this, which is why he didn’t bother futilely making a fool of himself. He knew it was a desperate and defeated Trump asking him to wave a magic wand that simply did not exist outside of Trump’s hallucinatory mind.
Thank you Ari Melber for acknowledging on MSNBC just now that Mitch McConnell is not some omnipotent figure who always wins, and that in reality he often blinks or loses battles. Palmer Report has been hammering home this fact all year.
McConnell often wins, and he often loses. He’s very savvy but he doesn’t have a magic wand. Yet for years the media (on the left and right) has falsely portrayed McConnell as always getting his way on everything, by simply not covering the numerous times he’s lost or caved.
Why would the media misrepresent this? The usual answer: ratings.
Right wingers like to be told they’re winning, so right wing media always insists McConnell is winning.
Liberals respond to being told they’re losing, so liberal media also always insists McConnell is winning.
Wealthy and powerful people like Trump generally get away with crimes by finding a way to not get indicted to begin with, and they have various ways to pull that off. But once they do get indicted, they tend to go down. Even fancy lawyers usually won't get you off at trial.
Trump is under criminal investigation in three jurisdictions, two of which have reached the grand jury stage.
If Trump gets indicted for financial crimes (Manhattan or Westchester), or gets indicted for election tampering (Georgia), there is every reason to expect he'll go down.
The wealthy and powerful person's main tool for not getting indicted is to keep crimes a secret. Paying others do to the crimes, paying to cover it up, so prosecutors don't even know to look for anything.
For Trump, that ship has already sailed. Prosecutors are clearly onto him.
The doomsday types are already insisting Jason Miller won't go through with cooperating. That misses the point. The committee has set precedent that you have to turn over valuable evidence just to buy yourself time. And if Miller backs out, he goes to prison for contempt anyway.
So if the committee is sticking to its own precedent, Miller must have already turned over valuable evidence just to get his contempt deadline pushed back slightly. That would be a win for the committee whether Miller ends up fully cooperating or not.
Just as the committee's dealings with Mark Meadows were win for the committee, because Meadows turned over the texts and powerpoint stuff before backing out. And now Meadows will go to prison for contempt anyway. As will Miller if he backs out.