The Daily Beast has published a claim from another conservative author that I "stole" Johnny the Walrus from her. I'll address this once. It's not even close to true and it's sad that she's decided to run to a left wing rag to hit a fellow conservative.
My wife suggested to me that I write a children's book about a year ago. We came up with the Johnny the Walrus concept together months before this other book came out. I have plenty of documentation that can prove that. I signed a contract with DW last spring
The book took a while to come out because DW hadn't launched its publishing imprint yet. In the meantime, her book was released. I wasn't upset. I'm glad there are other conservative books on the market addressing this topic. Is there only supposed to be one? Really?
The left has dozens of children's books pushing gender ideology and I don't think those authors are getting jealous and accusing each other of plagiarism. That this happens on the right only shows again why we tend to lose. Not much in the way of teamwork.
The books are very different anyway. Her book, which had not been announced when I wrote mine, is a beautifully illustrated parable. Mine is a deadly serious joke. We approach the issue more directly. She takes a gentler tone. I don't think either approach is wrong.
So to review: 1) The claim is demonstrably false. 2) If you have an issue with me, please come to me directly instead of the left wing press. 3) The books are not the same. 4) There can and should be more than one anti-gender ideology children's book in existence.
In conclusion, you can buy my beloved and bestselling LGBT children's book Johnny the Walrus here: JohnnyTheWalrus.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I finally watched some of the Chappelle special and it really isn’t very good. He makes a few decent points about gender and PC culture but the whole thing feels overly defensive and almost like an apology. Also there aren’t many jokes. And THIS is what everyone is mad about?
I got the sense that he really wants the LGBT left to accept him and like him so he’s trying to explain himself. It’s definitely not the kind of bold and in your face routine that it’s made out to be.
I find it hard to believe that anyone actually found it to be uproariously funny. He wasn’t even trying to be funny through much of it. And even if I agree with some of the points, I still think comedians need to be funny. That’s like their whole job.
[Thread] Ok. I’ve listened to your feedback. I understand that many of you are upset about what I said. Many of you have told me that my opinion was personally offensive to you. Moreover, my perspective didn’t match with your own lived experience.
Over the course of the last couple of days, I’ve had a chance to reflect. I never intended for my words to cause division, much less hurt and pain. This has been a wake up call. And it’s made me realize something:
I realized that I’m extremely right. More right than I ever imagined. My critics are wrong. They’re also disingenuous, insufferable, and stupid, and their feelings are irrelevant. I’m not sorry at all and never will be.
The thing about paternity leave is there isn't much for dad to do when the baby is a newborn, especially if mom is breastfeeding. His main role is to take care of mom as she recovers but of course that doesn't apply to Buttigieg so I'm not sure why he needs paternity leave at all
People are saying dad needs paternity leave for "bonding time." Sure, a week or something is fine. But the baby isn't going to bond with dad much until he's a little older. And we shouldn't be paying cabinet secretaries to stay home for two months for "bonding time" anyway.
You can also still bond with your child while working. I'm very well bonded with all four of my kids and I had no paternity leave for any of them.
I understand that conservatives don’t like Facebook but understand that the corporate media is attacking them because the corporate media wants to be the sole gatekeepers deciding what you’re told and who tells it. If you’re locking arms with them, it is to your detriment.
A world without social media is a world where the corporate media once again controls almost all of the information and determines which perspectives are heard. That’s what they’re pining for. It’s the only thing they care about.
I’m a critic of Big Tech, but my criticism is from an entirely opposite angle. I want the companies to stop censoring conservative content. But most of the major pressure right now is coming from people who are mad they don’t censor it more.
The whole "intersex" talking point from LGBT activists is disingenuous bullshit. First of all, they use it to validate transgenderism when the two have nothing to do with one another. Second, intersex people have a medical condition. It doesn't call the sex binary into question.
They latch onto this extremely rare birth defect and use it to ram through all of these broad, far reaching claims about sex and identity, smuggling in all kinds of identities that have absolutely nothing to do with intersex at all. And people fall for it. Amazing.
Some people are born with one arm. That doesn't mean it's incorrect to say "humans have two arms." If a human is born with one, we automatically know that something went wrong. He wasn't supposed to be this way. It's an exception that proves the rule.