Seth Abramson Profile picture
Dec 13, 2021 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
(THREAD) This thread includes my thoughts on the lengthy report just issued by the House January 6 Committee—which seeks a congressional referral to DOJ for Contempt of Congress against former GOP congressman and Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows. I hope you'll read on and share. Image
KEY REPORT POINT #1: Mark Meadows was on the January 2 conference call in which the January 6 plot was hatched—along with Trump, hundreds of state GOP legislators, the leadership of the domestic-terrorist "Stop the Steal" movement, and several other key Trump allies and advisers.
KEY REPORT POINT #2: As discussed at length by PROOF and other media outlets, the White House did indeed use Trumpist stooge and Pentagon plant Kash Patel in the run-up to January 6 and *on* January 6; Meadows was reportedly in "nonstop" contact with Patel as the attack unfolded.
KEY REPORT POINT #3: It's increasingly clear that Trump, Meadows, and Patel only intended to release the Guard to the Capitol *if* doing so advanced the interests of pro-Trump forces. Meadows apparently admitted this was the planned use of the Guard—and the only contemplated use.
KEY REPORT POINT #4: Mark Meadows appears to have been a—or even *the*—key figure in plotting the overthrow of DOJ leadership in the runup to January 6, with the *specific* goal of furthering the plot PROOF has written about for months: getting "alternate [Trump] electors" to DC.
FOLLOWUP to KEY REPORT POINT #4: To say Meadows was instrumental to the plot to send Trump "electors" to DC from battleground states Biden won is to say that Meadows—like Trump—knew by January 2 that the January 6 joint session had to be delayed *by any means* for that to happen.
KEY REPORT POINT #5: The Committee euphemistically notes Meadows may have violated federal recordkeeping laws in not preserving certain documents. In the hands of DOJ, such evidence could eventually evolve into criminal charges for Obstruction of Justice or Hindering Prosecution.
KEY REPORT POINT #6: We already knew this, but the Report further confirms that Meadows was in the Oval Office on December 18, 2020 during one of the most bizarre and inappropriate meetings in US political history—between Trump, Powell, Flynn, Byrne, Giuliani, and several others.
KEY REPORT POINT #7: Meadows was one of many high-level recipients—and *distributors and advocates*—for the several "coup memos" produced by Team Trump in the days leading up to the attack on the Capitol, all of which were widely—but secretly—distributed amongst GOP politicians.
KEY REPORT POINT #8: The Committee is oddly more credulous to the Kremers than it should be—accepting their team's representation that they told the White House they were worried Stop the Steal leaders Ali Alexander, Roger Stone and Alex Jones were creating a dangerous situation.
FOLLOWUP to KEY REPORT POINT #8: We must remember that the Secret Service had done a security assessment for Capitol Hill and given it to Team Trump days before January 6—and it assessed that the day would be dangerous. So the White House knew either way. sethabramson.substack.com/p/a-january-6-…
KEY REPORT POINT #9: Trump continues to refuse to publicly and formally raise executive privilege, even though he legally must do so to try to gain its benefits. It is clear that he is instead witness tampering—often via lawyers—in the background. This has been his *lifelong* MO.
KEY REPORT POINT #10: Mark Meadows is currently making a claim of absolute testimonial immunity that's not only legally meritless but would have Republicans screaming for life imprisonment if it came from a former Democratic chief of staff in response to a congressional subpoena.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Feb 1
Imagine being a 42 year-old pleading with a known pedophilic sex criminal to fly you to his island so you can party with girls he assures you will be 25 or younger.

Then imagine lying about it to hundreds of millions. Even after your lies are caught.

You don't hate Elon enough.
Instead of saying—as honor demands—"I made horrible mistakes for which there's no excuse, I'll take time away from public life to reflect on them," he's kept lying, attacked media, tried to distract, and obscenely said he worked harder than Epstein's victims to get the Files out.
Now imagine that this happens during the same 12-month period this man gleefully—without having any idea what he was doing, or even *caring* if he had any idea—cut a massive foreign aid program whose erasure is projected to cause *more than 10 million deaths* in the years ahead.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 30
This major report on the Greg Bovino-to-Tom Homan handover in Minneapolis at once reveals that the Trump regime hasn’t changed its plans for ICE *and* serves as a primer on the many aspects of the criminal justice system Homan lied about today.

🔗:

RT! sethabramson.substack.com/p/trump-border…Image
It can't be sufficiently emphasized that the Trump regime has at all points lied about every aspect of its immigration agenda, every aspect of how immigration enforcement works and every aspect of the justice system that touches upon immigration enforcement.

It's all a long con.
No one is saying that every American must understand the justice system.

That would be ideal, but it's impractical.

The problem is that our justice system lies at the center of our politics—which means ignorance about how it works is ripe for abuse by an authoritarian regime.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 17
I shouldn't even have to say this, but precisely *no one* in the independent journalism sphere is saying that Trump can *legally* cancel the midterms.

So corporate media should put on its thinking cap and ask themselves what independent journalists *are* saying.

Yes.... *that*.
It's Month 1 of a 10-month plan and they're already illegally invading countries, illegally occupying U.S. cities, posting Nazi memes from government accounts almost daily, and publicly saying there should be no elections anymore. You think their plan is to do *anything* legally?
So I've no idea why corporate media keeps sanctimoniously reminding us of something we already know—that Trump can't *legally* cancel elections. Because that's not where the debate or mystery is now. The question is whether he thinks he can wait until 2028 to declare martial law.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 15
The question media should be asking: if Minneapolis only needs 600 police officers to perform all general law enforcement activities in the city, why did Trump send 3,000 federal agents to execute a statutorily and constitutionally *much* smaller task?

Answer? He wanted a *war*.
Based on the size of the task and authority ICE actually has—merely executing judicial warrants for already-identified undocumented persons—we'd expect an ICE "surge" in Minneapolis to be about 100 agents.

Trump sent *30 times that*.

Because he wants to declare an insurrection.
So if you're an American paying only small attention to Minneapolis and wondering why things are crazy there, imagine *your* town being the target of an *unprecedented* federal op.

Big deal, right?

Now imagine the feds sending *30 times* too many men—most *virtually untrained*.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 6
(🧵) THREAD: There’s no purpose in debating Trump supporters on Venezuela. They lack the background to participate in a coherent conversation. Do they know Trump is backing a socialist despot over a capitalist who won the 2024 election by 34 points? No.

It gets worse from there.
1/ People without principles, like MAGAs, desperately alight on random anecdotes to try to “prove” points—as they don’t know how to *actually* prove a point, make an argument, hold a consistent position, marshal evidence, or maintain logical throughlines across diverse scenarios.
2/ So for instance, they’ll tell you that the justness of what Trump did is “proven” by how some Venezuelans reacted to it. But these are the same folks whose political ideology has long been grounded in denying international law and the sovereignty or interests of other nations.
Read 19 tweets
Jan 4
This is the tip of the iceberg.

As detailed in 2020 bestseller Proof of Corruption, Trump used Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani and a megadonor to launch clandestine negotiations in Venezuela that would've effectuated some version of the deal. America is being lied to every which way. Image
What the NYT-bestselling Proof Series has shown—across 2,500 pages and over 15,000 reliable major media citations from around the world—is that what we think of as many different scandals is *one* scandal: the Trump-Russia Scandal. Ukraine, Israel, KSA, Venezuela... even Epstein.
The Trump-Russia Scandal, as a research topic, is so vast—it covers so many continents, decades, and scandals in various nations—that we can analogize being a scholar of it to being a scholar of the Cold War or the Gilded Age.

We keep speaking of trees without seeing the forest.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(