Seth Abramson Profile picture
Dec 13, 2021 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
(THREAD) This thread includes my thoughts on the lengthy report just issued by the House January 6 Committee—which seeks a congressional referral to DOJ for Contempt of Congress against former GOP congressman and Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows. I hope you'll read on and share. Image
KEY REPORT POINT #1: Mark Meadows was on the January 2 conference call in which the January 6 plot was hatched—along with Trump, hundreds of state GOP legislators, the leadership of the domestic-terrorist "Stop the Steal" movement, and several other key Trump allies and advisers.
KEY REPORT POINT #2: As discussed at length by PROOF and other media outlets, the White House did indeed use Trumpist stooge and Pentagon plant Kash Patel in the run-up to January 6 and *on* January 6; Meadows was reportedly in "nonstop" contact with Patel as the attack unfolded.
KEY REPORT POINT #3: It's increasingly clear that Trump, Meadows, and Patel only intended to release the Guard to the Capitol *if* doing so advanced the interests of pro-Trump forces. Meadows apparently admitted this was the planned use of the Guard—and the only contemplated use.
KEY REPORT POINT #4: Mark Meadows appears to have been a—or even *the*—key figure in plotting the overthrow of DOJ leadership in the runup to January 6, with the *specific* goal of furthering the plot PROOF has written about for months: getting "alternate [Trump] electors" to DC.
FOLLOWUP to KEY REPORT POINT #4: To say Meadows was instrumental to the plot to send Trump "electors" to DC from battleground states Biden won is to say that Meadows—like Trump—knew by January 2 that the January 6 joint session had to be delayed *by any means* for that to happen.
KEY REPORT POINT #5: The Committee euphemistically notes Meadows may have violated federal recordkeeping laws in not preserving certain documents. In the hands of DOJ, such evidence could eventually evolve into criminal charges for Obstruction of Justice or Hindering Prosecution.
KEY REPORT POINT #6: We already knew this, but the Report further confirms that Meadows was in the Oval Office on December 18, 2020 during one of the most bizarre and inappropriate meetings in US political history—between Trump, Powell, Flynn, Byrne, Giuliani, and several others.
KEY REPORT POINT #7: Meadows was one of many high-level recipients—and *distributors and advocates*—for the several "coup memos" produced by Team Trump in the days leading up to the attack on the Capitol, all of which were widely—but secretly—distributed amongst GOP politicians.
KEY REPORT POINT #8: The Committee is oddly more credulous to the Kremers than it should be—accepting their team's representation that they told the White House they were worried Stop the Steal leaders Ali Alexander, Roger Stone and Alex Jones were creating a dangerous situation.
FOLLOWUP to KEY REPORT POINT #8: We must remember that the Secret Service had done a security assessment for Capitol Hill and given it to Team Trump days before January 6—and it assessed that the day would be dangerous. So the White House knew either way. sethabramson.substack.com/p/a-january-6-…
KEY REPORT POINT #9: Trump continues to refuse to publicly and formally raise executive privilege, even though he legally must do so to try to gain its benefits. It is clear that he is instead witness tampering—often via lawyers—in the background. This has been his *lifelong* MO.
KEY REPORT POINT #10: Mark Meadows is currently making a claim of absolute testimonial immunity that's not only legally meritless but would have Republicans screaming for life imprisonment if it came from a former Democratic chief of staff in response to a congressional subpoena.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Jul 19
CORRECTIONS:

(1) Trump and Epstein became friends in 1987, not 1990. The New York Times inexplicably cuts 3 years off their 17-plus-year friendship.

(2) Their friendship did *not* end because Epstein was a creep. It ended over a Florida real estate deal. nytimes.com/2025/07/19/us/…
To the credit of the NYT, it does eventually clarify Point #2 in the report.

I do wish it spent more time on the fact that an anonymous person dimed out Epstein after Trump got angry at Epstein over the real estate deal in 2004—and that Trump has a history of diming people out.
That question alone could change everything.

If in fact Trump extended his long history of being a disgusting snitch only when it personally benefits him by reporting Epstein to the police in 2004—or having an agent do it—it would confirm he knew exactly what Epstein was up to.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 17
Everyone in America needs to read this FREE—I’ve gifted it below—report from the conservative WALL STREET JOURNAL about Trump and Epstein.

Apparently the president has now threatened to sue the WSJ over this 100% accurate report due to how damaging it is.
wsj.com/politics/trump…
Holy actual literal shit OMG Image
By the way, the answer to the riddle in the note (in effect, “What do you get for men [Trump and Epstein] who have everything?”) is “You get them something one isn’t *allowed* to have.”

Trump then writes that he and Epstein have the thing they want in common—and it “never ages.”
Read 12 tweets
Jul 16
Can I make the blindingly obvious observation that now that we know Trump and his crew doctored the Epstein video we can't possibly trust that anything else they release will be all they actually have?

Wouldn't you just assume documents are being *burned and shredded* right now?
Like aren't we actually past the point of no return here? The second we learned that they cut out 3 minutes from the Epstein video and tried to pass it off as a legitimate piece of evidence, wasn't that pretty much the end of any Epstein credibility for the whole administration?
You don't have to be a former federal investigator to know that every moment between the release of that fake video and the inevitable future decision by Trump to release "everything" was a moment that Trump goons at DOJ/FBI spent destroying evidence that didn't center Democrats
Read 7 tweets
Jul 9
What would Trump do if this song went viral today?
WARNING: This song goes hard and makes no apologies.
LYRICS:

Gather round and I'll tell you of two Florida men
Who for twenty or so years were the best of friends
One of them ended up mysteriously dead
While the other one sleeps in a White House bed
Read 17 tweets
Jul 6
I have no difficulty saying that Trump and Musk caused some of the 50+ flood deaths in Texas.

And here's why: these two men with no expertise in disaster preparedness were told not to cut the positions they cut, and were told people would die if they did.

And then people died. Image
Moreover, Democrats are never going to start winning elections again until they're willing to call a thing just what it is.

Texas Democrats should be clear and persistent in saying that public service cuts overseen by non-experts desperate for billionaire tax cuts killed people.
And if Republicans respond by saying that Democrats are politicizing these deaths, the Democrats should respond: THAT'S BECAUSE THE DEATHS ARE POLITICAL. POLITICIANS CAUSED THEM.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 2
(📢) NEW at PROOF: A Feud of the Century update from a bestselling biographer of both the Richest Man on Earth and the Most Powerful Man on Earth.

“Trump Is Coming for Musk. Here Are 20 Reasons Musk Has the Upper Hand, Even If He Doesn’t Realize It” (🔗): sethabramson.substack.com/p/trump-is-sti…Image
1/ If I had to rank by how annoying they are the false narratives I hear folks who don't study these men professionally advancing, the claim that the Feud is fake would easily rank #1.

There's *no evidence whatsoever* substantiating the claim that any part of the Feud is fake.
2/ #2 would be the claim that Trump isn't the most powerful man alive. I've spent more time and words arguing that Trump is beholden to foreign business associates than anyone anywhere—and even I understand that when you control Earth’s most powerful military, it means something.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(