So I promised a digest of @NafeezAhmed piece in @BylineTimes regarding American far-right influence & interference at Cambridge. The piece is detailed & can't really be summarised. But it seems to boil down to this. (1/x)
This is not just a group of academics with similar views and political interests coming together. A powerful, wealthy foreign entity not connected to academia or research, mired in political power-brokering & lobbying is seeking to shape what is happening on a university campus.
To do so, it has brought together academics (apparently all male) disaffected with what they see as 'woke' influence on students & campus culture into a 'network' which extends to other universities (certainly Oxford). Among the group's activities are sponsoring race scientiests,
as well as controversialists known for endorsing such race science (positing that black people are less intelligent, for instance) and attacking gender equality and transgender rights. The network also seems to include people making the 'case for colonialism'.
What is the end goal? After all, if it was just a bunch of academics interested in misogyny & racism, they could meet & have coffee twice a term & compare calipers. Why is a very powerful megabillionaire involved? What forms has this influence taken that we don't know about yet?
The piece makes disturbing connections not just between a group of academics & attempts to rehabilitate race science, sex inequality etc, but also between these discredited subjects, current government advisors/policy, & rightwing thinktanks with influence in the education sector
The piece further connects activities at Cambridge & Oxford with governmental advisors not just in Britain but white nationalism in the United States as well as the Trump administration. It also connects so-called 'free speech' legislation with these forces. What is going on?
Is the right-hand man of a very powerful & wealthy rightwing American connected to Donald Trump in contact with a group of academics, telling them who to invite to campus & apparently getting students groomed through internships? The article claims this. We need to know.
What implications does this activity--& potential access to huge funds--have for those teaching & researching at Cambridge? What implications does it have for administrative decisions? We already know 'free speech' amendments were rammed through with likely outside influence.
Currently more questions than answers. A bunch of terms that sit next to each other, raising them. White nationalism. American evangelists. Thatcherites. 'Free Speech' Trojan Horses. Dark money. Woke-bashers. Race Science. Transphobia. Misogyny. Colonialism. Western supremacy.
These questions must be openly & publicly posed and answered. What will not do is pretending they don't exist, & they can just be ignored.
"Thiel’s chief of staff was – according to Byline Times’ sources – involved in seeding the UK coalition of anti-liberal academics centred around Cambridge University."
Why? To what end? Who is involved? What are the implications? What's in it & for whom? We have right to know.
One important question is --where else has Thiel's money gone? What influence has it been able to purchase? What governance reforms has it been behind?
We now more or less know that the 'free speech amendments' pushed through a year ago were initiated with outside influence, from FSU. That is an example of dodgy & illegitimate influence on university autonomy. But it is probably the least of it. We need to know.
The interest in 'flipping' Cambridge to a megalomaniac megabillionaire is clear. Oxford staffs the Cabinet right now. Cambridge could easily be in the same position, has been so historically. A fast-track to political control --the only problem being'woke' students & teachers.
Some of us have been targeted by members of this group, naming no names for the present, in the press & well as with our employers. What seemed like a vendetta by an aggrieved racist now takes on more sinister contours--& I'm reasonably certain I haven't been the only target
Remember "Professors are the Enemy?"
The piece connects this to what is going on.
"Thiel has invested millions of dollars in support of Senate candidates campaigning on a free speech ticket. J D Vance, who reportedly received $10 million from Thiel... recently told a conference of the National Conservative movement that “professors are the enemy”, citing Nixon
Dear 'wide-eyed brown kids'. I'll be posting a short thread later about applications, research proposals, and recommendation letters, as a soft antidote to an appalling attack on young people passing as truth-telling about 'coolie labour' (get a grip) in academia.
You need three things to apply to arts/humanities PhD programmes in the USA and UK. It's not mysterious or opaque, really. 1. Strong research proposal 2. Transcripts 3. Two or three detailed reference letters.
1. Strong research proposal is non-negotiable. Don't send CVs-- no one looks at them, unless they specifically ask. You must offer a clear project, with details of what you will explore & how it contributes to current work in the field. Formulate a strong research question.
Have people seen piece by @NafeezAhmed in @BylineTimes which tracks the funding of rightwing so-called 'free speech' networks at Cambridge & elsewhere by Trump-supporting Republican billionaires? You should. It's terrifying, & explains a great deal. We knew along this was funded
I am still digesting it, will post more on Monday. All I can say is that it is grim, very grim. Palantir is all over the government; do we really need it and Peter Thiel running universities?
Cosy little networks close to government with many of your favourite retrogrades and usual suspects in it--the Tobies, the Nigels, the caliper-stroking. It should be Netflixed.
See all this effort put into slamming existing universities & making their own sandboxes is actually a huge concession on their part. It is an acknowledgement that they have lost two arguments within existing institutions, desperately though they are trying to flip those. (1/x)
The first is the intellectual argument. Scholarship, real scholarship of the peer reviewed variety, ranges across many political boundaries but it cannot, in accredited institutions, really, with force, make the case for the things these ghouls want to make the case for, i.e.
Old-school Empire; Race Science; Biological Essentialism; Free Market Absolutism; Hard ethnic Borders; Western Superiority; Strongman Leadership...the list can be expanded. So in order to bring these long discredited ideas to fore & give them patina of intellectual respectability
Bad enough having to defend the BBC but having to now defend Athena Swan ie. elite white cis women's professorial promotion scheme...Well, history is full of these ironies in a time of monsters.
I wouldn't compare Athena Swan to Stonewall. Completely different projects. But yes, at least there wa some understanding that gender is complex and not reducible to a gonad.
Amazingly, of course, The Silenced One would have herself benefited hugely from Athena Swan.
This is such nonsense. I wouldn't even shit on the Telegraph. I'm sorry for Alison, who is an amazing person, & angry that the really harassed & hounded are the victims of false flag opportunists like Kathleen Stock. I can only urge Alison to ignore it all, as I try & do.
I don't have a way to reach Alison, I don't think, can anyone who is in touch give her my love & tell her I'm there if she needs, to just email me or have someone send me her number? I'd rather use nettles for toilet paper than the desperate subtabloid Telegraph.
Oh, sorry, shouldn't have given her more publicity here. Too angry to pay attention.
But again, I emphasise: DO NOT take the Telegraph seriously, no one with half a brain & a thimblefull of integrity does. Even if there's shitty dark money behind these crusades.
Trust me, I & not a few others I know, have repeatedly thought about quitting our jobs. We've dealt with threats (including posters around down with our face on it), doxxing, editorials & tabloid hatchet jobs calling on our universities to fire us, twitter pile-ons, abuse
Vile racist & misogynist abuse. I've also dealt with outside extremist groups, e.g. Hindutva chauvinists egging a few misguided students to plaster the internet with fake claims, absurd one, easily disproved. We've dealt with "investigations" (in one case, one led by a transphobe
barrister) instigated by people who have white fragility meltdowns when challenged on race issues, complaints, double standards, discriminatory treatment, everyday racism & misogynoir, xenophobia, being called in to Head of Dept office. The whole fucking enchilada. Trust me.