A speech on hate speech (and #freespeech) last Friday in the Lords. Too many still argue that a defence of free speech is just a cynical means of allowing offensive views to be promoted... (1/4)
Hate (like offence) is subjective, and can be used to deligitimise debate. This has also become a problem in relation to politics - with sceptics of government policy on climate change called 'climate deniers' or people who question vaccine mandates as 'anti-vaxxers'... (2/4)
The category of hate is often used to shut down views we don't like. We can't take 'hate speech' at face value - it has become too broad and too overused to be any decent means of collecting date (as its supporters claim)... (3/4)
But more importantly, too many in power are cowardly in the face of cancel culture - it's time to call for courage, to stand up for free speech no matter whether it's hateful or not. (4/4)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🪡 A long-ish, angry speech in the Lords on #PlanB - and on the fact that official opposition have failed to oppose the government's introduction of further restrictions and #COVIDPassports... (1/5)
🪡 Issues like free social association, liberty and personal sovereignty are crucial - not some abstract notion to be dismissed as too many still do... (2/5)
🪡 Other peers raised the lack of efficacy about vaccine passports, or asked Qs about how serious Omicron is to health beyond high transmission, I wanted to stress the real collateral damage to a free society - when illiberal measures are a first, instead of last, resort... (3/5)
A long-ish speech on non-crime hate incidents today in the Lords. No one wants to look like they're being soft on 'hate', but this kind of non-crime 'incident' has a chilling effect in the form of self censorship... (1/4)
Hate crime can be incredibly subjective, and awareness-raising initiatives around reporting can encourage people to label all bad behaviour as criminal. (Much like the police ad van which trawled shopping centres warning people that being offensive could be a crime)... (2/4)
In a bill named the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, it is worrying that the police don't know what IS a crime, and what isn't. The confusion lies in the category of the 'non-crime hate incident' which encourages police overreach... (3/4)
Several of us tonight used what is merely a technical nod through of the Coronavirus Act in the House of Lords to make some comments on the use and abuse of legislation... (1/5)
Whatever about 18 months ago, we're NOT in an emergency now - so emergency legislation becomes a symbol of state power, a threat. There is little scrutiny for new laws (eg mandated vaccines for care workers, & 1000s of NHS staff possibly sacked if they refuse vaccines)... (2/5)
Just when government assures us 'no more general legislation', that the public will be trusted to take responsibility, the threat of CovidPassports returns - despite evidence to suggest they won't work in health terms AND will create a discriminatory two-tier society... (3/5)
The Environment Bill is in the Lords - cue lots of hyperbole re species at risk, nature spoiled, deforestation etc. But who decides what takes priority? Economic development or regulations to protect wildlife/biodiversity?... (1/4)
Conflict is obvious when it comes to eco qualms relating to mass house building and infrastructure. There should be a debate about these things, but cross-party consensus on all things green and a widespread demonisation of any critical thinking as denialism is a problem... (2/4)
There is much to argue over - should the precautionary principle be enshrined in law? Are plastics always bad - what about PPE? And will the Bill penalise developing countries, or are Greens the new neo-colonialists?... (3/4) #EnvironmentBill
My thoughts on amendment 87b to the #DomesticAbuseBill (making misogyny a hate crime). We shouldn't allow the tragedy of last week and the outrage over Sarah Everard's brutal murder to be exploited in a way that won't help women... (1/5)
While it's understandable that many have demanded action, we have to dispassionately consider the details of this law. We've been told that the police are institutionally misogynistic - do we really believe that the police hate women? Has misogyny become a catch-all term?...(2/5)
We're told that this is about accurately collecting data - but how do you quantify or record 'hate' reliably when it is based on the perception of the victim, rather than an understanding of the motive of the accused?...(3/5)
A late-night speech yesterday on an amendment in the #DomesticAbuseBill relating to smacking and children. There has been a rather grotesque conflation of 'battery' and 'smacking' - suggesting that every parent who smacks their child is committing a heinous criminal act... (1/4)
Violence and abuse against children is already against the law. Blurring the lines between what is intended to harm and injure and what is intended to discipline out of love is hugely damaging for families and denies the importance of intent and context...(2/4) #DomesticAbuseBill
How does it protect children to undermine parental authority? Parents are better placed to know how to raise their kids than endless lists of NGOs - even if they come waving state-approved best practice checklists about 'how to count to ten'...(3/4) #DomesticAbuseBill