It has been clear for a while that @ukhomeoffice is unfit to run the Windrush Compensation Scheme, and unwilling to make the kind of changes needed to fix it. You've probably seen us "calling" for the Scheme to be moved.
With @GoodLawProject, we have started the process to seek judicial review of @pritipatel's decision to keep control of the Windrush Compensation Scheme. It's a decision that is mind-boggling in one sense bc @ukhomeoffice is demonstrably terrible at running the scheme; [2/6]
but in another sense, it was inevitable - the HO does not and will never accept that Windrush victims need genuine reparation, and that the process should be approached in the same way as it would if the victims were white, wealthy and/or of a different social class. [3/6]
There is a big, existential conversation that must be had about the Home Office and its role in promulgating racism and social dysfunction. But Windrush compensation is extremely time-sensitive. By its own admission, *at least* 23 people have died without a penny. [4/6]
If we leave them to it, they'll carry on making tiny, inconsequential tweaks ad infinitum at the speed of pushing treacle up a hill. E.g., recently we saw that the Scheme is going on a hiring blast... TWO YEARS after chronic understaffing became clear. [5/6]
Victims see this - the HO is waiting for them to die out so it doesn't have to pay out.
This is shenanigans.
Give it up or come to court. [6/6]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The headlines are: (i) the Select Committee believes the Scheme should be administered independently, and isn't sure why it was ever run in-house, so to speak; (ii) total number eligible STILL UNKNOWN, low uptake of those known to be eligible; [2/]
(iii) applications *require* legal assistance, i.e. this is not a DIY job as @sajidjavid, @pritipatel and others have variously claimed. The SC recommends extending LASPO 2012 to cover this + says We Are Digital, which also has other @ukhomeoffice contracts, is insufficient; [3/]
This evening, the charity Justice launched their report on ‘Reforming the Windrush Compensation Scheme’ – we’ve not had the chance to read the full report yet but wanted to share some initial thoughts from the launch. [1/n]
The main themes of the report are a lack of trust among claimants, exacerbated by the lack of independence of the Scheme, a series of procedural and structural problems with the Scheme, and a general lack of compassion, empathy and respect in the handling of claims [2/n]
The main and most important (TL;DR) recommendation is that the Scheme should be taken away from the Home Office because the aims of the Scheme are undermined by the lack of independence of the Scheme. Cannot emphasise our agreement with this enough. [3/n]
Remember Sitting in Limbo? It's about Anthony Bryan and his wife, Janet McKay-Williams, 👌🏽 played by @peerobinson and @_NadineMarshall. It won an entire Bafta.
Guess how Anthony and Janet have been getting on with the Windrush Compensation Scheme?
1/26
@peerobinson@_NadineMarshall Anthony arrived as an 8 yr-old in 1965. In 2015, he was fired, and lost access to benefits and the NHS along with his income. He was then detained and threatened with deportation, then released, then detained and threatened with deportation. He became a shadow of himself.
2/26
@peerobinson@_NadineMarshall Janet held down the fort and supported him, putting her own life on hold. She chased MPs; compiled evidence; fought with staff at HO reporting centres; and with family and friends, scraped together the fees to win an injunction preventing Anthony's imminent deportation.
3/26
This eve, @Channel4News will feature an item on @RichardSBlack1. He came to Britain as a small child and lived here for many years before he was refused re-entry following a visit to Trinidad. That decision - which was wrong, as Richard was a citizen - has shaped his life. [1/7]
Richard was left destitute in Trinidad, and his family was carved up, with his then-wife and children able to remain in the UK. @ukhomeoffice materially altered the course of Richard’s life. But that’s not the worst of it. [2/7]
After publicity and a number of direct approaches, former Windrush Compensation Scheme head Tom Greig and others at @ukhomeoffice promised Richard he would be repatriated, at govt’s cost, THIS SUMMER.
As previously mentioned, Greig has been pulled off Windrush matters. [3/7]
🚨 alert, 🧵 alert: one of our members received a letter containing this little kicker today, in response to their application to the Windrush Compensation Scheme.
Join me on a journey of rage. [1/14]
This appears at the end of a letter requesting more information, which is something caseworkers can do according to the Casework Guidance, currently on version 7. The rules on requesting more evidence begin on p 89. [2/14] assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The claimant in question hasn't received any other demands or requests for evidence. They haven't even been told of an assigned caseworker. This is the first time they've seen a request for further evidence.
.@ukhomeoffice has never published full info on the proposed deportees, the crimes for which they were imprisoned, and the dates of release. No doubt there would be general bleating about data protection if there was an FOI, regardless of what deportees themselves said. [2/5]
The repeated refs to "murderers, rapists and paedophiles" requires laser-focus scrutiny bc it is inflammatory, it used as press-bait, and it may be a misrepresentation. *Many* of the people we have heard of aren't murderers, rapists or paedophiles. [3/5] theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/f…