First, the idea of Magazine cover as contrarian indicators, and especially TIME PoY was developed by one of Wall Street's greatest thinkers, Paul Macrae Montgomery.
I was honored to call him a friend. @ritholtz remembrance in 2014
One year later and Biden's approval rating is in the tank and Ds are figuring out what to do with Harris
4/15
2007 Putin was PoY. In 2008 the Russian stock market fell 75%.
5/15
In 1999 Jeff Bezos of Amazon was POY and the following year (2000) saw the peak of the 1990s tech stock mania.
BY 2001 Amazon’s stock was down 94% from its 1999 peak.
6/15
1997 Andy Grove of Intel was POY and Intel finished 1998 poorly.
7/15
1991 Ted Turner of Turner Broadcasting was POY. The next year his stock struggled.
8/15
In 1989 Soviet Union leader Mikhail Gorbachev was Person of the Decade (1980s).
Within two years his country ceased to exist, and he was living a meager life on a state-provided pension.
9/15
In 1979 the Ayatollah Khomeini was POY. Crude oil peaked in 1980 and held this level for a decade.
10/15
1974 Saudi King Faisal was POY. 1975, like 1980, each saw a major high in crude oil.
11/15
In 1966 the “under 25 generation” (baby boomers) was POY.
Econ historians will recognize 1966 as the beginning of the rise in inflation that ended in 1980. Boomers resource usage was a big reason.
Also, “Middle America” was POY in 1969 underscoring this theme.
12/15
1970 West German Chancellor Willy Brandt was PoY.
By May 1971, to support a struggling West Germany pulled out of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate agreement. The U.S. followed suit in August 1971.
The West German stock market finished 1971 down for the year.
13/15
In 1955 GM President Harlow Curtice was POY. That year GM became the first corp. ever to surpass $1B in sales.
This was also the year Engine Charlie Wilson, the former CEO of GM and Secretary of Defense said, “What’s good for General Motors is good for the country.”
14/15
In 1955 90% of all cars sold in the US were made by the big three, and 45% were GM cars. This was the high-water mark.
GM stocks struggled in 1956 and has yet to recover 65 years later!
15/15
Additionally in 1929 Walter Chrysler of the Chrysler Corp was POY.
This was the year the stock market crashed and the onset of the Great Depression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The problem is not mortgage rates, it's inventory (not enough).
Cut rates and home sellers raise prices, and monthly payments remain unchanged. The affordability problem remains. Greedy boomer homeowners get richer.
How to fix affordability?
Reduce zoning and building regulations to increase inventory. The problem is that selfish boomer homeowners wield these laws to restrict supply and drive up the price of their homes.
The Atlanta Federal Reserve calculates a Housing Affordability Monitor.
The median income in the United States (blue) and the income needed to qualify for a mortgage (detailed below the chart). The bottom panel shows the difference.
At 58%, this means one needs 58% more than the median income ($ 83k) to qualify for a median mortgage ($ 130k).
This is a new record, even greater than the peak before the housing crash from 2007 to 2009.
Home prices are too high. Cutting mortgage rates will only incentivize home sellers to increase their asking prices, and the problem persists.
We need more supply, that is what the record "unaffordability" is saying..
A home is considered “affordable” if it costs less than 30% of a household’s income.
The following chart indicates that the average home in the United States now costs 47% of the median household’s monthly income.
An all-time record, surpassing the bubble peak in 2006 before the housing crash.
The OMB Director and Acting CFPB Director @russvought laid out the charges of lying to Congress and mismanaging the renovation of the Fed (Eccles) building.
While the betting market still has Powell getting fired at less than 50%, it is now trending higher.
--
The Federal Reserve Act says that a Fed Governor (including the Chair) may be removed “for cause by the President.”
However, “for cause” is not defined in the statute and has never been tested in court in this context.
I would argue "for cause" is not a disagreement over Monetary Policy ("too late" cutting rates), but can be lying to Congress and/or mismanaging the rules around renovating the Fed (Eccles) building?
Powell said this to the Senate Banking Committee on June 25, 2025, as part of the semiannual Monetary Policy Report to Congress.
---
"Generally, I would just say we do take seriously our responsibility as stewards of the public’s money. ... There’s no VIP dining room. There’s no new marble—we took down the old marble, we’re putting it back up. We’ll have to use new marble where some of the old marble broke. But there’s no special elevators; there’s just old elevators that have been there. There are no new water features. There’s no beehives, and there’s no roof terrace gardens."
---
Technically, Powell is correct because the renovation has not been completed. However, such details are outlined in some plans for the renovations.
Is this a big deal? No. However, if Trump is looking for ANY reason to remove Powell, this might be enough. And it might be enough "for cause" that the Supreme Court will uphold it.
Furthermore, no one in Congress wants to spend any political capital defending a $2.5 billion marble Washington, D.C. building with private elevators, beehives, and private roof terraces.
---
Bottom line, Powell may have given Trump an opening to remove him. Will Trump take it?
Or, does Trump want/need "Too Late" Powell to stay as Fed Chairman until May 2026 to use as a punching bag?
Yesterday, Jim appeared on Bloomberg TV, warning that if the Fed cuts rates and the market thinks this is wrong, 10-year yields could surge through 5%.
(Perspective ... 10-year yields were last above 5% in October 2023 and as high as 4.85% in January).
🧵
2/8
President Trump disagrees with this thinking and believes the federal funds rate should be 1% right now.
From a "truth" posted on June 30.
3/8
If (or should I say when) Trump gets a Fed Chair to make 1% happen, how will the 10-year react?
Reminder of what happened last year to long rates when the Fed cuts rates (peach arrow) and the market does not think it's a good idea (cyan arrow).
I would argue that if the Fed cuts rates and you assume mortgage rates follow the federal funds rate lower (they may NOT be the case), home prices would rise, putting the monthly payment right back at $2,860.
Polymarket recession odds peaked at 65% on May 1st, the April ISM release date, suggesting Liberation Day and the 20% stock market correction did not damage the economy, as the "soft data" warned.
Subsequent April data confirmed this.
Will May see more of the same?
🧵
2/12
The prevailing narrative in the market for months has been that the labor market is going to fall apart, forcing the Fed to cut rates.
This has not happened, and so far, the "soft" (survey) data have been wildly off in predicting the economy.
3/12
ISM Employment upticked in May from April. The first monthly "May" data point suggests the labor market is still not weakening.