Jim Bianco Profile picture
Dec 13, 2021 15 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/15

As I noted before, TIME's Person of the Year is a good contrarian indicator.

Elon Musk was named 2021 PoY earlier today.

So, what is the history of this indicator? A thread to outline.

time.com/person-of-the-…
2/15

First, the idea of Magazine cover as contrarian indicators, and especially TIME PoY was developed by one of Wall Street's greatest thinkers, Paul Macrae Montgomery.

I was honored to call him a friend.
@ritholtz remembrance in 2014

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
3/15

Biden Harris was PoY last year (2020).

One year later and Biden's approval rating is in the tank and Ds are figuring out what to do with Harris
4/15

2007 Putin was PoY. In 2008 the Russian stock market fell 75%.
5/15

In 1999 Jeff Bezos of Amazon was POY and the following year (2000) saw the peak of the 1990s tech stock mania.

BY 2001 Amazon’s stock was down 94% from its 1999 peak.
6/15

1997 Andy Grove of Intel was POY and Intel finished 1998 poorly.
7/15

1991 Ted Turner of Turner Broadcasting was POY. The next year his stock struggled.
8/15

In 1989 Soviet Union leader Mikhail Gorbachev was Person of the Decade (1980s).

Within two years his country ceased to exist, and he was living a meager life on a state-provided pension.
9/15

In 1979 the Ayatollah Khomeini was POY. Crude oil peaked in 1980 and held this level for a decade.
10/15

1974 Saudi King Faisal was POY. 1975, like 1980, each saw a major high in crude oil.
11/15

In 1966 the “under 25 generation” (baby boomers) was POY.

Econ historians will recognize 1966 as the beginning of the rise in inflation that ended in 1980. Boomers resource usage was a big reason.

Also, “Middle America” was POY in 1969 underscoring this theme.
12/15

1970 West German Chancellor Willy Brandt was PoY.

By May 1971, to support a struggling West Germany pulled out of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate agreement. The U.S. followed suit in August 1971.

The West German stock market finished 1971 down for the year.
13/15

In 1955 GM President Harlow Curtice was POY. That year GM became the first corp. ever to surpass $1B in sales.

This was also the year Engine Charlie Wilson, the former CEO of GM and Secretary of Defense said, “What’s good for General Motors is good for the country.”
14/15

In 1955 90% of all cars sold in the US were made by the big three, and 45% were GM cars. This was the high-water mark.

GM stocks struggled in 1956 and has yet to recover 65 years later!
15/15

Additionally in 1929 Walter Chrysler of the Chrysler Corp was POY.

This was the year the stock market crashed and the onset of the Great Depression.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Bianco

Jim Bianco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @biancoresearch

Jul 24
1/10

Former NY Fed President Bill Dudley is out with an opinion piece arguing.

I’ve long been in the “higher for longer” camp, insisting that the US Federal Reserve must hold short-term interest rates at the current level or higher to get inflation under control.

The facts have changed, so I’ve changed my mind. The Fed should cut, preferably at next week’s policy-making meeting.

More from Dudley:

Most troubling, the three-month average unemployment rate is up 0.43 percentage point from its low point in the prior 12 months — very close to the 0.5 threshold that, as identified by the Sahm Rule, has invariably signaled a U.S. recession.
---
🧵on the issues this piece brings up.

tl:dr

Dudley's main "facts change" data point is the Sahm Rule is close to flashing a recession warning.

The problem is when millions of unemployed migrants flood into the country; the unemployment rate will rise.

Is this rise telling us the country’s demographics are changing, or is the economy slowing into a potential recession?

This question needs to be answered before economists like Dudley demand monetary policy adhere to the Sahm Rule.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/10

The Sahm Rule is now driving all economic decisions.

Former Federal Reserve Economist @Claudia_Sahm developed it, and it has a good track record for predicting recessions.

It is close to triggering a recession warning (bottom panel).
---
Definition:

Sahm Recession Indicator signals the start of a recession when the three-month moving average of the national unemployment rate (U3) rises by 0.50 percentage points or more relative to its three-month average low during the previous 12 months.Image
3/10

The top panel of the Sahm Rule chart above shows that the unemployment rate has increased over the last year. However, as the following chart shows, company hiring has not weakened significantly over the last year—not enough to warn of a recession like the one the Sahm Rule is close to triggering.

The U.S. economy should not be at risk of recession warnings when it is creating 177,000 jobs monthly.Image
Read 11 tweets
Jul 20
1/7

The most interesting question going into next week is whether the US economy is picking up.

Did it start with the release of the June data?

Is this going to frustrate a September rate cut?
🧵

Consider ....

Here is the Bloomberg Surprise Index. It bottomed on July 5, the nonfarm payroll release date. Since then, it has been trending higher. The move higher over the last five days (one business week) has been the biggest since September 2021 (bottom panel).

Bloomberg smooths this index with a six-month "decaying" moving average. This means the below-zero index, signifying worse-than-expected economic data, is an artifact of weaker data earlier this year. The recent surge in the last week is this Index dropping that older "decayed" data for new stronger data releases over the past several days.Image
2/7

The Atlanta Fed GDPnow bottomed on July 4, the day before payrolls. It was at 1.55%. Currently (July 19) it is at 2.73%.

So, all the data released this month, for June, have surged this estimate of Q2 2024 GDP by over 1.2% in just a couple of weeks. Image
3/7

Lastly, the Dallas Fed has a "Weekly Economic Index" (WEI) that is indexed to GDP.

It uses ten daily or weekly indicators to estimate GDP each week.

Here are the inputs. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 5
1/9

Since the 10 Spot ETFs started trading on January 11, they have collectively generated $14.6 billion in net new money. They peaked near $16 billion last month.

Collectively, these ETFs are the most successful ETF launches in history.

The problem might be they are successful for ETF providers but maybe not as much for BTC holders.

A 🧵to explain.Image
2/9

As I noted last month, most of this "new" ETF money was on-chain coins moved to regulated brokerage accounts that bought the BTC ETFs.

Of the peak inflows near $16 billion into BTC ETFs, only ~$3 billion was really "new" money into the BTC ecosystem.

3/9

The lack of a rally showed that the "new" money in the entire BTC ecosystem was small (~$3 billion). Despite all the bullish talk and "here come the boomers" proclamations, BTC peaked in March at $74k.

The BTC bulls were correct that near $16 billion of "new" money into the ecosystem should have pushed BTC to >$100k. However, it was not near $16 billion as most ETF flows came from on-chain accounts and not new fiat entering for the first time.

Further supporting this are the fears surrounding Mt. Gox liquidations. A total of $7.6 billion of BTC (140k BTC) is getting transferred. If $7.6 billion is hitting the price this much, and only a small portion will be liquidated for fiat, then near $16 billion of new BTC ETF money, if this was the case, should have skyrocketed the BTC price.

It did not happen.

forbes.com/sites/siladity…
Read 9 tweets
Jun 30
1/3

Breaking news Saturday night ... just as Biden arrives at the Hamptons fundraiser.

----

President Joe Biden is expected to discuss the future of his re-election campaign with family at Camp David on Sunday, following a nationally televised debate Thursday that left many fellow Democrats worried about his ability to beat former President Donald Trump in November, according to five people familiar with the matter.

nbcnews.com/politics/2024-…
2/3

Betting market reaction to this news ....

Notice who moved ahead of Gavin Newsom into second place for the Democrat nomination. Image
3/3

The last time Harris was ahead of Newsom for the Democrat Nomination ....

July 2022!! Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
1/4

Last week, BlackRock Admitted:

For now, about 80% of bitcoin ETF purchases have likely been coming from “self-directed investors who have made their own allocation, often through an online brokerage account."

cnbc.com/2024/06/16/adv…
2/4

The following chart shows that the average size of a Spot BTC ETF trade (blue) is just $14.6k, far less than any other ETFs that are very popular with Tradfi ... and about one-tenth the size of a SPY trade.

This is exactly what you'd expect if they buyer is retail Degens. Image
3/4

In other words, the chart above is consistent with BlackRock's statement that Tradfi is largely not playing. This blue line will go up when they start to play, which they are not doing now.

For now, the Spot BTC ETF buyer is a retail Degen, and as explained below, most of them came from on-chain accounts to a regulated brokerage account.

Read 4 tweets
Jun 14
1/8

Consumer Confidence came out today and contained a message for everyone interested in markets and the economy.

tl:dr - Consumer confidence came in much worse than expected. Driving this was Democrats turning sour on the economy. Behind this seems to be a big worry they are going to lose the election this fall.

Since so much of economic data is opinion surveys, like consumer confidence, economists will look at this data and conclude that it means the economy is worsening, not that these surveys are really political, not economic, opinions.

----

The University of Michigan put out its June estimate for Consumer Sentiment. It declined to 65.6, the lowest reading of 2024.Image
2/8

Bloomberg surveyed 50 economists, and they predicted Consumer Sentiment would rise from May's 69.1 to 72 in June. Instead, as shown above, it fell to 65.6.

Only one of the 50 economists had it this low. So, a big surprise. Image
3/8

What drove this downside surprise?

Here is a breakdown of consumer sentiment by (self-identified) political party.

You can see how partisanship drives one's outlook on the economy. What matters is your political identification and which party controls the White House, not an objective assessment of the economy.

Not that Democrat sentiment (blue) in June fell almost 7 points whereas Republican sentiment (red) fell less than 0.5 of a point.Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(