1) This is Orwellian dishonesty of an incredibly extreme type.
Let's get this clear, there is no such thing as "political correctness" or "wokery". These are entirely fabricated enemies to justify oppressive power grabs and changes to the law. theguardian.com/law/2021/dec/1…
2) "Political correctness", "wokery" or "woke culture" do not exist. There is no ideologies of these names were progressives are plotting to impose these ideologies on people. It is as I say a complete fabrication, an invented enemy that doesn't actually exist.
3) This is why I call it Orwellian, because in both "Animal Farm" and "1984" the dictatorships invent imaginary enemies and conspiracy to justify oppressive measures. This is exactly what Dominic Raab is doing here and arguing.
4) Whilst being over 60 and unashamedly progressive all my life, I have yet to encounter any progressive person arguing you must say or do that to be "politically correct" or "woke". Neither of these terms have ever been any sort of ideology in the way implied.
5) The impression given is there's some sort of ideology of "political correctness" or "wokeness" and an attempt to impose it on everyone by force. The only way of spreading such ideologies is through speeches or written arguments. Where are they, where is the evidence?
6) None of these ideologues spouting on about "political correctness" or "wokery" as if they are verbatim fact can produce one iota of evidence to back up their claims. I say the reason is because they are liars.
7) It is quite incredible that in the UK, we see the Secretary of State for Justice spouting fabricated conspiracy theories as a justification for implementing a sinister power grab and to utterly change the society in which we live.
8) It isn't a conspiracy theory that the Nazis used fabricated conspiracy theories to justify such power grabs, because that is what they actually did and there is hard evidence for it. Here we see it happening again.
9) This is on the back of a of the government's Policing, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, which will essentially make protests illegal, with up to 10 years in prison for any one who takes part in a banned protest. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
10) This government is also trying to push through an Elections Bill, which would require Voter ID and disenfranchise millions of people. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
11) Only a few weeks ago Kenneth Clarke a Conservative Party Minister under Margaret Thatcher, John Major and David Cameron warned we were dangerously close to an elected dictatorship. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
12) In other words, the only real evidence of a conspiracy is that of this government trying to impose an authoritarian dictatorship on us, by fabricating none existent conspiracies as a pretext for this power grab.
1) Only large scale system change can prevent the eventual collapse of our civilization through the unsustainability of our present system, and the eventual impacts of the climate and ecological crisis. This is not a doomster perspective, this catastrophe is entirely avoidable.🧵
2) In this thread I want to highlight what it is that makes our current system totally unsustainable. I will look at this from a systems perspective and point towards the trends and trajectories leading to this point, and what we need to change to avoid this.
3) The primary feature of our present system developed during the industrial revolution is that it is a free market economy, focused on economic growth. Where successful individuals can accumulate unlimited wealth and possessions.
1) Just a quick note to anti-maskers, mask-sceptics and associated science deniers. The primary purpose of wearing a mask in confined public spaces is to protect other people from virus spread by infected people. See this video as to how it works.🧵
2) The COVID virus is primarily transmitted by an infected person exhaling droplets carrying the virus, with a largely invisible plume being projected in front and around them, every time they exhale, cough or sneeze. gov.uk/government/pub…
3) As the video demonstrates any sort of face mask greatly reduces the spread of this plume of potentially infected droplets, drastically reducing the likelihood of nearby people becoming infected. It really is that simple.
1) We need to talk about the way doomism is being used by certain climate scientists as a pejorative term for many climate activists. It's necessary to discuss this, because post COP26 this term is being widely abused and used against anyone questioning the efficacy of COP talks.
2) I've not been follow this whole narrative enought to know the exact origin of this narrative. However, climate scientist Michael Mann seems to be instrumental in it's current usage. theguardian.com/environment/20…
3) Quite frankly I've been baffled by Mann's whole framing of what he calls doomism, or doom-mongering, because his whole framing of it seems misconstrued. The people he and others following his lead are accusing of being doomists, self-evidently aren't what they are accused of.
Total climate ignoramus Andrew Neil, who has such bad judgement that he inadvertently fronted an extreme right wing populist TV channel without knowing what it was, now wants to return to mainstream TV to misinform the public about the climate crisis. theguardian.com/media/2021/nov…
Nothing better illustrates the obstacle to addressing the climate crisis. A bunch of very powerful and influential people, who control everything believe they know best when it comes to the climate and ecological crisis.
The only thing all of these people have in common is a complete lack of knowledge about the subject. None of them have any formal qualifications in a relevant subject, and at best they have done some very cherry-picked shallow reading.
I thought it was a good time to remind people of this. In 2016, journalist Roberto Saviano, who wrote books exposing the workings of the Italian mafia, said that the UK was the most corrupt country in the world, and supported his assertions. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…?
He said it was the London financial centre that was the centre of this corruption. You know, one of the major centres for financing the fossil fuel industry, which is one of the gravest threats to humanity.
It was the UK who taught effective torture methods to the Brazilian military dictatorship. They called it the "English Method". It's no coincidence that so many despots send their sons to English public schools and Sandhurst. boingboing.net/2014/05/30/the…
The only good thing to come out of COP26 is that at least we now know with absolute certainty that our current leadership/system is utterly incapable of meaningfully addressing the climate and ecological emergency.
What inspired me to write this scathing response is good people, experts, have wasted the best part of 30 years engaging with politicians who quite clearly don't want to do anything meaningful, and who are actually far more concerned about protecting the fossil fuel industry.
The fact that governments still provide this obscene level of subsidies to the fossil fuel industry, 30 years after they were supposed to be reducing emissions, and by implication fossil fuel burning, says they're utterly disingenuous in their sentiment. theguardian.com/environment/20…