1/6 Imagine that: Omicron is undergoing phenomenally fast exponential growth in the US, just like in the UK, Denmark, and South Africa. Crossing the Atlantic didn't impair its transmissibility. Who could've guessed?
2/6 Take it from the master himself, Trevor B: "There is an inevitable very large wave of Omicron. It's going to happen." nytimes.com/live/2021/12/1…
3/6 There's such an air of fatalism around all this, as if we are utterly incapable of doing anything that could dampen or avert a devastating Omicron wave. Hospitals are already at max capacity in many states. An Omicron tsunami approaches, & we collectively shrug our shoulders.
4/6 Epidemiologist @sanghyuk_shin of UC Irvine: "We need to take this seriously, starting now. If we have learned anything on how this virus operates—it’s that any kind of mitigation, the earlier the better...." voiceofoc.org/2021/12/local-…
5/6 "...There is really no evidence that suggests that Omicron is going to be mild, there’s no evidence that it is less virulent."
6/6 At a company Christmas party at an Oslo restaurant, 80 out of 111 young (ages 30-50), 2-dose vaccinated Norwegians were infected with Omicron. Only 1 of the 80 was asymptomatic (none hospitalized). I've never heard of an asymptomatic rate so low. It doesn't suggest mildness.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fantastic review on chronic SARS-CoV-2 infections by virological superstars Richard Neher & Alex Sigal in Nature Microbiology. I’ll do a short overview, outline a couple minor quibbles, & defend the honor of ORF9b w/some stats & 3 striking sequences from the past week.
1/64
First, let me say that this is well-written, extremely readable, and accessible to non-experts, so you should go read the full paper yourself, if you can find a way to access it. (Just realized it’s paywalled, ugh.) 2/64nature.com/articles/s4157…
Neher & Sigal focus on the 2 most important aspects of SARS-CoV-2 persistence: its relationship to Long Covid (including increased risk of adverse health events) & its vital importance to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants. I’ll focus on the evolutionary aspects.
3/64
In SARS-2 evolution, amino acid (AA) mutations get the lion’s share of attention—& rightfully so, as noncoding & synonymous nucleotide muts—which cause no AA change‚ are mostly inconsequential. But there are many exceptions, including a possible new one I find intriguing. 1/30
I’ll discuss four categories of such “silent” mutations, two of which might be involved in the recent growth of one synonymous mutation.
Maybe the single most remarkable example of convergent evolution in SARS-CoV-2 involves noncoding mutations: the multitude of muts in major variants that have pulverized the nucleocapsid (N) Kozak sequence.
I wrote about this below & a few other 🧵s 3/
@SolidEvidence There was yet another paper this week describing someone chronically infected, with serious symptoms, but who repeatedly tested negative for everything with nasopharyngeal swabs. On bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), they were Covid-positive. 1/ ijidonline.com/article/S1201-…
@SolidEvidence BAL is very rarely performed, yet there must be dozens of documented cases now where NP-swab PRC-negative patients who were very ill tested positive by BAL. This has to be way more common than we realize.
If we had a similar GI test, I imagine we'd find something similar. 2/
@SolidEvidence Importantly, the patient was treated and improved, likely clearing the virus for good. Many, maybe most, chronic infections could be treated and cleared. But they have to know they're infected for that to happen. 3/
Read full 🧵for explanation, but the short story is that the best apparent escape mutations all interact w/something else—like a nearby spike protomer or other important AA—making mutations there prohibitively costly.
In short, the virus has mutated itself into a corner. 2/6
It's very hard to effectively mutate out such a local fitness peak via stepwise mutation in circulation since multiple simultaneous muts might be required to reach a higher fitness peak. 3/6
It's an interesting thought. I think the evidence is strong that all new, divergent variants have derived from chronic infections. The first wave of such variants—Alpha, Beta, Gamma—IMO involved chronic infections lasting probably ~5-7 months. It's controversial to say.... 1/15
…that Delta originated in a chronic infection, but I think the evidence that it did is strong. One characteristic of chronic-infection branches is a high rate of non-synonymous nucleotide (nuc) substitutions (subs)—i.e. ones that result in an amino acid (AA) change. 2/15
For example, if 80% of nuc subs in coding regions cause an AA change, that’s a very high nonsynonymous rate. The branch leading to Delta has 17 AA changes—from just *15* nuc subs! That’s over 100%. How is this possible? 3/15