The D.C. AG v. insurrectionists lawsuit.

The complaint is here: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2115…

My, what a lot of defendants (with room to add more).

The AG wants them on the hook for the cost of the damages, including punitive damages and attorney fees.

1/
The complaint alleges that these groups formed for the purpose of perpetuating violence.

It appears that the Oath Keepers took Reagan's statement that "government is the problem" to heart.

2/
"We will have to get violent to stop this."

Excuse me while I have a little rant:

These ⤵️are the kinds of details coming out in the indictments which Doom Twitter ignores because these are the "little guys" and so who cares?

Rant over.

Carry on.

3/
The complaint gives the violent history of the oath keepers, and the efforts of both groups to "Incite coordinated violence around the 2020 presidential election."

They used Trump's loss to recruit new members, who they called the "duly elected president."

4/
These details are to show that this wasn't an isolated event or something that they were riled to do at the moment. It was meticulously planned.

Premediated crimes are always worse.

They also conspired to undermine the formal voting process (also a crime.)

5/
The overarching point: "This was a coordinated plan for violence." #1

It will be "wild," they say.
Trump used that same word when he called people to D.C.

What a coincidence!

6/
("You are not "gentlemen,"⤵️ Teri says in her schoolmarm voice. Screenshot #1)

The Proud Boys will go "incognito." I mean how stupid do they think law enforcement is? FBI: "They're not wearing the right colors so we can't figure out who they are." 🙄 #2

7/
Very clear goals here. #1 and #2

There seems to be a dialogue between Trump and these particular "supporters." (#3 and #4)

(I have to take a bit of a break. Will return and keep reading later.)

8/
This makes it hard for Defendant Pezzola to say, "It wasn't me." #1

If you read good detective novels and watch thrillers, you might have the idea that people who commit crimes are masterminds. Generally . . . no. See #2

9/
Here they are, beating up a police officer. Save this for the next time a right-winger tells you that blue lives matter. # 1 and #2

The members of congress being evacuated are wearing gas masks. Many are now covering for the insurrectionists. #2

10/
They are gleefully coordinating their communication.

It's like they are absolutely giddy with the idea that they get to hurt and kill. #1

At least 65 Metropolitan Police officers were injured. #2

11/
Counts: 42 U.S.C. § 1985(1)
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42…
Against all defendants.

42 U.S. Code § 1986
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42…
Against all defendants.

Assault.
Battery.
Intentional infliction of emotional distress.

12/
Here's the problem for Republicans. (Actually, two faces of the same problem.)

First: These guys are their "base." Given the changing demographics, without them, they have no hope of winning anything other than very local elections.

Second. . .

13/
Second, they secretly sympathize. They think the federal government IS the problem. They dislike what the federal government has become since the New Deal and Civil Rights movement. They want all power to be local. They'd love to disband the entire federal government.

14/
The difference between putting DeJoy in charge of the USPS and storming the capital is a matter of degree.

You can either dismantle the federal government slowly or bring in wrecking balls.

To answer a few questions I see . . .

15/
This is how they leave open the possibility of adding new defendants ⤵️ as more people get charged criminally.

These defendants have already been charged criminally. (I think they all have)

(When I read this, I thought 'only 50' more?😆)

16/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

16 Dec
If he pleads the fifth to questions that cannot have any criminal liability, it will mean he's once more stonewalling.
Remember the committee did not refer him for criminal sanctions to force compliance.

This was punishment.

By showing up, he's hoping to lessen his criminal liability for the previous contempt.

What I'm saying is that I don't think it will work.
People wondered why the committee didn't take steps to try to force compliance.

In addition to complications in trying this (Congress is not situated like a Grand Jury) Schiff indicated that the committee knows he'll just keep jerking them around.
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec
Jim Jordan basically says, "All I did was forward that text."

He's offering somewhat of a denial, which is better than "so what?"

I suspect that eventually, we will get to "so what? Nothing wrong with sending around such a text." Image
Basically, the text says that the Electoral Count Act was unconstitutional, so it should be disregarded.

Among the problems is this: You can't change the rules by which the election results are tabulated after the counting of the votes. You can't change the rules after the game. Image
"I know I have cookie crumbs on my face, but I swear I wasn't the one who took the cookie."

(Although my expectations for these guys are so low I'm actually glad he isn't already digging in and saying there was nothing wrong with the text.)

Read 4 tweets
15 Dec
Here is what's mind-boggling.

Mark Meadows willingly turned these messages over to the select committee, but then, enraged, put the brakes on his cooperation when the committee wanted his private phone records.

1/
If he willingly turned over those messages, imagine what his phone records reveal.

He filed this suit to try to keep the committee from learning what's in them.

2/

It seems to me (and this is a guess, I've never done an investigation like this—my work was criminal defense)
the committee is releasing these to put pressure on the holdouts. It's like saying, "We know what's going on so you may as well come clean."

3/
Read 5 tweets
15 Dec
It isn't that nothing is happening. It's that too much is happening for people to focus.

Remember Benghazi? The only thing happening was a made-up scandal. There weren't any real scandals so there was nothing else to talk about.

Now there's too much.
washingtonpost.com/politics/donal…

1/
Made-up scandals can capture the public imagination because they're simple. The entire "scandal" can be boiled down to one sentence.

That's the beauty of lies. They're easily digestible.

The truth is complicated. It's multifaced. Real scandals have lots of details.

2/
Complicated crimes have lots of moving parts. It's too much to digest. So instead, people prefer simple lies ⤵️

Timothy Snyder calls them "Internet Triggers."

Reality is complicated and nuanced.

Lies are easy.

Can enough people embrace complicty?
Will truth win?

3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
15 Dec
Now, I wonder who Eastman was calling from his private cell phone?

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

It looks like most of his argument rests on the same arguments that Trump is trying in his executive privilege case: Challenging the legitimacy of the select committee itself.

1/
About these subpoenas: lawfareblog.com/does-carpenter…
He's gonna lose this.

I get that it's a stall technique, but it can't work for long.

It also makes him look super guilty.

2/
The subpoena looks narrowly tailored to me. Without seeing it (and I've only read up to page 2) it looks like they want to know who he was talking to in the months leading up to the insurrection.

He gives a few arguments for why the subpoena should be held to be invalid.

3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
14 Dec
Oh my goodness. On January 6, as the riot was on going, a lawmaker texted to Meadows that Pence should unilaterally throw out votes. (Is anyone else listening? Did I hear that right?)

Others were beginning Trump to call this off.
They are not yet revealing the name of the lawmaker because the investigation is ongoing.

🔥Yowie.

On Jan. 7, a lawmaker apologized that nothing "worked." (translation: Darn. We failed.)
It's clear that the committee made the strategic decision to drop a few bombshells.

They clearly decided that the investigation is far enough along for them to do this.

It is a way to up the pressure on the people holding out.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(