A review of VIRAL: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19 by a scientist or journalist who has placed all their bets on a natural #OriginOfCovid:
"I have not read the book, but I already know it is antiscientific & hateful. How dare they not discuss my favorite niche hypothesis!"
"I have not read the book, but I already know it is antiscientific & hateful. How dare they not discuss my favorite niche hypothesis!"
"How could prominent scientists dare to enjoy VIRAL: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19 by Alina Chan and @mattwridley! All of my friends who could lose their careers and reputations if Covid came from a lab told me that this book sux!!"
amzn.to/3m85kDl
amzn.to/3m85kDl
"Surely Alina Chan and @mattwridley must be stretching the facts if their book insists that both natural and lab #OriginOfCovid hypotheses remain plausible and deserve full investigation. My scientist friends who said a lab leak was a conspiracy theory can't be wrong."
@mattwridley From virologists who tore through VIRAL: The Search for the Origin Of Covid-19 but could not find a single error...
"People who read this god awful book will see so much evidence pointing at a lab #OriginOfCovid There must be something wrong in the book but I can't find it."
"People who read this god awful book will see so much evidence pointing at a lab #OriginOfCovid There must be something wrong in the book but I can't find it."
Even better one:
"There are so many errors in this book that I cannot even identify a single important one to tweet about right now. I'm busy writing up a long analytical piece about it. Promise I'm not making excuses! I'll post it soon through the proper channels."
"There are so many errors in this book that I cannot even identify a single important one to tweet about right now. I'm busy writing up a long analytical piece about it. Promise I'm not making excuses! I'll post it soon through the proper channels."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
