Nominal retail sales up 0.3% in November, last 2 months revised down. Well below expectations & reflects a reduction in inflation-adjusted sales.
BUT, I always like to step back and focus more on what we know than the new increment. And what we know is retail sales remain high.
That last tweet was nominal retail sales. About two-thirds of that increased spending reflects higher prices but one-third reflects people purchasing more. Real sales are converging back to pre-pandemic trends but very slowly. We're way, way, way past pent up demand.
The retail sales release mostly covers goods but it gives us a glimpse of one particular service: food services & drinking places. Nominal sales back on track in this sector but prices are up so real sales are a still a bit off--and have not really risen since Delta emerged.
My favorite in this release is sporting goods, hobby, musical instruments and book stores. Wow that's a lot.
Of course autos are 15X more important for the economy, spending is up in nominal terms but quantities are down.
All in the bean counters are expecting about 7 percent GDP growth (annual rate) in Q4. Would be very, very strong.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Broadly speaking what has happened is core services inflation as only slowed a little (less than people were hoping on lagged shelter) while goods prices have started rising--with unusually large auto price increases in November that could still be hurricane-related.
I believe it is useful to make small contributions to big things (many engaged in doing that now) & also bigger contributions to small things.
On the later, in @BostonGlobe I argue for zoning reform to enable Cambridge to help build more than 1,000 additional housing units.
A🧵
States and localities can resist the likely regressive thrust of federal policymaking while doing what they can to build a more progressive, inclusive and upwardly mobile society.
To do that we need cheaper housing.
And to do that we need more housing.
VP Harris was right to set a goal of building 3 million housing units. On a proportional basis that would require 1,050 from Cambridge. Unfortunately on current course we'll get 100. But with reforms proposed by the City Council that could be raised to more than 1,000.
I know many skeptics of prediction markets. I don't have an ideological faith in them (OK, maybe quasi ideological). But the empirical evidence is they have worked really, really, really well. And did again on Tuesday night.
A short 🧵 about this remarkable picture.
Markets gave Trump a 60% chance. How does that prove they know what they're doing? If Harris won could say, "but she had a 40% chance" so wasn't wrong.
That's correct. Can only judge when you've seen them many, many times. Do 60% chance things happen 60% of the time?
In Ec10 we should them 15 million data points from sports betting from @andrewlilley_au comparing the prediction market probability to the outcomes.
And guess what: if you collect 100 markets with a 6% chance of a team winning and look at the results you'll see them win 6 times.
The macroeconomy is strong--high growth, low unemployment, falling inflation--the best of any advanced economy.
But there was a reluctance to present/understand how families were still not out of the deep inflation hole. And too much masked by cherrypicking/misleading stats.
IF Donald Trump had been President for the last 4 yrs here are some stats you would have heard more from progressives. Relative to 2019:
--Real median household income down 0.7%
--3m more people in poverty (poverty rate up 0.6pp)
--Unemp rate up 0.6pp
--Mortgage rate up 3pp
To be clear: Not claiming these were or weren't Biden-Harris's fault (e.g., if Congress had passed their child tax credit maybe poverty down). Also not saying that they are the only objective perspective on economy (I omit positive data). But under appreciated by progressives.
I was asked to recommend 5 books on economic policy by @nytimesbooks--ostensibly to help people make up their minds for this election but even if you don't have time to read them before voting the issues will still be relevant in 2028, 2032, etc.
One tweet for each.
1. The Little Book of Economics by @greg_ip
I was looking for a primer on deficits, inflation & other macro issues. I had this on my shelf unread but a colleague suggested it for this purpose--and it fit the bill perfectly.
Except is really The Little Book of MACROeconomics...
2. Career and Family by @PikaGoldin
Microeconomics centers around scarcity and there may be nothing more scarce than our time. And no more difficult tradeoff for many than career and family.
This book is the culmination of the work that earned Goldin the Nobel Prize.