(🔒) RETRO: The Top 100 Unreleased Nintendo Entertainment System Games—All of Which You Can Play Right Now
Most who follow this feed are politicos, not gamers, so the significance of this report may be unclear. Gamers know—and I hope will share it widely. retrostack.substack.com/p/the-top-100-…
1/ The gaming world is facing the loss of some of its most important artworks: unreleased NES prototypes (the NES being the most important video game console in history, and gaming being the top entertainment industry in the world) that are bought by investors and *hidden away*.
2/ There's been a massive effort by preservations like @FrankCifaldi to rescue these artifacts before they disappear forever. And I mean *forever*: in many cases only one prototype cart of an unreleased NES game exists. This effort is advocated for by experts like @PatTheNESpunk.
3/ What I wanted to do, as part of my series of NES-oriented video game curatorial journalism at RETRO, is create the largest list of *currently playable* unreleased NES games available anywhere, *and* to also—as a video game critic—give a sense of which ones are worth playing.
4/ Some of these games are instant classics—which means that their discovery is like discovering a major artwork never previously known to exist, and not just an artwork you can look at but one you can interact with for many, many hours. These games can be meaningful to millions.
5/ I recognize this list may attract some controversy—as there's some dispute over exactly what constitutes an "unreleased" NES game. In certain respects I have handcuffed myself by *excluding* games others deem unreleased, and in some spots I likely included games others do not.
6/ Either way, this is the longest list of its kind ever published by any media outlet in the gaming industry, and I think it is notable not only for its length but for the fact that it is limited to games that anyone reading the list could start playing in the next five minutes.
7/ In this respect, I think this RETRO report can be a valuable doorway to a new world of retro gaming many gamers had no idea of previously. The Top 100 ranking is preceded by a long essay, many gameplay videos, lists of still-being-hunted-for unreleased NES games and much more.
8/ The upshot: I believe that, when the dust settles, the NES will have the largest game library in the history of gaming—larger, even, than the 2,000+ title PlayStation 2 library. Emulators, ROMs, localizations, homebrews, and unreleased "archival" finds will make this possible.
9/ If you ever loved the NES; if you love retro gaming generally; if you consider video games art; if you're interested in seeing how curatorial journalism applies to spheres besides the political; I hope you'll check out my ongoing NES reporting at RETRO. retrostack.substack.com
10/ As the many of you who are full RETRO subscribers know, RETRO doesn't only focus on video games—or even mostly on gaming. The publication looks at any and all art from the past (book, film, toy, comic, music) that's still of enormous value. Thus, this: retrostack.substack.com/p/retro-recomm…
(PS) If you are a gamer and have played any of the 100 unreleased NES games in this ranking, please let me know what you think of them—and whether you think I have them ranked too high or too low. I'm already prepared to be told that Street Fighter II (for the *NES*!) is too low.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Trump-Ukraine scandal we were told not to focus on beyond a single call—and which I wrote a bestseller on—had as its aim the theft of the election. Guess who PROOF OF CORRUPTION said was at the plot’s heart?
Most Americans will have no idea of the significance of this Rick Perry text, because major media did nothing to inform them of the sprawling Trump-Ukraine scandal aimed at the heart of the 2020 election. Media deemed the story too complex to report—now we’ll all suffer for that.
Perry’s job was to help Trump bribe foreign officials into publishing info about Biden they knew was false—thereby helping Trump steal the election. Here, Perry is aiding a foreign national-supported coup by embracing disinformation and implying Trump is above the law.
The lack of an answer to this question is the most significant cause of burnout among leading January 6 researchers and journalists.
DOJ has given us nothing—nothing—to sustain us as we find ourselves fearing we care about rule of law and the future of America more than it does.
If AG Garland doesn’t pursue the coup *plotters*, he’ll rightly go down as one of the worst AGs in US history. And if Biden presides over a de facto amnesty for insurrectionist kingpins that leads to the end of our democracy in 2024, he will have been one of our worst presidents.
Many non-lawyers don’t know you can’t claim your answers to questions would tend to incriminate you to avoid a subpoena then give a press conference declaring you did nothing wrong
Stone’s actions won’t stand, and he will end up being charged with Contempt of Congress
What supervillain Roger Stone needed to do if he wanted to take this approach was answer as many questions as possible, assert the Fifth Amendment to any questions he/his lawyer felt may tend to incriminate him, then for the first time in his sad life not give a press conference
Normally it’s difficult to assess if an invocation of the Fifth Amendment has been made in good faith, but it’s not difficult when immediately after the invocation the witness gives a televised presser saying he couldn’t possibly incriminate himself because he "did nothing wrong"
(THREAD) With the BREAKING NEWS that Trump adviser Roger Stone told Congress his testimony about January 6 would tend to incriminate him and subject him to prosecution, PROOF is posting this thread of its reporting on Stone—for which Stone threatened to sue PROOF. Please RETWEET.
(NOTE) This thread will lengthy and chronological—ranging from the first PROOF report on Stone's January 6 actions to the most recent. Many of the articles in this thread are free, some are only for subscribers ($5/month). You can subscribe to PROOF below: sethabramson.substack.com
I’ll admit to being a bit mystified by the January 6th evidence that major media chooses to focus on. Is it *interesting* that some personalities from FNC texted Meadows on January 6th? Sure. Does it rank in the top 500 most important pieces of evidence regarding January 6th? No.
Major media has some excellent lawyers working for it who do a good job—and could probably do an even better job—directing Americans to the January 6th evidence most significant for future coup-plotter prosecutions. And a text from Laura Ingraham ain’t it. Let’s get serious here.
I think major media was excited about the FNC texts because they gave certain outlets a chance to goose a competitor, report on people it knows viewers love to hate, and point out far-right hypocrisies. But are any of those tasks *new and important* ones—or are they old standbys?