Share this page!

Peter Kalmus Profile picture
Twitter logo
17 Dec, 4 tweets, 2 min read
No, @nytimes the planet isn't "failing." It is being actively destroyed, irreversibly, by the fossil fuel capitalists. Image
Also, @nytimes, you say that the solution is carbon capture. You are wrong. The solution, obviously, is to end the fossil fuel industry. Why can't you just say it?
To even think for a moment that THIS could save us when we now have roughly five years left before locking in 1.5°C at current emissions rates. Not even @nytimes editors grasp the depth of the emergency we are in. #EmergencyMode
What might save us, instead, is reprioritizing everything and ending the fossil fuel industry. We all must now be very direct about this. Everyone within the establishment keeps avoiding this simple, obvious truth like they have blinders on.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Peter Kalmus

Peter Kalmus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateHuman

Peter Kalmus Profile picture
1 Dec
This is a mind-blowing simulation from a team led by @RommieAmaro, and with stunning visualizations. Truly fascinating. Einstein would have loved to see it.
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
There have been a few other times when I felt the awe of being "transported" into the world of the very small. A foray into scanning tunneling microscopy in a lab class, and research involving modeling molecular rotational transitions, both as an undergrad. 'k back to climate
I just want to add, what a truly bizarre species we are. That we can accomplish so much, but can't take obvious, and not even very hard steps collectively to safeguard the habitability of our planet.
Read 4 tweets
Peter Kalmus Profile picture
20 Nov
Did you know that the rate of mean sea-level rise has roughly doubled since the 80s and 90s? Currently at about 4 mm per year. That may not sound like much, but it's 4 mm of inexorable ocean rise, every year, and it's accelerating rapidly.
Sea-level rise isn't even what keeps me up at night, though. That would be the coming extreme heat waves, crop failures, ecosystem death, and geopolitical instability! #EmergencyMode #EndFossilFuels
I don't see any way to sugar coat this, or that sugar coating it is in any way useful. But, here are some general guiding ideas on climate activism that may be helpful. Ultimately though, how you create change is up to you. It's a grand, joyful experiment.
Read 4 tweets
Peter Kalmus Profile picture
17 Nov
All ads from fossil fuel corporations should now be illegal. Period.
Fossil fuel ads routinely misinform to promote neocide and the destruction of our planet for profit. The fact that they are not yet illegal, even as climate breaks down all around us, is evidence of how the industry has captured our legislative process and our media.
Here is an inside look at how it worked for one misleading ad at the NYT. @emorwee
heated.world/p/how-exxon-du…
Read 4 tweets
Peter Kalmus Profile picture
17 Nov
I wanted to clarify where we're at with global heating. You may see 1.1°C sometimes, and 1.2°C other times. 1.1°C is for the 2011-2020 (decadal) mean, and 1.2°C is about where we are right now.

Every 5 years this goes up about another 0.1°C.
Humanity emits more than 1,000 metric tons of CO2 each second, or over 40 billion tons per year, mainly from burning fossil fuels. The richest 1% emit more than twice what the bottom 50% of humans emit.

(part of why we can't keep supporting this ultra-rich ruling class anymore)
The IPCC estimates there are about 200 billion tons left to emit and still have a two-thirds chance to stay below 1.5°C. So that's 5 years from now. Just like the Bowie song. That's why this year is so incredibly important.
Read 8 tweets
Peter Kalmus Profile picture
12 Nov
I'm happy I wasn't there, tbh. Not worth the travel emissions
This was a staged event, by and for the fossil fuel industry - which was the biggest and most powerful delegation present
The fossil fuel barons are certainly laughing at how easily - and cheaply - they captured our politicians, our media, and our academia. Little do they know that ultimately they are just as fucked as anyone. Fools. Absolute fools.
Read 4 tweets
Peter Kalmus Profile picture
6 Nov
Oil spills are bad but the true devastation is when everything works as designed, the oil is burned, the planet heats up, and irreversible climate and ecological breakdown moves up another ratchet.

Immediacy bias in risk assessment. Helps explain climate inaction.
Truly surprising to me, how few people see this.
I think it is the same mechanism that allows people to feel burning fossil fuel is still OK, e.g. plane flights. They don't see the devastation - there are no oil-covered birds, the damage is indirect, the linkages are abstract - so they do not think of it or are bothered by it.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @ClimateHuman has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @ClimateHuman!

Read all threads by @ClimateHuman

:(