INFILTRATION: okay, a bit of dust has settled so I'm going to try to explain one particular aspect of why the way organisations react to having #safeguarding concerns raised with them is important. This thread is inspired by recent events but is not about them specifically.
The risk to children is ever present. The National Crime Agency's most recent estimate is that there are between 550,000 and 850,000 people (almost all of them men) who pose a risk to children IN THE UK ALONE.
standard.co.uk/news/uk/nca-fa…
Men who abuse children don't go about wearing dirty old macs. They are often charismatic, engaging, and charming. They work hard to gain trust. They do good deeds. You'll like them. These men circle anywhere children or their parents are, working out ways to gain access.
They are patient. They test and push boundaries carefully and slowly. And little by little, they insinuate themselves into positions of trust where they have access either directly to children or through their parents.
If you are part of any group working with or advocating for children, you need to be aware of this. And perhaps, one day, someone who is part of your group says or does something that others raise concerns with you about.
It might just be an off colour joke that landed wrong. Or it might be something not meant but a bit extreme said in the heat of the moment during an argument. Or it might be a naive misunderstanding of #safeguarding. Or it might be a serious red flag.
It doesn't matter which. Because you work with or for children and opportunist predators are observing and assessing - can I infiltrate this group? Will they notice? Are they on the ball? If you're on the ball, they'll walk away. Look somewhere else.
If you ignore #safeguarding concerns raised privately and those concerned end up challenging you directly in public in frustration, what you have done is advertise a flashing neon sign: INFILTRATING ABUSERS WELCOME HERE..
If you say, "How dare you? Our group member is pure of heart and has our complete trust regardless of what you say," you have shown that charming, charismatic abuser observing you a flashing neon sign: INFILTRATING ABUSERS WELCOME HERE..
If you say, "We work with parents not directly with children so don't need to take child #safeguarding into account," what you have done is advertise a flashing neon sign: INFILTRATING ABUSERS WELCOME HERE.
Grooming parents and other people who work with children is an intrinsic part of child abuse because it is they who give access to children. It could be the brilliant sports coach, the committed teacher. Or the lovely boyfriend a single mother found on a dating app.
If you discredit women who raise concerns by smearing them, patronising them with the sexist assumption they don't know what they're talking about or construct conspiracy theories about them, what you've done is advertise a flashing neon sign: INFILTRATING ABUSERS WELCOME HERE..
Back to your person who slipped up. The outcome might be that you simply need a conversation. Or you might impose a social media policy. You might mandate #safeguarding training. You might need to part ways. It depends.
But whichever is needed, what's important is that you have not hung out that neon sign blaring out to every observing predator: INFILTRATING ABUSERS WELCOME HERE.
It doesn't matter how good your intentions are. Intentions are no defence against predatory infiltrators. Good #safeguarding IS. Finally, please take a few minutes to watch this video.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Georgia Cross 🧟‍♀️

Georgia Cross 🧟‍♀️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgiaXCross

Jan 20
Sigh. Quick 🧵

More #safeguarding fails. Please could you watch this video by @claireOT about a discussion in a recent podcast, in which adult sexualities are projected onto pre-school children by adults and #safeguarding red flags are ignored.

@claireOT Here's a thread about the same issues by @TaniaAMarshall. We should *never* place children outside normal #safeguarding frameworks because we are more interested in how we can interpret their behaviours to suit preferred narratives of men with paraphilias.
@claireOT @TaniaAMarshall Finally, please read my own thread about the dangers of infiltration by abusers which all organisations working with children or their parents face and must guard against. If you ignore #safeguarding red flags, such people will see you as an easy mark.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 10, 2021
Minor thought experiment on the idea that destigmatising certain male sexual behaviours - "understanding the poor suffering man better" - is the best strategy and will make something pro-social out of something anti-social.
What if we substitute a different human impulse that is anti-social rather than pro-social? Let's take theft. Some people are covetous. They get really distressed if they can't have the things they want. If they can't buy them, they steal them. Some become kleptomaniacs.
Well, it's sad for the kleptomaniac, isn't it? We live in a materialist society after all. Some people are more vulnerable to it. Some people are even born covetous. They remember those covetous feelings from when they were 3 or 4. They were born that way, poor things.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 29, 2021
You know, the most damning thing about the @UKLabour conference is how ignorant they all are about the women they have been traducing. Few people are highly political in the activist sense and most view those who are, as rather crankish.
@UKLabour But women opposing genderism have been through an intense period of political education in the last five years. They've learned about concepts like regulatory capture and institutional capture and the difference between them. They know about policy laundering.
@UKLabour They know about legislation: how EqA and GRA interact; what the Children Act says and how schools guidance undermines it. They've educated themselves about grooming techniques and the patterns of narcissistic abuse.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 23, 2021
Privacy and single sex services: an analogy of workable policy.
You must be 18 to purchase alcohol in a pub in the UK. This is an age-based safeguard for young people. There are sanctions on pubs who serve under-age customers.
If the pub suspects a customer is under-age, they ask to see an identity document proving age. If the customer does not have one, the pub must refuse service or face those sanctions, which can be significant.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(