So this story is all around the internet, about the prof who hid a clue in his syllabus for someone to find $50. Then he posted it on FB, and predictably, it's gone viral and everyone is gloating about the lazy kids who didn't bother to "read the syllabus." BUT...(thread)
2/ None of these stories actually talk about this supposedly obvious clue, which seems odd, given no one claimed the supposedly easy-to-find cash prize. Instead, it's just a bunch of "students are so lazy and stupid" takes. But here is the actual syllabus (student screenshot):
3/ Almost every institution has common syllabus statements-the policy boilerplate everyone's required to include in their course syllabi. Instructors usually download it from the uni website and append it to the syllabi they've created, often with a heading like "univ policies"
4/ it's the equivalent of the rapidly-talking lawyer voice at the end of a car dealership or pharmaceutical commercial, or the cookies agreement you click on a website before you get to browse. Yeah, it's there, but it's not the "real" part of the document at hand.
5/ so if you want to gloat about students being too stupid to see this in their syllabus, I want you to tell me RIGHT NOW what the terms and conditions disclaimers are on your cell phone plan.
What? You don't remember? You didn't read those? WHY NOT YOU STUPID LAZY GEN Z LOSER
6/ Also, let's look at the actual wording of this syllabus treasure map all the students "missed." Does this look like free money to you? Or a somewhat creepy offer to share a locker? How many people would read this and think "that dude effed up his copy and paste?"7
7/ So the viral story about buffoonish college students is actually...kinda not that at all? It's not an invitation to free money that's RIGHT THERE YOU FOOLS, it's a vaguely-phrased weird flex from a prof who wanted to do a Facebook stunt and look like the Clever Boy.
8/ we're headed towards a third year of pandemic teaching, and *no one's* working with full bandwidth rn. And *this* is where some of y'all want to put your energy? Why? What is it you want to prove, exactly? Because this is weird and dickish, and really just kinda sad tbh. /x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Institutions bend over backwards to protect right-wing white students, but students of color are never extended even the slightest benefit of the doubt.
Every single bit of campus is a teaching and learning space. And @ASU has definitely taught these students something--these Black students have learned whose voices matter at ASU, and whose don't. They've learned who the university welcomes, and who it doesn't.
The Right has done for decades what it accuses the Left of doing: creating narrow limits for speech in order to drum up outrage and grievance, then deploy the resulting pressure to silence their opponents. And university admins fall for it every time (or sympathize with it, tbh)
It's a symbol of fertility and renewal from ancient Egyptian and pagan European rituals later co-opted by 16th century Germans and then 19th century Americans to celebrate a holiday that the early church timed with traditional solstice celebrations as a PR move.
Historians: SUPER FUN AT HOLIDAY PARTIES
Them: wow this mistletoe brings up such great holiday memories
Historians: let us tell you about the role of evergreen plants in ancient near eastern fertility rituals
I am fortunate to have coverage, and I realize that. But enrolling in our new health coverage for the upcoming year and seeing my premium increase, while the deductible doubles too, is pretty frustrating. Functionally, it's a pay cut.
The fact we tie health insurance to employment in this country has always been absolutely bonkers. It's an unsustainable disaster.
I wonder how many folx at small colleges like mine are seeing their institutions "find budget efficiencies" by getting Ford Fiesta type coverage, so they can say they're "preserving salaries" while actually increasing both faculty and staff's out of pocket costs.
Every year at this time we're driving back from my mom's place in PA, and we catch the OSU-Michigan game on the radio, always with the Michigan announcers, because they're just...them. And awesomely so. This year was fun, and a great way to send out Branstetter and Dierdorf.
"JIM. JIM. WE DON'T HAVE A DEFENDER ON HIM OOOHHHHHH NO"
*Incompletion*
"SUCH GOOD COVERAGE ON THAT PLAY JIM"
Branstetter: "TOUCHDOWN, MMMICHIGAN!!!"
Dierdorf: *pounding happily on the desk in the background*
Maybe movements for justice--and the people who comprise them--shouldn't limit themselves to what does well with the centrist white focus groups, despite what the Savvy Analysts™ think.
(Notice all the Savvy Analysts™ are white men. As are all those who QT them approvingly or respond with gushing praise to their "don't let woke politics ruin Democrats' chances" takes. I'm not exaggerating--literally every reply I saw was from a white dude)
"Well, Dr. King, you make some good arguments, but there are key white voter blocs who just aren't comfortable with all this 'social justice wokeness,' so we're gonna have to ask you to cool it with the marching. Also, 'we shall overcome' seems a bit too confrontational..."