When you and your family’s comfy personal future doesn’t depend on how much the massive numbers of poor people in your largely poor and struggling state suffer, or whether we remain a democracy, because you and your family are financially set, you might be @Sen_JoeManchin
When things fall apart there are always the Manchins & Sinemas who’ll let it all burn, believing they’ve built themselves high enough walls and stashed away enough cash & favors that it won’t matter when the wolves come, the soil is soured and the suffering spreads like wildfire.
It wouldn’t surprise me at all if neither of them runs for re-election in 2024. They’re showing all the signs of people who are cashing out, their constituents, party & country be damned. They’ve chosen sides with the super rich against the struggling people in their own states.
We have just one party left that believes in democracy and in helping the poor and struggling. But that doesn’t mean every member of that party cares about those things. In the end, parties morph and change. But right wing oligarchic ideology never does. It eats from both plates.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A brutal open from 1/6 commission chairman @BennieGThompson. Addressing Meadows, Bannon and Clark: “History will be written about these times… and not look upon any of you as a martyr. History will not look upon you as a victim. … 1/
“History will record that in a critical moment in our democracy, most people were on the side of finding the truth… and history will also record, in this critical moment, that some people were not.” 2/
He then addressed Meadows’ seven years in congress including serving as ranking member of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, saying “it’s not hard to locate records of his time in the House and find [him] full of indignation because… 3/
Per the prosecutor, the Crumblys, after having withdrawn $4,000 from the bank, were found by the state’s fugitive apprehension team who searched an abandoned building and found them hiding in a locked room. How do the defense attorneys explain that??
The Crumblys withdrew $4000 and fled. Wouldn’t a $50,000 bond, which the defense is asking for, or frankly any bond at all, be like an open invitation to flee again, given that they already tried to??
Gotta say; of all the things that shook my core this week, Amy Coney Barrett’s cold-blooded calculations about how convenient it would be to cast off a child born via uninvited trauma after nine months of anxiety and psychic horror was provably the most disturbing. Who is she???
I’ve given birth to 3 children; one conceived while I was on birth control. And the story of each pregnancy is an emotional and physical journey. That a woman — a mother — could think the easy way out is to carry and bear a child and just drop it off at a firehouse is horrifying.
And an adoptive mother at that! Does she think her children’s birth mothers gave them up without emotional expense? I honestly can’t get my mind around it. Religious extremism is a hell of a drug, and not one I want deciding the rule of law in my country. wsj.com/articles/amy-c…
An important note: there has LITERALLY NEVER been an American majority that wanted abortion to be illegal. Not when Roe was decided in 1973 and not now. The Republican SCOTUS members & their sponsors at @Heritage & the @GOP are defying the American people. news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abor…
The vast majority of Americans DO NOT WANT to live in Gilead. No matter how desperately Clarence, the beer guy, Scalito, Gorsuch and Amy want them to (who knows what Roberts wants). And we will not relent to it quietly. Women are going to fight back. Bet on it.
Also important to note: first this Court came for the voting rights of Black folks, indigenous people and other people of color. Then they came for Muslims who just wanted to visit their families in America. It's the least surprising thing EVER that they have now come for women.
A few things that stand out to me here… 1. Note that Tuckums admits that the nanny is not named yet he goes on to assumes she’s “non-white,” while also calling her a “servant.” She may be, but HE doesn’t know that. Apparently to Tuckums, all “servants” and nannies are non-white.
Except when they’re not. The late Princess Diana was once a nanny. And also was white, last time I checked. And she was no “servant.” Being a nanny is not some low class servitude. It’s legitimate, responsible work done by mainly women of all races. news.amomama.com/203143-princes…
2. Tucker clearly doesn’t respect that work or it’s responsibilities. I’ve never used in-home childcare, but I’ll bet Tuckums had a FLEET of nannies as a snotty little rich kid and likely uses them now as his… checks notes: “non-white servants.”
Amazing that a handful of arch-conservative religionists on the United States Supreme Court are poised to place the bodies of more than 106 million women, and every woman going forward, into the custody of mostly male legislators in the states… in a “modern” country in 2021.
And they’re doing this over the objections of three-quarters of Americans; who can do nothing about it, as this handful of right wing extremists are permanently endowed with uncheckable power. If that is not a religious dictatorship and ultra-minority rule, I don’t know what is.
The United States is in a deep, deep slide; away from democracy, away from religious ecumenism, and for women in this country: away from bodily autonomy. And the same forces demanding this Talibanism, also demand that Americans open their bodies up to death by guns and COVID.