Thread by @ytengra

1) Lets say govt comes in court & agrees that vax doesnt reduce transmission, but definitely reduces hosp & death. & they argue that since they fine ppl for helmets & seatbelts, they can also fine us if we dont take a vaccine for our own good, or mandate it

#NoVaccineMandates

2) Even then, their argument won't stand due to 3 reasons:
a) helmet & vax analogy cant be compared, as most ppl already are protected due to natural immunity, without having to wear an additional helmet (i.e. vax)

b) Mandating a vax is like mandating a particular brand of helmet. There are many helmets that can reduce spread, hosp & death, like vitamin d, arginine, ivermectin, omega 3 fats, black seeds, nutr. & oxidative therapies, and debatably the vax! So why just mandate the vax?

c) No helmet comes with a risk of causing side effects to the person wearing it, nor does a seatbelt. Covid vaccines are some of the most dangerous vaccines that have ever been invented according to intl safety data, hence there is no comparison between the 2

#NoVaccineMandates