Giles Wilkes Profile picture
Dec 20, 2021 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Quick thread on why I decided to write this:

Challenge yourself by reading Oliver Lewis' praise for his now-departed boss Lord Frost
conservativehome.com/platform/2021/… and you find a link to Frost's lecture from February. Frost makes a particular claim about trade 1/
Attacking the (multiple, almost unanimous) studies saying Brexit makes us poorer, Frost says this, and in particular questions whether the decline in trade will really hurt productivity so badly. 2/
(He calls it "unproven" decline in trade, but the OBR can pretty much refute him - see charts).

Anyway, I have long read that lower trade lowers productivity, and it stands to reason. Trade and comparative advantage, the essence of what the market does - who questions that ? 3/
But it turns out that if you visit the OBR's immediate post-referendum forecasts (the EFO), obr.uk/efo/economic-a… you see a decided ambivalence and caution: 4/
HOWEVER, by last November, the OBR in analysing the risk of an impending No Deal Brexit appears to have abandoned its ambivalence 5/
When we emerge WITH a deal, something for the OBR to get its teeth into, it finds plenty of reason to continue to assume a 4% hit to productivity - notably, the loss of trade in services that will come 6/
When I try to find out what are the theoretical drivers for this, some excellent papers pop out of the footnotes, such as this 2017 one from the World Bank which nailed the likely drop in trade 7/
openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/hand…
and for the COST of that loss in trade, see this from @swatdhingraLSE, Van Reenen and others eprints.lse.ac.uk/66144/1/__lse.… 8/
I have no reason to doubt these findings - nor does Frost, imho. But I don't understand the journey the OBR has been on, from ambivalence and caution to nailed-on certainty. It may have encouraged sceptics?

9/
In my view, Brexit damages productivity for reasons any freemarketeer would struggle to evade. But the state of the literature is not as definitive as I expected to find on setting out, so anyone with anything better, show me! 10/10
PS Frost's complaint about these studies is also weak in pretending they try to "predict the micro-detail". No they don't, and see this tweet

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Giles Wilkes

Giles Wilkes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Gilesyb

Jul 30
Reflection on yesterday's big moment from Reeves: this far, there's a pattern of the new government doing what was widely predicted, but still somehow managing to surprise on the upside in their delivery.

We all expected a "shocked face what a mess" moment...1/
It was visible from a distance that the Tories had set aside far too little spending to keep the public realm in a decent state, let alone deliver goodies like extra hospitals.

But the details, the vitriol and clear accusation of dishonesty were 🔥 2/

wp.me/pDsIG-15c
If the anger wasn't real, she's one helluva actor. The OBR's promised investigation into the circumstances of the last Budget means another big hit from this dishonesty accusation. It might build all summer, that narrative. They want it to land like 1992, like Truss...3/
Read 10 tweets
Jun 19
When I saw that @IPPR (@GeorgeDibb and @carsjung specifically) had written a report eviscerating the UK's investment record, my first reaction was a shrug and "huh, yeah we know that". But it is well worth your time: 1/ ippr-org.files.svdcdn.com/production/Dow…
To start cheekily: it praises the Sunak/criticizes Labour's plans!

"The government’s plans for ‘full expensing’ capital allowances are a step in the right direction"

"a Starmer-led government would cut public investment more than the 2010-24 Conservative administration"
2/
Two: it is salutory to be reminded of how deep-seated is the UK's failure to invest.

If you are looking for culprits behind our growth failures, *you need to find big things*. This is a big one - £1.9tn cummulatively. Had that been invested, GDP would be much higher ... 3/ Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 3
Since there is nothing else going on, here is a good @IPPR report by @GeorgeDibb et al on Manufacturing and the Green transition

Some thoughts: 1/ippr-org.files.svdcdn.com/production/Dow…
They share the Johnsonian Cakeist position that Green Growth is a three-fer - you win at growth, regional balance and environmental policy by going for it.

This would be nice. But: 2/ Image
Others in the think tank ecosystem like @resfoundation with their Ending Stagnation work are more cautious: 3/ economy2030.resolutionfoundation.org/reports/ending…
Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 15
Most of us are reasonably convinced that Truss's economic programme (fwiw) was proven to have failed within a month. The market verdict was brutal.

But most policy isn't that clear.

I read a LOT of centre left pamphlet-speak calling for industrial policy ... 1/
which you could machine-write: "the UK needs a green innovative industrial strategy that invests in sectors of the future and cuts pollution while creating green jobs and rebalancing the economy/levelling up. It should borrow to do this/tax the rich".

What I seldom read... 2/
... is anything like a statement of what failure would look like. Give it 50 times longer than Truss - 5 years, say. What would force you to concede "this hasn't worked"? What metrics would count for evidence? Or is that too short?

Or is it heretical to ask? 3/
Read 9 tweets
Mar 4
The Government has more Industrial Strategy than you can fit on an A2 sheet, a thread. Please tell me what is missing!

An Advanced Manufacturing Plan 1/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65788f51…
Which includes the GIGA fund (Green Industries Growth Accelerator)
2/gov.uk/government/new…
... and also a Life Sciences Innovative Manufacturing Fund 3/gov.uk/government/pub…
Read 33 tweets
Jan 26
"Budget blowouts and delays: why the UK struggles with infrastructure"

OK, this is a vitally important and *difficult* topic, and it plays directly into a subject I've been trying to force myself to think about: when markets or planning are better 1/on.ft.com/3S5WnbK
This observation crudely suggests to me that the UK has opted for the ever-more-market approach to doing stuff. Issue a tender, that gets sub-contracted and so on in an attempt to stimulate competitive dynamics that somehow produce the best outcome. But it hasn't worked! 2/ Image
In my amateur estimation, we've been trying to exploit the insights of Hayek's Use of Knowledge in Society which emphasises the supreme knowledge difficulty of planning. But he understands that the right answer depends on circumstances! 3/ econlib.org/library/Essays…
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(