I still really think it was a huge mistake for the White House and other Democrats to center Manchin so much. They were trying to flatter him with solicitous attention, but the more attention he's gotten, the more of a petulant diva he has become.
Imagine a scenario where the bill was what it was, negotiated among the caucus, but the line to Manchin from the start was "Either you support it and this party does something, or you don't and it doesn't." Deny him the opportunity to spend a year as shadow president.
Instead, what's happened is, the BBB negotiation was conducted in a way where Manchin raised his profile by being obstinate. The more temper tantrums he threw, the more everyone rushed to hear his every whim. Can't cater to that toxic dynamic.
People say "It was inevitable for Manchin to become the focus of this, because he was the 50th vote." But all 50 senators are the 50th vote. Even Sinema hasn't gotten nearly as much attention, despite being, for a long time, regarded as a bigger problem as Manchin.
What's the difference? A lot of it is the self-perpetuating, self-reinforcing conventional wisdom that Manchin is THE critical holdout. That belief, in turn, helped Manchin become the focus of the whole process, rather than just another marginal senator with doubts.
Again, compare Sinema. Does anyone doubt she has a similar capacity to be a diva as Manchin? But instead of rushing to plead with her, Dems were significantly more dismissive. "She'll just have to get with the program" was the attitude. She got concessions, but not to be queen.
I know this kind of talk is considered anti-empirical in an age where everything is reduced to polls and data, but negotiations are in large part about PSYCHOLOGY, and you don't want your counterparty to feel powerful, much less like they become more powerful by flexing on you.
The last thing I'd add is that while I think it's important to think about this, it's not something that can be reversed overnight, at, at this point, at all. The all-consuming focus on Manchin is something that was built up over months and months. You can't undo it with a snap.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In case you want to diagnose what's wrong with the Democratic Party, consider this: 1. The entire agenda of the party appears miserably dead 2. There isn't even a hint of a suggestion among strong partisans that different people should be in charge
Dems make fun of the GOP's slavish devotion to Trump, but the GOP actually has a much better track record of rotating leaders after failure, while Democrats respond to failure by producing ever-more-elaborate excuses for why the same network of people should stay in charge
The problems Democrats are suffering are the problems you see when accountability fails in an institution: buck-passing after failure, leaders so long entrenched that changing them becomes unthinkable, a power structure built around personal loyalty rather than performance
Yes, Dems need every single vote. That means progressive senators are going to have to vote for a bill they can support, but don't love. Why doesn't Manchin also have to compromise in the same way?
This only makes sense if we assume that THE ONLY BILL MANCHIN WILL VOTE FOR is one that MEETS HIS EXACT PREFERENCES, which is possible, but deeply improbable.
Come on guys, if Manchin says "I don't care, I'll walk away right now, final offer," the correct response is "This is the oldest bartering tactic in the known universe," not "Oh my god! Give him everything he wants! We're beaten!" medium.com/@whstancil/the…
Trying to figure out why “Manchin is in charge and we just need to accept it” has become such an incredibly popular take among a certain type of cozy establishment person, and I think it’s because we’re all attracted to explanations of the world that make us comfortable
If you’re doing alright and you’re friends with a lot of important people it’s extremely comforting to think that the things that happen are the things that MUST happen, and no one could have changed anything, and no one is to blame except faceless masses
It’s terrifying to think the world could be better if we made better decisions, and people will go to great lengths to avoid that conclusion
I’ve been a loyal and reliable Democrat for a long time. I’ve seen the party fail a lot. And one thing that is incredibly consistent: every time it fails, a bunch of guys will come busting through the wall Kool-Aid style to say “It’s because they didn’t win enough seats!”
It’s an appealing view I guess because it’s of course it’s usually true. Yes, having a bunch more Senate seats would help Dems do more things, obviously.
But also, we DIDN’T win a bunch more Senate seats. We have to think about passing laws in 50/50 Senate.
It’s also obviously true that, given a certain congressional makeup, all outcomes are not identical! There are good ways to negotiate and bad ways to do it.
The White House is politically too cowardly to take aggressive measures against omicron, and has rationalized that decision by deciding that it's okay to let omicron rip through the population unchecked because vaccinated people are (probably) going to survive an infection.
Not only does this decision endanger the lives of millions of Americans simply because they have made one terrible decision, it is also impossible that it won't impose huge costs on the vaccinated as well, whose hospitals, cities, and workplaces will be ravaged all the same.
And of course, many people CAN'T be vaccinated, because they're too young. And many people, including those young children, depend on parents or family members who aren't vaccinated, completely outside their control.
I know it was all the way back in November, but remember that Pelosi was APPLAUDED for breaking the progressive blockade of BIF using the Congressional Black Caucus as her sockpuppet.
Of course everyone at the time had all the information they needed to understand that this would place BBB on life support, but just kind of goaded each other into thinking it would work out. "What's the worst that could happen? We have Biden's assurance, do you not trust him??"
I think that's the maddening thing here. It's not a failure of prediction, but willpower: people who swore they'd NEVER untether BIF from BBB started feeling a little heat, and immediately decided they could take the path of least resistance and the problem would solve itself.