Joe Biden, who has been around the Senate since Methuselah had his baby teeth, clearly thinks that Manchin is no longer negotiating in good faith. Perhaps he's wrong, but it's certainly not a judgment inconsistent with the publicly known facts
I agree as far as it goes with the "prioritize and do fewer programs better" approach, but it only works if you *try to work within the consensus of the party.* Simultaneously demanding prioritization and insisting on priority for your own idiosyncratic preferences won't work
Personally, if I were trying to negotiate a deal in good faith I would simply not suddenly show up on Rupert Murdoch's grievance merchant apparatus to announce that I was no longer open to negotiating
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you haven't seen it, this is the anodyne statement from Biden Manchin is using as a pretext for his sudden trip to trash the bill on Fox News. whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Do Manchin's actions seem like those of someone sincerely interested in making a deal, or someone who was stringing people along Olympia Snowe-style? I think the question answers itself. 🤷♂️
Also, a LOT of red-state Dems -- some of whom, unlike Biden, were actually up in the next cycle! -- voted for the Affordable Care Act. His opposition to the BBBA isn't determined by geography. Doug Jones would not be doing this.
It is simultaneously true that Manchin has the highest electoral WAR among Dem senators and that he should be criticized for both opposing BBBA and being twerpish throughout the negotiations. (Also note that the second-highest WAR is Sherrod Brown.)
It would be one thing if progressives in the caucus presented him with a take-it-or-leave-it $5T package. The left of the party has negotiated responsibly, only to be met with endless goalpost-moving and incoherent explanations, along with attacks on the party in GOP outlets
LBJ couldn't get a Supreme Court nominee confirmed with a 64-36 majority. He exploited a historic opportunity in 1965 well but he wasn't some magician who could have gotten the Great Society out of a 50/50 Senate lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/12/nostal…
A lot of the nostalgia for LBJ’s hardball tactics specifically is "hiring Urban Meyer to coach in the NFL" logic. Senators in 2021 would respond about as well to The Treatment as Jags players did to being assaulted and called dipshits
Manchin and Sinema are not in fact going to suddenly embrace Biden’s entire agenda because Biden makes them watch him take a shit or invades their private space or wears them down over 8 Cutty-and-sodas
Trump was one vote way from repealing the ACA, and kicked trans people out of the military. Plus claiming GOP has "moved left" requires you to ignore stuff like Republican judges nullifying the Voting Rights Act and being about to rule much of the modern regulatory state illegal
One reason government-by-judiciary will be scarily effective is the tendency of pundits/reporters not to cite policy changes announced by the judiciary as belonging to the party that has engaged in a decades-long quest to install a judiciary that would achieve these policy goals
Seems like Trump's judges being about to vote to overrule a very popular 50-year-old precedent so states can create abortion criminalization regimes more barbaric than the ones that existed pre-Roe is pretty relevant here
I really don't understand how at this late date people can think that pointing out Republicans are procedural hypocrites one more time is some kind of political superweapon slate.com/news-and-polit…
What if Mitch McConnell were to deny a hearing to a Democratic Supreme Court nomination in an election year and then confirm a Republican one in October of an election year, the gig would really be up then!
"If we reform the courts, I'm afraid presidential candidates will do what they are already very famously and prominently doing" am I losing my goddamned mind here?
A Donald Trump who didn't promise very specific Supreme Court nominees who would produce very specific policy results almost certainly wouldn't be president! It's amazing to discuss this as a parade-of-horribles hypothetical vox.com/2018/6/29/1751…