Manchin blew up negotiations out of the blue on the opposition's toxic propaganda network!
Joe Biden, who has been around the Senate since Methuselah had his baby teeth, clearly thinks that Manchin is no longer negotiating in good faith. Perhaps he's wrong, but it's certainly not a judgment inconsistent with the publicly known facts
I agree as far as it goes with the "prioritize and do fewer programs better" approach, but it only works if you *try to work within the consensus of the party.* Simultaneously demanding prioritization and insisting on priority for your own idiosyncratic preferences won't work
Personally, if I were trying to negotiate a deal in good faith I would simply not suddenly show up on Rupert Murdoch's grievance merchant apparatus to announce that I was no longer open to negotiating

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Lemieux

Scott Lemieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LemieuxLGM

20 Dec
The “I am negotiating in good faith” banner on my yacht has many people asking questions already answered by my banner lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/12/the-i-…
If you haven't seen it, this is the anodyne statement from Biden Manchin is using as a pretext for his sudden trip to trash the bill on Fox News. whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Do Manchin's actions seem like those of someone sincerely interested in making a deal, or someone who was stringing people along Olympia Snowe-style? I think the question answers itself. 🤷‍♂️
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec
Also, a LOT of red-state Dems -- some of whom, unlike Biden, were actually up in the next cycle! -- voted for the Affordable Care Act. His opposition to the BBBA isn't determined by geography. Doug Jones would not be doing this.
It is simultaneously true that Manchin has the highest electoral WAR among Dem senators and that he should be criticized for both opposing BBBA and being twerpish throughout the negotiations. (Also note that the second-highest WAR is Sherrod Brown.)
It would be one thing if progressives in the caucus presented him with a take-it-or-leave-it $5T package. The left of the party has negotiated responsibly, only to be met with endless goalpost-moving and incoherent explanations, along with attacks on the party in GOP outlets
Read 6 tweets
19 Dec
LBJ couldn't get a Supreme Court nominee confirmed with a 64-36 majority. He exploited a historic opportunity in 1965 well but he wasn't some magician who could have gotten the Great Society out of a 50/50 Senate lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/12/nostal…
A lot of the nostalgia for LBJ’s hardball tactics specifically is "hiring Urban Meyer to coach in the NFL" logic. Senators in 2021 would respond about as well to The Treatment as Jags players did to being assaulted and called dipshits
Manchin and Sinema are not in fact going to suddenly embrace Biden’s entire agenda because Biden makes them watch him take a shit or invades their private space or wears them down over 8 Cutty-and-sodas
Read 5 tweets
18 Dec
Trump was one vote way from repealing the ACA, and kicked trans people out of the military. Plus claiming GOP has "moved left" requires you to ignore stuff like Republican judges nullifying the Voting Rights Act and being about to rule much of the modern regulatory state illegal
One reason government-by-judiciary will be scarily effective is the tendency of pundits/reporters not to cite policy changes announced by the judiciary as belonging to the party that has engaged in a decades-long quest to install a judiciary that would achieve these policy goals
Seems like Trump's judges being about to vote to overrule a very popular 50-year-old precedent so states can create abortion criminalization regimes more barbaric than the ones that existed pre-Roe is pretty relevant here
Read 4 tweets
16 Dec
I really don't understand how at this late date people can think that pointing out Republicans are procedural hypocrites one more time is some kind of political superweapon slate.com/news-and-polit…
What if Mitch McConnell were to deny a hearing to a Democratic Supreme Court nomination in an election year and then confirm a Republican one in October of an election year, the gig would really be up then!
Read 5 tweets
15 Dec
The hopeless incoherence of opposition to expanding the Supreme Court lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/12/the-ho…
"If we reform the courts, I'm afraid presidential candidates will do what they are already very famously and prominently doing" am I losing my goddamned mind here?
A Donald Trump who didn't promise very specific Supreme Court nominees who would produce very specific policy results almost certainly wouldn't be president! It's amazing to discuss this as a parade-of-horribles hypothetical vox.com/2018/6/29/1751…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(