2/Bear in mind that our work considered Housing First with “eyes open” as I had raised relevant questions as to what it can deliver, most especially where addiction is part of the picture pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19523126/
3/However, on whole and despite the very real challenges that will happen when housing people with serious mental illness and addiction challenge, the data have been reassuring as to potential for success, like this pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21285095/
4/The actual work by case management staff to get a person into a unit is serious, demanding, and logistically hard because of the rental market and bureaucracy ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.11…
5/We interviewed ~ 170 VA personnel in 8 VA med centers to assess fidelity to the Housing First model 2012-14: high fidelity for emphasis on permanent housing without precondition, less so for harm reduction, middling for strength of supportive services - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28481597/
6/Like any and every complex organizational undertaking, Housing First can be done well or less so. We found the best fidelity to Housing First when the leadership, middle management and the VA medical center as a whole aligned efforts: link.springer.com/article/10.100…
7/I have seen egregious attempts to argue that the approach used by VA actually did not work.
Please look at the graph.
Any large piece of work can be done well or poorly. That is why we take it seriously.
But don’t ignore results! /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/There is one upcoming Supreme Court Case to follow for anyone who cares about criminal prosecutions of doctors for prescriptions of opioid medicine - specifically Rx where intentions were to deliver appropriate medical care: Ruan v. USA supremecourt.gov/docket/docketf…
2/The central question comes down to whether it is a federal crime for a physician to prescribe opioids, in a way where the government’s experts contend it was imprudent or unwise, when that physician intended and reasonably believed they were acting within standard of care
3/Most prosecutions of non-MDs under the Controlled Substance Act require “mens rea” criminal intent.
If I sell you a PlayStation, believing it is a PlayStation, which turns out to have cocaine inside, I can’t be convicted of a criminal violation of CSA. No criminal intent
1/It is helpful to see a review of the concerns raised by professionals & patients prior to the publication of the 2016 CDC Opioid Prescribing Guideline - take a look. I will add highlights from my 2016 docket submission. Nearly all issues re-emerged in published research
2/ CDC’s Dose-related recommendations prioritized *relative* risk over *absolute* risk, and minimized consideration of interaction of risk and protective factors -
This is different from approaches applied to nearly all other risk evaluations in medicine (eg NSTEMI, A-fib)
2/Our team at @UABNews has been running a preliminary version of a larger planned study, a survey to reach family survivors to learn about these tragedies one by one, like safety investigators would an airplane crash. We think that is the place to start. It is called CSI:OPIOIDs
3/As a clinician, I have been advocating to address these losses since 2016.
In 2018, I began urging federal study of the individual suicides, because large database statistics, concerning as they are, don’t reveal the circumstances around losses. We have to look closely.
@Jinxthejjinx@ChadDKollas@OregonAdvocate@PainMedJournal@LabGirl_Chloe@supportprop 1/I see this paper as direct, and not one that is terribly supportive of tapering policies (and it's good to report this): it's clear from this report that taper often fails, and that switch to buprenorphine helps some, and at least as often fails with others.
@Jinxthejjinx@ChadDKollas@OregonAdvocate@PainMedJournal@LabGirl_Chloe@supportprop 3/Here it says that among the subset of 89 who got all the way below 90 MME, the majority (52%) had ⬆️ of pain, but 24% had no change and 24% had ⬇️ of pain. This means that taper may help some pain, but more often it does the opposite. That's the data.
1/This is a sobering, important article, with devastating observations from a formerly homeless Veteran. Mailing medication to someone who is homeless? Yikes.
2/Our research finds that persons who are homeless, Veteran or not, are often subject to misunderstanding or stigma, and that aspirations for what makes care good are not interchangeable with mainstream concepts - @AllysonVarleyjournals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
3/In large VA-funded research studies. we find that intentional efforts to tailor the design & delivery of primary care for persons experiencing homelessness, prevents unfavorable experiences in care! journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcar…
1/Listening to @1a "Against the Pain" - @1a is to be commented for covering this issue Hats off.
I wish to share a thought on a form of bias built into NARXCare as it is obvious, correctable, and harms patients. wamu.org/story/21/11/11…
2/Dr. Nishi Rawat of Bamboo Health (provider of the NARXCare algorithm to assess overdose risk) describes the NARXCare product they put onto the screens of doctors (via Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs) as an "objective summary". About that...
3/Dr. Rawat's definition of NARXCare covers 2 distinct function. One is a graphic summary of the Rx's received by a patient (if the data are accurate, this is helpful).
But the concerning one is an "Overdose Risk Score"