How many more more accounts of dying patients saying "I wish I'd had the vaccine" will we have to read?
Those who make misleading claims about covid vaccines being dangerous or unnecessary, and persuade others that this is true, are killing people.
We recognise that there are limits to free speech: almost everyone agrees that we should not be free to shout “fire!” in a crowded theatre, because it is likely to kill people. Surely spreading false claims that discourage people from getting vaccinated is the equivalent?
I believe that, where there is an obvious conflict between them, it is right to strike a balance between free speech and the preservation of human life. I explore the question here: theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
There's also a chain of consequence. Because so many unvaxxed people are falling ill and require hospital treatment, people with other conditions get bumped down the waiting list, and they too might die as treatment is delayed. Anti-vax misinformation endangers many lives.
Incidentally, I don't agree with some people's suggestions of charging unvaxxed people for their care, shunting them to the bottom of the waiting list or even refusing them treatment. Healthcare should be universal, free, and allocated on the basis of need.
Many of those falling ill have been conned by cynical liars seeking to increase their YouTube following and boost their status. I see unvaxxed patients as victims of these lies. It's the lying that should be curbed.
I think it would be useful for everyone who is claiming that vaccines are more dangerous than the virus to watch this report. It's about an evangelical broadcaster who spread outrageous lies about vaccines and the pandemic - and then died of Covid-19. nbcnews.com/news/us-news/m…
And, of course, while so many people are fretting about losing their freedom to catch Covid-19, massive and crucial freedoms are being taken away from us.
It's time we focused and prioritised.
I’ve seen some disturbing things in my time, but the howling silence in most of the UK media about the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, whose measures include stifling protest and legislative cleansing of Gypsies, Roma and Travellers, is close to the top of the list.
We’ve all had the fantasy, right? About what we'd do if politicians here attacked democracy, seized dictatorial powers and introduced special laws against minorities? How brave and noble we are in these dreams! Now it happens, and we clear our throats and look the other way.
If you ever wondered how dictators come to power, this is how: through resistance melting away like summer snow, as journalists and other public figures suddenly discover they're late for an urgent appointment about something-or-other. Sorry, must dash! Toodle-pip.
The sheer hypocrisy of these people, who are simultaneously pushing through a "papers please" clause (compulsory voter ID) that could disenfranchise 2 million people.
Not to prevent a virus from spreading, but to prevent the Conservatives from losing office.
The same "papers please" Conservatives have just voted for a measure (in the Nationality and Borders Bill) that could arbitrarily deprive 5 million people of their passports.
The Conservatives are now driving a measure through Parliament, without debate in the Commons, that will ban named people from attending protests, or even mentioning protests on social media, and force them to surrender themselves to police stations at the state's pleasure.
How can we tell that the cleansing of Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities (#GRT) in the Police Bill has nothing to do with law & order and everything to do with prejudice? Because if the govt cared about law & order in the countryside, it would have other priorities:
Thread/
1. The mass illegal dumping and burning of waste by organised criminal syndicates, causing an environmental catastrophe. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
2. The mass dumping of farm manure and raw human sewage in rivers, causing another environmental catastrophe. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
The more I learn about complex systems, the less likely it seems that the current, incremental approach to climate mitigation could work. It's as if, during the financial emergency in 2008, governments had said "we'll supply the bailout money at 2% a year between now and 2050".
The financial sector would have collapsed many years before the rescue package was complete. To push the system back into a stable equilibrium state before it reached its tipping point, governments had to act immediately and decisively.
We don't know how close Earth systems are to their tipping points, but some of them could be very close. If these systems are approaching their critical thresholds, the only relevant action is sudden and drastic.
It's happening in front of our eyes: the stifling of democracy in the UK, with even more dictator's powers being slipped into the Police Bill. Yet the entire Establishment looks the other way. We must fight this as if our lives depend on it. They might. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Parliament should be in uproar. The press should be in uproar. Yet you could hear a pin drop. There have been roughly as many stories in the UK press about Nestlé’s Quality Street chocolates as there have been about this massive attack on democratic rights.
Opposition is left to a few peers in the House of Lords, Liberty, alternative news sites and protesters coming together under the #KillTheBill banner. There’s a demonstration in London this afternoon:
I’ve just finished my book Regenesis*: feeding the world without devouring the planet. I followed some astonishing people, read over 5000 papers, and questioned everything I believed to be true. The results, I think, are revolutionary. Published by @PenguinUKBooks in May.
Thread/
I hope this book transforms our relationship with what we eat and with the living planet. What I’ve stumbled across has radically changed my understanding of our crisis and the possible solutions. We’ve made some terrible mistakes, but there are also some wonderful opportunities.
I don’t want to get my hopes up, or yours, as they might be wrong. But two of the expert reviewers who read it for me used the exact same words: “the Silent Spring of the 21st Century”.