THREAD ScotGov has made a real mess of trying to regulate short-term lets. Since launching the Homes First campaign over 4 years ago, it is clear what needs to be done in principle. There are 2 elements to regulation. The 1st is planning reform and the 2nd is licensing. 1/11
The first (planning) determines whether a property can be used as a short-term let and application will be assessed (as all planning applications are) against planning law and the policies of the planning authority. 2/11
The second is licensing. A licensing scheme ensures that operators are fit and proper persons, have the requisite insurance and safety checks. Crucially, a license application can demonstrate whether the applicant has planning consent (a critical check). 3/11
Planning reforms were implemented via s.17 of the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019. Instead of a requirement that STLs are a change of use & must seek planning consent in all cases, The SNP/Tories cooked up Short Term Left Control Areas in which planning consent must be sought. 4/11
However, Short term Left Control Areas cannot be designated without Ministerial permission - a flagrant violation of the principle of subsidiarity. Thats why, when the regulations implementing this measure were introduced, I opposed them. 5/11 theyworkforyou.com/sp/?id=2021-02…
The Regulations implemented eating a licensing scheme were withdrawn by Ministers after much criticism including that they caught within their scope traditional bed and breakfast businesses - a move that was disproportionate and unnecessary. 6/11
Amended regulations were introduced a few months ago and the LocalGov Committee completed taking oral evidence on them 2day. They remain problematic, over-prescriptive & powers for local authorities to refuse licences on the basis of over-provision have been removed by Govt. 7/11
It remains to be seen what happens next but I expect them to be pushed through Parliament by SNP and Greens. The fundamental problem all along has been twofold. 8/11
Firstly, the Govt has been far too close to transnational corporations such as AirBnB and the need to have effective regulation has been sidelined by the desire to appease powerful lobby groups. 9/11
2ndly (& most fundamentally), ScotGov has consistently sought to control the regulatory process instead of providing councils with a simple framework of planning & licensing & let them decide how to implement it in their areas. 10/11
Councils should be empowered.. Edinburgh could clamp down hard in the residential city centre whereas Highland could target policies at rural hotspots and ensure that traditional self-catering and B&Bs are subject to light-touch licensing. Regrettably this hasn't happened. 11/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andy Wightman

Andy Wightman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andywightman

6 Oct
Can I attempt to give a practical example of what today’s Supreme Court ruling means. Both Bills incorporate international treaties and provide judicial remedies where a Court finds that any provision of the UN or CoE treaties have been violated. 1/5
So, for example, if a local authority were to consider that a decision by Scottish Ministers violated an Article of the European Charter, it could launch a judicial review of that decision. 2/5
As passed, the Bill provides that courts could find in favour of the authority & issue a declaration of incompatibility. This could be made under the Bill as passed provided that the matter complained of is a devolved matter (irrespective of whether a UK or a SP statute) 3/5
Read 6 tweets
6 Oct
Disappointed but not surprised by the Supreme Court ruling on my European Charter of Local Self-Government (Incorporation) (Scotland Bill. 1/7 supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-202…
The question before the court was not about the merits of the Bill but about whether its provisions modifed s28(7) of the Scotland Act 1998 and on the proper application of s 101(2) of the Scotland Act 1998. 2/7
In short the Bill provided for limits to be placed on existing legislation where it breached the European Charter. The limits would only apply to devolved matters but (importantly) would apply to UK laws on devolved matters 3/7
Read 7 tweets
28 Jul
1/7 This is an important & timely investigation into a bizarre and opaque parliamentary procedure that badly needs reform. Under Rule 9.11 of SAP standing Orders, no Bill can be debated at Stage 3 unless Queens Consent (QC) has (if needed) been obtained. theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/j…
2/7 QC is an effective veto by the Monarch on any legislation affecting the prerogative or the hereditary revenues of the Crown or (& this is bizarre bit) the personal property or personal interests of the Crown (in reality, the personal property of the Queen such as Balmoral.
3/7 So as part of formal legislative process, Queen & the Prince & Steward of Scotland have opportunity to influence legislation in order to protect their personal interests. There is no justification for this. But it is mandated by Scotland Act and thus a longer term challenge.
Read 7 tweets
18 Feb
THREAD - Neil Bibby MSP introduced the Tied Pubs (Scotland) Bill to Parliament to give greater protections to the tenants of Tied Pubs. The Bill was controversial with opinion sharply divided between the interests of tenants and landlords. 1/8
The @SP_Economy Committee recommended that Parliament reject the Bill at Stage 1. Only @RhodaGrant and myself dissented and recommended the Bill be supported. 2/8
At Stage 1, Parliament rejected the Committee’s recommendation and passed the Bill at Stage 1 in November with 107 MSPs voting Yes, none voting No and 4 abstentions. 3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(