THREAD on cases, hospital admissions and why so many scientists & NHS leaders are worried.
Case study of London - and what is behind the alarm!
1/10
The key bit is that it takes about 10-14 days from infection to needing hospital. And if you have symptoms, you'll probably test positive 4-7 days into infection.
So there's roughly a week from testing positive to becoming a hospital admission. 2/10
So - cases in London have risen *very steeply* - but *mainly* in the last week. And only in the most recent week has Omicron been dominant.
But cases to 19 Dec (incomplete!) are already more than double previous week. 3/10
If we look at Covid hospital admissions to London up to 19 Dec we see a more modest rise - but that's largely because they do *not* reflect last week's high numbers - it's too soon! 4/10
If we line up admissions under cases a week earlier we can see they've been very consistently about 2% of confirmed cases. From now on, most admissions will be Omicron.
*If* it's not any milder, then that 2% ratio should keep holding. 5/10
Now - in fact most cases in week to 19 Dec have been younger adults. So let's reduce hospitalisations a bit to 1.5% (note, might still be too high). But even that still leads to a large jump *next week*. 6/10
And there'll be much more intergenerational mixing over Christmas. What happens to cases then? Esp with Omicron now dominant?
And admissions the first week of January? Will they double again? more? 7/10
If weekly admissions double just *twice* more from w/e 19 Dec (1.5K), we are back at last January peak in London (6K). We're likely to get a chunk to 1st double next week.
What is scaring people is that with Christmas mixing there is no real reason to think they won't go⬆️ 8/10
Omicron would have to be a *lot* milder to change this. Older adults more likely to need hospital have been boosted for a while - their boosters won't change hospitalisations over next few weeks.
Cases in London already going up in older adults. 9/10
So we've seen cases sky rocket in London this week. We know that they are likely to spread to older adults more over Christmas. Admissions will follow.
Hospitals already struggling with staff who have covid & rest are exhausted.
NHS is sounding the alarm for good reason. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The pandemic is as bad as it ever was for babies - in year to Aug 2023, 6,300 babies under 1 were admitted to hospital wholly or partly BECAUSE of Covid.
They are ONLY age group where admissions have NOT gone down over time 1/17
Our study, led by Prof @katebrown220, looked at all hospitalisations in England in children with a Covid diagnosis or positive test from Aug 2020-Aug 2023.
We then *excluded* all admissions where a Covid diagnosis was incidental (ie not why they were in hospital)
2/17
Infants (babies under 1) are generally at higher risk from respiratory infections, plus they are the age group that, if infected, are overwhelmingly meeting the virus for the first time.
They are not vaccinated and have not had it before. 3/17
Prof @Kevin_Fong giving the most devastating and moving testimony to the Covid Inquiry of visiting hospital intensive care units at the height of the second wave in late Dec 2020.
The unimaginable scale of death, the trauma, the loss of hope.
Please watch this 2min clip.
And here he breaks down while explaining the absolute trauma experienced by smaller hospitals in particular - the "healthier" ICU patients were transferred out, leaving them coping with so much death.
They felt so alone.
Here Prof Fong explains how every nurse he met was traumatised by watching patients die, being only able to hold up ipads to their relatives and how it went against their normal practice of trying to ensure a dignified death, with family there.
🧵War causes direct civilian deaths but also indirect deaths over the following years.
Recent paper estimates eventual total direct & indirect deaths in Gaza attributable to the war - 10% of entire pop'n.
I want to explain these estimates and why deaths must be counted. 1/13
Why count casualties from war anyway? For moral, legal and strategic reasons.
1 - owe it to those who have died
2 - International law says must count & identify dead as far as possible
3 - monitor progress of war & learn from tactics
2/13
There are direct and indirect casualties of war. Direct deaths include those who killed by fighting or bombs.
Indirect deaths are those that die when they would otherwise have lived because of one or more of: lack of food, healthcare, housing, sanitation, income, hope. 3/13
THREAD: the summer Covid wave in the UK continues.
Basically, there is a LOT of Covid around and not a lot of other respiratory viruses.
If you have cold or flu symptoms, it's probably Covid.
The latest hospital data from England shows steady, quite high levels. 1/8
But admissions don't tell us how much virus is circulating more generally. The best (but imperfect) measure we have is wasterwater measurements, and only in Scotland and not England.
Scotland's wastewater is showing a huge July peak - highest since Omicron's 1st yr in 2022 2/8
Because different people shed different amounts of virus and variants can matter too, you can't for sure infer how many people were infected between different wasterwater peaks. BUT given the size, I'd say it's pretty likely this is the largest peak since 2022 in Scotland 3/8