Liquidity vs volume 101 - in my flow 101 I talked about forced selling/inelastic flow. Selling at any price. That inelastic flow tends to have a large impact on price. I want to talk about volume in this context. My view of normal conditions in markets is that supply and demand
Are both highly elastic for around last sale. This creates the conditions necessary for tons of volume. However I think when a large inelastic player enters the market it overwhelms the local elasticity and pushes into a portion of the elasticity curve that is much less elastic.
Of course at some price change extremely high elasticity returns. So conceptually something like this
I've seen practical examples of this effect when pricing large bought deals of secondary stock offerings. Huge local volume stock has a large dead zone of demand as price moves without true long term investors seeing the move. They then step in.
Think about liquidity providers when working through this concept. Tons of capital at the last sale. But when that sizable capital is chewed through the next tier wakes up. But slowly. And the next tier after that. Finally the long term holder.
It's possible that the curve has more steep sections and more flat sections along the way. And I could be totally wrong and there are infinite steep and flat making the curve classically concave. But I think it is S shaped.
Also I want to differentiate between liquidity related changes in price and changes in the equilibrium price based on changes in information. Obviously all of this is going on at the same time. Furthermore these elasticity curves are not stable through time.
However if you are with me on the S shape nature you can see how an asset with tremendous volume generated by steep local elasticity may actually be fairly illiquid when faced with an inelastic seller.
Volume is one measure. It can be very high if local elasticity and temporary liquidity provided by market makers is high. Elasticity can be extremely flat or even negative once that demand is chewed through. Eventually long term holders steepen the elasticity again. Estimating
This elasticity curve is table stakes for every large asset manager who may in the future need to move a large block of an asset. They do it by measuring every large trade they do. If they are big enough they have a ton of info on the shape. Tables stakes and well understood
Btw ignore the axis. It's the shape that matters
Thanks for the RT
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Us naive Americans dont think about currency returns as part of our portfolios as we have the biggest and for decades best place to invest in equities.
Every other global investor cares about currency returns at basic level for their investing
The basic idea for investors or all nationalities should be simple and obvious to all. But we Americans just haven't had to care. Maybe we still don't but at least we should be aware. This 101 will explain what is obvious to all non Americans and then show how it works
The goal of all investors is simple. We want to maximize the risk adjusted return of our investments in the currency we expect to spend in the future.
As Americans we want to maximize our USD returns
If we are Japanese we want to maximize our Yen returns
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101 part 2.
Role of Repo.
In the prior thread I outline credit creation which can happen without banks and money creation which requires banks.
I also hinted at bank reserves role as being one of grease to the
system and NOT necessary for bank money creation but necessary for interbank deposit shifts. I also didn't discuss base money creation from the Fed and won't be dealing with that in this thread either.
Here I will discuss the specific role of Repo in today's financial system
The big takeaway is it is one of many important and necessary means of credit creation AND it has no role in money creation unless a bank is a party to the transaction.
That will take some weedy mechanics to prove. But before we do that let's talk about the entire economy
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101
There has been a lot of focus on the repo market lately. I get it. It's an important part of the capital markets in the credit creation process. But its growth and contraction is part of the credit creation process
The repo market where transactions are between hedge funds and money market investors, and those who desire leverage for whatever purpose is an important market in the credit creation process BUT is not part of the money creation process UNLESS a commercial bank or the Fed is
A party to the transaction. Because this is largely misunderstood by even some plumbing experts it's worth it for me to write out my understanding (maybe im wrong which would be awesome so I can learn). So here I go.
I've been studying various versions of balance sheet expansions over my career. I'd classify them as
Japanese first failed effort
UK's version
U.S. Version 1
U.S. version 2
ECB version
Japanese all in version 2
They are all fairly different in approach. The big takeaway 🧵
The developing Fed version that most are excited about is most akin to the Japanese first failed effort.
Here's a rough summary of each
In 2001-2006 Japan the BOJ initiated QE. In their version they offered significant lending to the Japanese banking system for good collateral
The balance sheet doubled in size at a pace of 35 Tn yen per year. However of that 35tn only 5 was direct asset purchase and most of that was Japanese Tbills. This is very similar to the BTFP program from SVB time and the current SRF. It was also sorta similar to ECB LTRO
Why do repo rates change and what do they have to do with reserves. This is a super technical issue and there are better folks to follow on this topic than me but I'll give it a go.
Firstly what are the two sides of a repo transaction and why do they want to interact.
One side is a guy with a bank deposit he wants to earn interest on. The other is a guy who wants to borrow money overnight and has assets he owns that he is willing to provide as collateral to the loan. We can go down a level on each side but for now let's keep it simple.
Most repo transactions are done with UST as the collateral and most UST collatarel used is TBills but. UST's are also highly common collateral but do to the marked to market risk they offer less borrowing capacity per unit of notional (higher haircut)
Some thoughts on 10 year notes since Powell guided for a restart of the cutting cycle at Jackson Hole. Trying to answer what the bond market is saying
Nominal yields have fallen 33bp
Note yields are driven lower by
1)Falling real GDP expectations
2)Falling Inflation expectations 3) Falling "risk" of owning assets 4) Improving supply/demand balance vs expectations.
In attributing nominal yield changes to these 4 things unfortunately market prices don't
Easily demonstrate these things. For instance 3&4 are only able to be measured via a model which estimates risk premiums or the expected return over holding cash
Even Breakeven inflation and real TIPS yields have risk premium buried in there market yields. However we can try