Great chat with @jjcouey
I have some errors to confess to as I spoke to fast.
1)I was enrolled in a PhD program at UW but dropped out to focus on my job when the HGP starting racing with Craig Venter. So No PhD.
3)The vaccines have N1-Methyl Pseudouridine and I shouldn't shorthand this to Pseudouridine as the former has less wobble than the latter. N1-Methyl does alter the Tm and increase base stacking in RNA but its methyl group steals one potential H-bond.
There are Peudouridine synthases which convert U->PseudoU. There are N1-methyltransferase genes that convert Pseudo->N1-methylPseudo. This base methylation is a natural signaling system that likely has never seen a fully methylated mRNA before. Natural methylation is usually 1-2%
This is the regulatory document which identifies many smears. Just search this document for "frag" and you will find very interesting discussions. ema.europa.eu/en/documents/a…
More on N1-methyl pseudouridine and Ribosomal Pausing. This has been shown to alter the protein folding of Spike proteins. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…
More on Ribosomal Pausing -
Postnikova et al. mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/1…
The unmodified mRNA provides mostly 1 band. Add in N1-methyl Pseudouridine and you get bright banding patterns and pause sites. There is no 6X His Tag to purify the full length proteins so all of these get injected.
While pseudU has one more hydrogen donor than N1 methylpseudoU, the methyl group compensates with better base stacking and an equal shift in Tm.
Not clear what this does to translation fidelity in light of the bad wrap with pseudoU and the gel smears in regulatory docs.
Just the addition of 4 pseudo’s jumps the Tm 9C.
Imagine all of spike.
It is well known from BioNtech (Lenk et al) and Sutton et al (1997) that RNA:DNA hybrids inhibit DNaseI.
What is less known is that Quadruplex Gs also inhibit DNaseI. Some exist in SV40 and we get the most signal from this qPCR amplicon.
2 Different mechanisms of DNaseI inhibition = plasmid fragmentation cannot be assumed to be uniform in the mRNA vaccines. Hence 100 fold more spike than parts of the vector.
Below is a map of the codon optimized spike where Quadruplex Gs are overlaid with GAA repeats. GAA's are stickier RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our qPCR primers are overlayed as well.
@RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @TracyBethHoeg @DrJBhattacharya
Evans et al demonstrate DNaseI is resistant to quadruplex Gs. They also move to alternative enzymes. nature.com/articles/s4152…
This is from Lenk et al (BioNtech).
Note the concern over GAA sequences and RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our spike qPCR primers happen to land on GAA rich and quadruplex G rich regions of Spike. frontiersin.org/journals/molec…
@LocasaleLab I find the RNAi worship incongruent will how that entire field was ignored when injecting billions of people with mRNAs.
There are multiple 21bp homologies to human that emerged from the haphazard codon optimizations in the modRNA vaccine and no one cared?
@LocasaleLab Receipts.
Take Pfizers vax Sequence and run it through BLAT.
Hello... anyone from the RNAi space want to speak up about this?
On Veterans Day @CharlesRixey @JesslovesMJK
Stopped by MGC.
2 long days later we had all of his data.
It’s now published in The Journal of Independent Medicine.
It describes the mechanism of failure for the DNA contamination in the mRNA shots and why the regulators are missing it.
@JesslovesMJK @CharlesRixey @weldeiry @KUPERWASSERLAB @RetsefL @DrJBhattacharya @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @TracyBethHoeg
Another Achs et al Fumble uncovered.
These folks don't even understand Capillary Electrophoresis.
Its becoming increasingly clear these are not honest mistakes but designed to deceive by people who are employed at a Vaccine Research Institute.
Science for Sale.
@JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher
Here is the Rub.
They used a CE instrument that has a lower limit of sensitivity above the 10ng limit.
You need to be able to pick up 10X below the 10ng limit. Or 33pg/ul (300ul dose @ 10ng = 33pg/ul)
This is embarrassingly rigged or they are incompetent.
They ignored our comments on the preprint server and raced their paper into @Nature.
@JesslovesMJK and @DJSpeicher have their own substacks picking up other errors in this paper I'll post sortly.