A lot of the time, I'd rather read a well-argued thread than an essay or op-ed. Given the amount of info we have to consume daily, I find threads much more to-the-point (and if done well, comprehensive). I'm starting to dislike articles, even when not meandering. Anyone else?
Actually let me make this a poll. For your daily information, would you rather read:
1 - Well-written, to-the-point threads
2 - Articles, essays, or op-eds
(If you respond to the poll, please also retweet it)
I find myself opening a lot of articles/essays and never finding the time to read all of them. A lot of the time, they're paywalled one way or another. Meanwhile the thread version of the same article would be to the point, highlights the important bits, and... is free.
Also, threads offer additional advantages:
- The like/retweet counter gives me an idea which points of the thread are more provocative/important
- Quote-retweets take me to interesting side-discussions, conversations, critiques, and takes
All on the same platform.
I have to say this is an advantage as a writer too (not just as a reader). Writing a thread has a lower editing bar, and because it's an inherently informal medium, it encourages new ideas, creative takes, questions, etc. You can't do an AMA op-ed.
Just to be clear - I also do read articles, essays, and books. And I listen to podcasts and watch videos daily. But I find myself reading a lot more threads than any of the above. And when I write, I often write the "thread version" first.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Arab world doesn't have a "critical thinking" problem, it has a free speech problem. This idea that some groups of human beings somehow can't think and need to be "taught" is bullcrap. When they don't think it's not because they can't, it's because they're afraid to.
I was exactly the person I was in 2011 that I was in 2010 and so were my comrades across the Arab world. When our public spheres exploded with ideas and questions and debates in 2011, it wasn't because we all took a course. It was because we dared to speak freely.
Also, I absolutely hate it when people speak to me (or about me) as if I'm some sort of aberration. I am not a spectacular person and or an exception. I'm just another Arab person who grew up in the Arab world. I'm just lucky enough that I'm in exile and not in prison (or dead).
Abdulhadi Al Khawaja is Bahrain's most prominent human rights defender. This is a man who has dedicated his life to bringing freedom, human rights, and democracy in his country. He's serving his 10th year in prison. He went on a hunger strike last month.
The BICI report mentioned in the thread was an report that Bahrain's regime commissioned in 2011 to look into allegations of abuse. It ended up documenting horrific and systemic abuse. More about the report in this poignant thread:
How do we even define the word "Islamist" any more? The overuse of the word is quickly rendering it meaningless
To me, Islamism is a form of religious nationalism. Islamists are only Islamists if they believe in establishing a state in which Muslims have supremacy over non-Muslims; a state in which non-Muslims have curtailed rights by virtue of their identity
In this, I see Islamism as not very different from other forms of religious nationalism, including among Christians ("this is a White Christian Nation"); Jews (e.g. Bennett "I am proud of religious Zionism"); Hindutva, etc.
Somehow our colonizers who have ethnically cleansed us, stole our land & homes, and continue to stand on our necks... are the victims, and we're the bad guys
The nuclear-armed state with 70 years of unqualified support from every major Western power and most world powers... are the victims, and we're the ones who have to be considerate towards their tanks and walls and sniper rifles
Which is just confirming the point of the thread he's replying to. They will *never* see us a human beings. The existence of the settler-colonial regime is more valuable to them than every single Palestinian life combined.
Whenever they speak of humanist ideals, human rights, enlightenment values, democracy, or any other of their lies, just show them the finger, honestly. It's not even worth the conversation. It's really on us if we ever believe them.
This is the same piece of shit who was wondering what the "crisis of Islam" is. Our crisis is the dictators who you support, sell weapons to and shake hands with. I bet after he leaves politics he'll be making millions consulting for them too.
Notes to the seeker. Most of the time when we love, we aren't in love with the thing itself - or the person themselves - but with a story we spun around them. In other words, we fell in love with an egotistical reflection of ourselves.
It is important to let go of the story in order to truly see the thing itself, or the person themselves. You may resist this, but it is important to get disillusioned of the story. It is only then that we find out what - or who - we were in love with.
If it is ego, then you should let it go. But if it is indeed true love, then submit to it regardless the cost. If it beckons, follow it regardless the path. If it speaks, believe it regardless the hurt. For it is both your trial and your salvation.